Literature DB >> 16154839

Identification of novel cytogenetic markers with prognostic significance in a series of 968 patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes.

Francesc Solé1, Elisa Luño, Carmen Sanzo, Blanca Espinet, Guillermo F Sanz, José Cervera, María José Calasanz, Juan Cruz Cigudosa, Fuensanta Millà, Josep Maria Ribera, Encarna Bureo, Maria Luisa Marquez, Eva Arranz, Lourdes Florensa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The main prognostic factors in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are chromosomal abnormalities, the proportion of blasts in bone marrow and number and degree of cytopenias. A consensus-defined International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for predicting outcome and planning therapy in MDS has been developed, but its prognostic value in a large and independent series remains unproven. Furthermore, the intermediate-risk cytogenetic subgroup defined by the IPSS includes a miscellaneous number of different single abnormalities of uncertain prognostic significance at present. The main aim of the present study was to identify chromosomal abnormalities with a previously unrecognized good or poor prognosis in order to find new cytogenetic markers with predictive value. DESIGN AND METHODS: We report the cytogenetic findings in a series of 968 patients with primary MDS from the Spanish Cytogenetics Working Group, Grupo Cooperativo Español de Citogenética Hematológica (GCECGH).
RESULTS: In this series of 968 MDS patients, we found various cytogenetic aberrations with a new prognostic impact. Complex karyotype, -7/7q- and i(17q) had a poor prognosis; normal karyotype, loss of Y chromosome, deletion 11q, deletion 12p and deletion 20q as single alterations had a good prognosis. Intermediate prognosis aberrations were rearrangements of 3q21q26, trisomy 8, trisomy 9, translocations of 11q and del(17p). Finally, a new group of single or double cytogenetic abnormalities, most of which are considered rare cytogenetic events and are usually included in the intermediate category of the IPSS, showed a trend to poor prognosis. INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that some specific chromosomal abnormalities could be segregated from the IPSS intermediate-risk cytogenetic prognostic subgroup and included in the low risk or in the poor risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16154839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  42 in total

1.  Coalesced multicentric analysis of 2,351 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes indicates an underestimation of poor-risk cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes in the international prognostic scoring system.

Authors:  Julie Schanz; Christian Steidl; Christa Fonatsch; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Thomas Nösslinger; Heinz Tuechler; Peter Valent; Barbara Hildebrandt; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Carlo Aul; Michael Lübbert; Reinhard Stauder; Otto Krieger; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase; Elihu Estey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes: are the new classifications useful?

Authors:  Naomi Galili; Azra Raza
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Prognostic impact of SNP array karyotyping in myelodysplastic syndromes and related myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Ramon V Tiu; Lukasz P Gondek; Christine L O'Keefe; Paul Elson; Jungwon Huh; Azim Mohamedali; Austin Kulasekararaj; Anjali S Advani; Ronald Paquette; Alan F List; Mikkael A Sekeres; Michael A McDevitt; Ghulam J Mufti; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  High-resolution genomic arrays facilitate detection of novel cryptic chromosomal lesions in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Christine L O'Keefe; Ramon Tiu; Lukasz P Gondek; Jennifer Powers; Karl S Theil; Matt Kalaycio; Alan Lichtin; Mikkael A Sekeres; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  What lies beyond del(5q) in myelodysplastic syndrome?

Authors:  Vera Adema; Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Whole genome scanning as a cytogenetic tool in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Ghulam J Mufti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Trisomy 9 in a Patient with Acute Myelogenous Leukaemia FAB Type M2: A Rare Occurrence.

Authors:  R Chaubey; S Sazawal; R Dada; P Sharma; D Pathak; R Saxena
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 8.  Last marrow standing: bone marrow transplantation for acquired bone marrow failure conditions.

Authors:  Aaron T Gerds; Bart L Scott
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Chromosomal lesions and uniparental disomy detected by SNP arrays in MDS, MDS/MPD, and MDS-derived AML.

Authors:  Lukasz P Gondek; Ramon Tiu; Christine L O'Keefe; Mikkael A Sekeres; Karl S Theil; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Pattern-selection based power analysis and discrimination of low- and high-grade myelodysplastic syndromes study using SNP arrays.

Authors:  Xiaorong Yang; Xiaobo Zhou; Wan-Ting Huang; Lingyun Wu; Federico A Monzon; Chung-Che Chang; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.