Literature DB >> 22329683

Optimal foraging in semantic memory.

Thomas T Hills1, Michael N Jones, Peter M Todd.   

Abstract

Do humans search in memory using dynamic local-to-global search strategies similar to those that animals use to forage between patches in space? If so, do their dynamic memory search policies correspond to optimal foraging strategies seen for spatial foraging? Results from a number of fields suggest these possibilities, including the shared structure of the search problems-searching in patchy environments-and recent evidence supporting a domain-general cognitive search process. To investigate these questions directly, we asked participants to recover from memory as many animal names as they could in 3 min. Memory search was modeled over a representation of the semantic search space generated from the BEAGLE memory model of Jones and Mewhort (2007), via a search process similar to models of associative memory search (e.g., Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1981). We found evidence for local structure (i.e., patches) in memory search and patch depletion preceding dynamic local-to-global transitions between patches. Dynamic models also significantly outperformed nondynamic models. The timing of dynamic local-to-global transitions was consistent with optimal search policies in space, specifically the marginal value theorem (Charnov, 1976), and participants who were more consistent with this policy recalled more items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22329683     DOI: 10.1037/a0027373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  67 in total

1.  Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging.

Authors:  Janelle Szary; Rick Dale; Christopher T Kello; Theo Rhodes
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  A Large-Scale Semantic Analysis of Verbal Fluency Across the Aging Spectrum: Data From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Authors:  Vanessa Taler; Brendan T Johns; Michael N Jones
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Rats value time differently on equivalent foraging and delay-discounting tasks.

Authors:  Evan C Carter; A David Redish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-30

4.  Dynamic memory searches: Selective output interference for the memory of facts.

Authors:  William R Aue; Amy H Criss; Melissa A Prince
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Estimating semantic networks of groups and individuals from fluency data.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla; Joseph L Austerweil
Journal:  Comput Brain Behav       Date:  2018-06-06

6.  Modeling Semantic Fluency Data as Search on a Semantic Network.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla; Joseph L Austerweil
Journal:  Cogsci       Date:  2017-07

Review 7.  Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Pete C Trimmer; Daniel T Blumstein; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.

Authors:  Sara M Constantino; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 9.  Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills; Peter M Todd; David Lazer; A David Redish; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Mechanisms of age-related decline in memory search across the adult life span.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills; Rui Mata; Andreas Wilke; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2013-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.