Literature DB >> 31179436

Estimating semantic networks of groups and individuals from fluency data.

Jeffrey C Zemla1, Joseph L Austerweil1.   

Abstract

One popular and classic theory of how the mind encodes knowledge is an associative semantic network, where concepts and associations between concepts correspond to nodes and edges, respectively. A major issue in semantic network research is that there is no consensus among researchers as to the best method for estimating the network of an individual or group. We propose a novel method (U-INVITE) for estimating semantic networks from semantic fluency data (listing items from a category) based on a censored random walk model of memory retrieval. We compare this method to several other methods in the literature for estimating networks from semantic fluency data. In simulations, we find that U-INVITE can recover semantic networks with low error rates given only a moderate amount of data. U-INVITE is the only known method derived from a psychologically plausible process model of memory retrieval and one of two known methods that we found to be consistent estimators of this process: if semantic memory retrieval is consistent with this process, the procedure will eventually estimate the true network (given enough data). We conduct the first exploration of different methods for estimating psychologically-valid semantic networks by comparing people's similarity judgments of edges estimated by each network estimation method. To encourage best practices, we discuss the merits of each network estimation technique, provide a flow chart that assists with choosing an appropriate method, and supply code for others to employ these techniques on their own data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; fluency; knowledge representation; methodology; semantic networks

Year:  2018        PMID: 31179436      PMCID: PMC6555428          DOI: 10.1007/s42113-018-0003-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Brain Behav        ISSN: 2522-0861


  39 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference.

Authors:  J B Tenenbaum; T L Griffiths
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Cathy L McEvoy; Thomas A Schreiber
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

4.  Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.

Authors:  Michael N Jones; Douglas J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Topics in semantic representation.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Mark Steyvers; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Dimensions of similarity.

Authors:  F ATTNEAVE
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-10

8.  Word associations: network and semantic properties.

Authors:  Simon De Deyne; Gert Storms
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-02

9.  Both processing speed and semantic memory organization predict verbal fluency in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sophia Vinogradov; Jennifer Kirkland; John H Poole; Michael Drexler; Beth A Ober; Gregory K Shenaut
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Small-world brain networks.

Authors:  Danielle Smith Bassett; Ed Bullmore
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.519

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of modern network science to the cognitive sciences: revisiting research spirals of representation and process.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Cynthia S Q Siew
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Investigating the network structure of domain-specific knowledge using the semantic fluency task.

Authors:  Cynthia S Q Siew; Anutra Guru
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Evidence against a relation between bilingualism and creativity.

Authors:  Kendra V Lange; Elise W M Hopman; Jeffrey C Zemla; Joseph L Austerweil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Analyzing Knowledge Retrieval Impairments Associated with Alzheimer's Disease Using Network Analyses.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla; Joseph L Austerweil
Journal:  Complexity       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  SNAFU: The Semantic Network and Fluency Utility.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla; Kesong Cao; Kimberly D Mueller; Joseph L Austerweil
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-08

Review 6.  Knowledge Representations Derived From Semantic Fluency Data.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Zemla
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-11

7.  If you don't let it in, you don't have to get it out: Thought preemption as a method to control unwanted thoughts.

Authors:  Isaac Fradkin; Eran Eldar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.779

8.  Highly scalable maximum likelihood and conjugate Bayesian inference for ERGMs on graph sets with equivalent vertices.

Authors:  Fan Yin; Carter T Butts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 9.  Using Network Science to Understand the Aging Lexicon: Linking Individuals' Experience, Semantic Networks, and Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Dirk U Wulff; Simon De Deyne; Samuel Aeschbach; Rui Mata
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-01-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.