Literature DB >> 22331553

Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants.

Woo-Taek Lee1, Jai-Young Koak, Young-Jun Lim, Seong-Kyun Kim, Ho-Beom Kwon, Myung-Joo Kim.   

Abstract

The poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) polymer is of great interest as an alternative to titanium in orthopedics because of its biocompatibility and low elastic modulus. This study evaluated the fatigue limits of PEEK and the effects of the low elastic modulus PEEK in relation to existing dental implants. Compressive loading tests were performed with glass fiber-reinforced PEEK (GFR-PEEK), carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK (CFR-PEEK), and titanium rods. Among these tests, GFR-PEEK fatigue tests were performed according to ISO 14801. For the finite element analysis, three-dimensional models of dental implants and bone were constructed. The implants in the test groups were coated with a 0.5-mm thick and 5-mm long PEEK layer on the upper intrabony area. The strain energy densities (SED) were calculated, and the bone resorption was predicted. The fatigue limits of GFR-PEEK were 310 N and were higher than the static compressive strength of GFR-PEEK. The bone around PEEK-coated implants showed higher levels of SED than the bone in direct contact with the implants, and the wider diameter and stiffer implants showed lower levels of SED. The compressive strength of the GFR-PEEK and CFR-PEEK implants ranged within the bite force of the anterior and posterior dentitions, respectively, and the PEEK implants showed adequate fatigue limits for replacing the anterior teeth. Dental implants with PEEK coatings and PEEK implants may reduce stress shielding effects. Dental implant application of PEEK polymer-fatigue limit and stress shielding.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22331553     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  31 in total

1.  Polymer coatings based on sulfonated-poly-ether-ether-ketone films for implant dentistry applications.

Authors:  R S Brum; P R Monich; M C Fredel; G Contri; S D A S Ramoa; R S Magini; C A M Benfatti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Evaluation of stress distribution in an endodontically treated tooth restored with four different post systems and two different crowns- A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Rajvi Nahar; Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-10-09

Review 3.  Modification of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) physical features to improve osteointegration.

Authors:  Dan Yu; Xiaoyue Lei; Huiyong Zhu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.066

4.  Design considerations for piezoelectrically powered electrical stimulation: The balance between power generation and fatigue resistance.

Authors:  Ember D Krech; Leighton J LaPierre; Safakcan Tuncdemir; A Erkan Gurdal; Evan G Haas; Paul M Arnold; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 5.  Properties of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments: A systematic review.

Authors:  Romaisa Ghazal-Maghras; Jaime Vilaplana-Vivo; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; Yolanda Martínez-Beneyto
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Biomechanical evaluations of the long-term stability of dental implant using finite element modeling method: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seyed Aref Hosseini-Faradonbeh; Hamid Reza Katoozian
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.989

7.  Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications.

Authors:  Martin Rosentritt; Verena Preis; Michael Behr; Nuno Sereno; Carola Kolbeck
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system.

Authors:  Kasturi Chandrashekhar Kelkar; Vinaya Bhat; Chethan Hegde
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-02-23

10.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66/glass fibre (n-HA/PA66/GF) as a novel bioactive bone screw.

Authors:  Bao Su; Xiaohua Peng; Dianming Jiang; Jun Wu; Bo Qiao; Weichao Li; Xiaotong Qi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.