Literature DB >> 2232943

The diet and cancer hypothesis: current trends.

R Saracci1.   

Abstract

The current decade has witnessed an increasing interest in the diet-cancer issue as a central one for public health. Notwithstanding a substantial amount of epidemiological investigations, firm evidence of carcinogenicity exists only for alcoholic beverages with respect to cancers at several sites, and for aflatoxin with respect to liver cancer; also, the relation is established between diet related excess of energy intake, as translated into obesity, and cancer of endometrium and gallbladder. For a number of other dietary factors the evidence for a causal or protective role still remains at a presumptive level (e.g. intake of fresh vegetables and fruits with respect to cancers at several sites), or is still frankly open to debate (e.g. fat with respect to breast and colon cancer). Methodological inadequacies in past studies have been identified and clearer results should derive in the coming decade from epidemiological investigations substantially improved in methodology, particularly from the long-term prospective studies as now planned by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Fortunately for cancer prevention, such dietary advice as can be derived from the highly incomplete and unsatisfactory knowledge on the role of dietary factors on cancer, turns out to be in broad agreement with the advice aimed at preventing other major diseases such as ischaemic heart disease and hypertension. This allows the issuing of a set of simple but important 'prudent diet' recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2232943     DOI: 10.1007/bf02988537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother        ISSN: 0736-0118


  6 in total

1.  Nutrition in relation to cancer.

Authors:  A TANNENBAUM; H SILVERSTONE
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1953       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 2.  Dietary and nutritional influences on cancer: a review of epidemiologic and experimental data.

Authors:  A E Rogers; M P Longnecker
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.662

3.  Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC Monographs volumes 1 to 42.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum Suppl       Date:  1987

4.  Weight, diet, and the risk of symptomatic gallstones in middle-aged women.

Authors:  K M Maclure; K C Hayes; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; F E Speizer; W C Willett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today.

Authors:  R Doll; R Peto
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Variations in mortality by weight among 750,000 men and women.

Authors:  E A Lew; L Garfinkel
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979
  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Energy balance and cancers.

Authors:  M Gerber; D Corpet
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.497

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.