Literature DB >> 25911444

Dynamic memory searches: Selective output interference for the memory of facts.

William R Aue1,2, Amy H Criss3, Melissa A Prince4.   

Abstract

The benefits of testing on later memory performance are well documented; however, the manner in which testing harms memory performance is less well understood. This research is concerned with the finding that accuracy decreases over the course of testing, a phenomena termed "output interference" (OI). OI has primarily been investigated with episodic memory, but there is limited research investigating OI in measures of semantic memory (i.e., knowledge). In the current study, participants were twice tested for their knowledge of factual questions; they received corrective feedback during the first test. No OI was observed during the first test, when participants presumably searched semantic memory to answer the general-knowledge questions. During the second test, OI was observed. Conditional analyses of Test 2 performance revealed that OI was largely isolated to questions answered incorrectly during Test 1. These were questions for which participants needed to rely on recent experience (i.e., the feedback in episodic memory) to respond correctly. One possible explanation is that episodic memory is more susceptible to the sort of interference generated during testing (e.g., gradual changes in context, encoding/updating of items) relative to semantic memory. Alternative explanations are considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interference; Knowledge; Recognition; Testing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25911444     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0840-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

Review 1.  A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.

Authors:  L J Schooler; R M Shiffrin; J G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

3.  Inhibiting effects of recall.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-03

4.  Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: a tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Tom Lodewyckx; Himanshu Kuriyal; Raoul Grasman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Sources of interference in recognition testing.

Authors:  Jeffrey Annis; Kenneth J Malmberg; Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  An examination of trace storage in free recall.

Authors:  N J Slamecka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-04

9.  Inhibition from semantically related primes: evidence of a category-specific inhibition.

Authors:  T A Blaxton; J H Neely
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-09

10.  Overcoming the negative consequences of interference from recognition memory testing.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Amy H Criss; Tarun H Gangwani; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanisms of output interference in cued recall.

Authors:  Jack H Wilson; David Kellen; Amy H Criss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.