Ann F Chou1, Susan L Stewart, Robert C Wild, Joan R Bloom. 1. Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. ann-chou@ouhsc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although previous evidence has shown increased likelihood for survival in cancer patients who have social support, little is known about changes in social support during illness and their impact on survival. This study examines the relationship between social support and survival among women diagnosed with breast carcinoma, specifically assessing the effect of network size and changes in social contact post-diagnosis. METHODS: A population-based sample of 584 women was followed for up to 12.5 years (median follow-up = 10.3 years). The mean age at diagnosis was 44 years, 81% were married, and 29% were racial/ethnic minorities. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate survival as a function of social support (changes in social contact and the size of social support), disease severity, treatment, health status, and socio-demographic factors. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the women had local and 44% had regional stage disease. About 53% underwent mastectomy, 68% received chemotherapy, and 55% had radiation. Regression results showed that disease stage, estrogen receptor status, and mastectomy were associated with greater risk of dying. Although network size was not related to survival, increased contact with friends/family post-diagnosis was associated with lower risk of death, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17-0.57). CONCLUSION: Findings from this study have identified an important aspect of a woman's social network that impacts survival. An increase in the amount of social contact, representing greater social support, may increase the likelihood of the women's survival by enhancing their coping skills, providing emotional support, and expanding opportunities for information-sharing.
PURPOSE: Although previous evidence has shown increased likelihood for survival in cancerpatients who have social support, little is known about changes in social support during illness and their impact on survival. This study examines the relationship between social support and survival among women diagnosed with breast carcinoma, specifically assessing the effect of network size and changes in social contact post-diagnosis. METHODS: A population-based sample of 584 women was followed for up to 12.5 years (median follow-up = 10.3 years). The mean age at diagnosis was 44 years, 81% were married, and 29% were racial/ethnic minorities. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate survival as a function of social support (changes in social contact and the size of social support), disease severity, treatment, health status, and socio-demographic factors. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of the women had local and 44% had regional stage disease. About 53% underwent mastectomy, 68% received chemotherapy, and 55% had radiation. Regression results showed that disease stage, estrogen receptor status, and mastectomy were associated with greater risk of dying. Although network size was not related to survival, increased contact with friends/family post-diagnosis was associated with lower risk of death, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17-0.57). CONCLUSION: Findings from this study have identified an important aspect of a woman's social network that impacts survival. An increase in the amount of social contact, representing greater social support, may increase the likelihood of the women's survival by enhancing their coping skills, providing emotional support, and expanding opportunities for information-sharing.
Authors: Chiara Nosarti; Jonathan V Roberts; Timothy Crayford; Kwame McKenzie; Anthony S David Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Susan M Allen; Ann C Shah; Arthur M Nezu; Christine Maguth Nezu; Desirée Ciambrone; Joseph Hogan; Vincent Mor Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Candyce H Kroenke; Marilyn L Kwan; Alfred I Neugut; Isaac J Ergas; Jaime D Wright; Bette J Caan; Dawn Hershman; Lawrence H Kushi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Candyce H Kroenke; Charles Quesenberry; Marilyn L Kwan; Carol Sweeney; Adrienne Castillo; Bette J Caan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Carolyn Y Fang; Brian L Egleston; John A Ridge; Miriam N Lango; Dana H Bovbjerg; Jamie L Studts; Barbara A Burtness; Margret B Einarson; Andres J P Klein-Szanto Journal: Head Neck Date: 2013-10-26 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Emily Hallgren; Theresa A Hastert; Leslie R Carnahan; Jan M Eberth; Scherezade K Mama; Karriem S Watson; Yamilé Molina Journal: J Health Soc Behav Date: 2020-02-01
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Erin E Kent; Kathryn E Weaver; Natasha Buchanan; Nikki A Hawkins; Juan L Rodriguez; A Blythe Ryerson; Julia H Rowland Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Candyce H Kroenke; Yvonne L Michael; Xiao-Ou Shu; Elizabeth M Poole; Marilyn L Kwan; Sarah Nechuta; Bette J Caan; John P Pierce; Wendy Y Chen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.894