Literature DB >> 23143212

Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) study.

Candyce H Kroenke1, Charles Quesenberry, Marilyn L Kwan, Carol Sweeney, Adrienne Castillo, Bette J Caan.   

Abstract

Larger social networks have been associated with lower breast cancer mortality. The authors evaluated how levels of social support and burden influenced this association. We included 2,264 women from the Life After Cancer Epidemiology study who were diagnosed with early-stage, invasive breast cancer between 1997 and 2000, and provided data on social networks (spouse or intimate partner, religious/social ties, volunteering, time socializing with friends, and number of first-degree female relatives), social support, and caregiving. 401 died during a median follow-up of 10.8 years follow-up with 215 from breast cancer. We used delayed entry Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate associations. In multivariate-adjusted analyses, social isolation was unrelated to recurrence or breast cancer-specific mortality. However, socially isolated women had higher all-cause mortality (HR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.73) and mortality from other causes (HR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.19-2.68). Levels of social support and burden modified associations. Among those with low, but not high, levels of social support from friends and family, lack of religious/social participation (HR = 1.58, 95 % CI: 1.07-2.36, p = 0.02, p interaction = 0.01) and lack of volunteering (HR = 1.78, 95 % CI: 1.15-2.77, p = 0.01, p interaction = 0.01) predicted higher all-cause mortality. In cross-classification analyses, only women with both small networks and low levels of support (HR = 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.10-2.38) had a significantly higher risk of mortality than women with large networks and high levels of support; women with small networks and high levels of support had no higher risk of mortality (HR = 1.13, 95 % CI: 0.74-1.72). Social networks were also more important for caregivers versus noncaregivers. Larger social networks predicted better prognosis after breast cancer, but associations depended on the quality and burden of family relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143212      PMCID: PMC4019377          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2253-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  48 in total

1.  Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold.

Authors:  S Cohen; W J Doyle; D P Skoner; B S Rabin; J M Gwaltney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Wendy Birmingham; Brandon Q Jones
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-03-18

3.  Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years.

Authors:  W J Strawbridge; R D Cohen; S J Shema; G A Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The impact of marital status and quality on family functioning in maternal chronic illness.

Authors:  B C Yates; L S Bensley; B Lalonde; F M Lewis; N F Woods
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

5.  Support systems and stress reduction among workers caring for dependent parents.

Authors:  V M Lechner
Journal:  Soc Work       Date:  1993-07

6.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument.

Authors:  M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Social networks and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jeannette M Beasley; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Rachel M Ceballos; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Kathleen M Egan; Michelle D Holmes
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Effects of social integration on health: A prospective study of community engagement among African American women.

Authors:  Kate E Fothergill; Margaret E Ensminger; Judy Robertson; Kerry M Green; Roland J Thorpe; Hee-Soon Juon
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Social relations in older adults: Secular trends and longitudinal changes over a 16-year follow-up.

Authors:  Tiina-Mari Lyyra; Anna-Liisa Lyyra; Kirsi Lumme-Sandt; Pirjo Tiikkainen; Riitta-Liisa Heikkinen
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  The relationship between social ties and survival among black and white breast cancer patients. National Cancer Institute Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group.

Authors:  P Reynolds; P T Boyd; R S Blacklow; J S Jackson; R S Greenberg; D F Austin; V W Chen; B K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1994 Apr-May       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  51 in total

1.  Benefits of marriage on relative and conditional relative cancer survival differ between males and females in the USA.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill; Erin Johnson
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Chemotherapy completion in elderly women with ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer - An NRG oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Vivian E von Gruenigen; Helen Q Huang; Jan H Beumer; Heather A Lankes; William Tew; Thomas Herzog; Arti Hurria; Robert S Mannel; Tina Rizack; Lisa M Landrum; Peter G Rose; Ritu Salani; William H Bradley; Thomas J Rutherford; Robert V Higgins; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Gini Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Marilyn L Kwan; Alfred I Neugut; Isaac J Ergas; Jaime D Wright; Bette J Caan; Dawn Hershman; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A conceptual model of social networks and mechanisms of cancer mortality, and potential strategies to improve survival: an invited commentary.

Authors:  Yamilé Molina
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Social Support, Social Network Size, Social Strain, Stressful Life Events, and Coronary Heart Disease in Women With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study Based on the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Junmei Miao Jonasson; Michael Hendryx; Aladdin H Shadyab; Erika Kelley; Karen C Johnson; Candyce H Kroenke; Lorena Garcia; Sofia Lawesson; Ailiana Santosa; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Xiaochen Lin; Crystal W Cene; Simin Liu; Carolina Valdiviezo; Juhua Luo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Social Relationships and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Among Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Michael Hendryx; Wanda Nicholson; JoAnn E Manson; Candyce H Kroenke; Jennifer Lee; Julie C Weitlauf; Lorena Garcia; Junmei M Jonasson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Juhua Luo
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  Social Ambivalence and Disease (SAD): A Theoretical Model Aimed at Understanding the Health Implications of Ambivalent Relationships.

Authors:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad; Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18

8.  Social well-being is associated with less pro-inflammatory and pro-metastatic leukocyte gene expression in women after surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Devika R Jutagir; Bonnie B Blomberg; Charles S Carver; Suzanne C Lechner; Kiara R Timpano; Laura C Bouchard; Lisa M Gudenkauf; Jamie M Jacobs; Alain Diaz; Susan K Lutgendorf; Steve W Cole; Aaron S Heller; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Effect of Cultural, Folk, and Religious Beliefs and Practices on Delays in Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer in African American Women.

Authors:  Patricia G Moorman; Nadine J Barrett; Frances Wang; J Anthony Alberg; Elisa V Bandera; J B Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa Bondy; Michele L Cote; Ellen Funkhouser; Linda E Kelemen; Lauren C Peres; Edwards S Peters; A G Schwartz; Paul D Terry; Sydnee Crankshaw; Sarah E Abbott; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Postdiagnosis social networks and breast cancer mortality in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Yvonne L Michael; Elizabeth M Poole; Marilyn L Kwan; Sarah Nechuta; Eric Leas; Bette J Caan; John Pierce; Xiao-Ou Shu; Ying Zheng; Wendy Y Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.