Literature DB >> 22330606

Defining face perception areas in the human brain: a large-scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis.

Bruno Rossion1, Bernard Hanseeuw, Laurence Dricot.   

Abstract

A number of human brain areas showing a larger response to faces than to objects from different categories, or to scrambled faces, have been identified in neuroimaging studies. Depending on the statistical criteria used, the set of areas can be overextended or minimized, both at the local (size of areas) and global (number of areas) levels. Here we analyzed a whole-brain factorial functional localizer obtained in a large sample of right-handed participants (40). Faces (F), objects (O; cars) and their phase-scrambled counterparts (SF, SO) were presented in a block design during a one-back task that was well matched for difficulty across conditions. A conjunction contrast at the group level {(F-SF) and (F-O)} identified six clusters: in the pulvinar, inferior occipital gyrus (so-called OFA), middle fusiform gyrus (so-called FFA), posterior superior temporal sulcus, amygdala, and anterior infero-temporal cortex, which were all strongly right lateralized. While the FFA showed the largest difference between faces and cars, it also showed the least face-selective response, responding more to cars than scrambled cars. Moreover, the FFA's larger response to scrambled faces than scrambled cars suggests that its face-sensitivity is partly due to low-level visual cues. In contrast, the pattern of activation in the OFA points to a higher degree of face-selectivity. A BOLD latency mapping analysis suggests that face-sensitivity emerges first in the right FFA, as compared to all other areas. Individual brain analyses support these observations, but also highlight the large amount of interindividual variability in terms of number, height, extent and localization of the areas responding preferentially to faces in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex. This observation emphasizes the need to rely on different statistical thresholds across the whole brain and across individuals to define these areas, but also raises some concerns regarding any objective labeling of these areas to make them correspond across individual brains. This large-scale analysis helps understanding the set of face-sensitive areas in the human brain, and encourages in-depth single participant analyses in which the whole set of areas is considered in each individual brain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22330606     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  66 in total

1.  Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition.

Authors:  Meike Ramon; Luca Vizioli; Joan Liu-Shuang; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  FFA and OFA Encode Distinct Types of Face Identity Information.

Authors:  Maria Tsantani; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Katherine Storrs; Adrian Lloyd Williams; Carolyn McGettigan; Lúcia Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Word inversion sensitivity as a marker of visual word form area lateralization: An application of a novel multivariate measure of laterality.

Authors:  Brandon J Carlos; Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Corrine Durisko; Julie A Fiez; Marc N Coutanche
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A face-selective ventral occipito-temporal map of the human brain with intracerebral potentials.

Authors:  Jacques Jonas; Corentin Jacques; Joan Liu-Shuang; Hélène Brissart; Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Louis Maillard; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Holistic versus feature-based binding in the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Rebecca N van den Honert; Gregory McCarthy; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Dedifferentiated face processing in older adults is linked to lower resting state metabolic activity in fusiform face area.

Authors:  Leslie Zebrowitz; Noreen Ward; Jasmine Boshyan; Angela Gutchess; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Probabilistic atlases for face and biological motion perception: an analysis of their reliability and overlap.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The effect of face inversion for neurons inside and outside fMRI-defined face-selective cortical regions.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Goedele Van Belle; Wim Vanduffel; Bruno Rossion; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Beyond the FFA: The role of the ventral anterior temporal lobes in face processing.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Functional and structural aging of the speech sensorimotor neural system: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Anthony S Dick; Steven L Small
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.