Literature DB >> 22331479

Social networks, social support and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis.

Candyce H Kroenke1, Yvonne Michael, Hilary Tindle, Elizabeth Gage, Rowan Chlebowski, Lorena Garcia, Catherine Messina, Joann E Manson, Bette J Caan.   

Abstract

Though larger social networks are associated with reduced breast cancer mortality, there is a need to clarify how both social support and social burden influence this association. We included 4,530 women from the Women's Health Initiative who were diagnosed with breast cancer between 1993 and 2009, and provided data on social networks (spouse or intimate partner, religious ties, club ties, and number of first-degree relatives) before diagnosis. Of those, 354 died during follow-up, with 190 from breast cancer. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate associations of social network members with risk of post-diagnosis mortality, further evaluating associations by social support and social burden (caregiving, social strain). In multivariate-adjusted analyses, among women with high but not low social support, being married was related to lower all-cause mortality. By contrast, among women with high but not low social burden, those with a higher number of first-degree relatives, including siblings, parents, and children, had higher all-cause and breast cancer mortality (among caregivers: 0-3 relatives (ref), 4-5 relatives, HR = 1.47 (95% CI: 0.62-3.52), 6-9 relatives, HR = 2.08 (95% CI: 0.89-4.86), 10+ relatives, HR = 3.55 (95% CI: 1.35-9.33), P-continuous = 0.02, P-interaction = 0.008). The association by social strain was similar though it was not modified by level of social support. Other social network members were unrelated to mortality. Social relationships may have both adverse and beneficial influences on breast cancer survival. Clarifying these depends on understanding the context of women's relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22331479      PMCID: PMC4856003          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1962-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  32 in total

1.  Outcomes ascertainment and adjudication methods in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Comparison of baseline and repeated measure covariate techniques in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  L A Cupples; R B D'Agostino; K Anderson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-02

4.  Social support and survival in young women with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ann F Chou; Susan L Stewart; Robert C Wild; Joan R Bloom
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study.

Authors:  R Schulz; S R Beach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  Effects of social relationships on survival for women with breast cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  N Waxler-Morrison; T G Hislop; B Mears; L Kan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Chronic stress and immunity in family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease victims.

Authors:  J K Kiecolt-Glaser; R Glaser; E C Shuttleworth; C S Dyer; P Ogrocki; C E Speicher
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  The relationship between social ties and survival among black and white breast cancer patients. National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group.

Authors:  P Reynolds; P T Boyd; R S Blacklow; J S Jackson; R S Greenberg; D F Austin; V W Chen; B K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1994 Apr-May       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Relationship of social support and social burden to repeated breast cancer screening in the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Catherine R Messina; Dorothy S Lane; Karen Glanz; Delia Smith West; Vicky Taylor; William Frishman; Lynda Powell
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  25 in total

1.  Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Marilyn L Kwan; Alfred I Neugut; Isaac J Ergas; Jaime D Wright; Bette J Caan; Dawn Hershman; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Rural-Urban Residence and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Molly E Roseland; Michele L Cote; Amy Lehman; Eric A Whitsel; Faheemah N Mustafaa; Jason Booza; Michael S Simon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) study.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Charles Quesenberry; Marilyn L Kwan; Carol Sweeney; Adrienne Castillo; Bette J Caan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Social Relationships and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Michael Hendryx; Wanda Nicholson; JoAnn E Manson; Candyce H Kroenke; Jennifer Lee; Julie C Weitlauf; Lorena Garcia; Junmei M Jonasson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Juhua Luo
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Cancer-Related Debt and Mental-Health-Related Quality of Life among Rural Cancer Survivors: Do Family/Friend Informal Caregiver Networks Moderate the Relationship?

Authors:  Emily Hallgren; Theresa A Hastert; Leslie R Carnahan; Jan M Eberth; Scherezade K Mama; Karriem S Watson; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2020-02-01

6.  A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Telomere Length and Sleep in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Laurie Grieshober; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rachael Hageman Blair; Lina Mu; Jingmin Liu; Jing Nie; Cara L Carty; Lauren Hale; Candyce H Kroenke; Andrea Z LaCroix; Alex P Reiner; Heather M Ochs-Balcom
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Depression and family interaction among low-income, predominantly hispanic cancer patients: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Hyunsung Oh; Kathleen Ell; Andrew Subica
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Postdiagnosis social networks and breast cancer mortality in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Yvonne L Michael; Elizabeth M Poole; Marilyn L Kwan; Sarah Nechuta; Eric Leas; Bette J Caan; John Pierce; Xiao-Ou Shu; Ying Zheng; Wendy Y Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Close social ties and health in later life: Strengths and vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Karen S Rook; Susan T Charles
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2017-09

10.  Measuring social support in patients with advanced medical illnesses: An analysis of the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire.

Authors:  Rebecca Saracino; Elissa Kolva; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.