Literature DB >> 22327240

Efficacy of new playback functions at reducing small-bowel wireless capsule endoscopy reading times.

Venkataraman Subramanian1, Jayan Mannath, Emmanouil Telakis, Krish Ragunath, Christopher J Hawkey.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Interpretation of video capsule data is time-consuming. Olympus capsule endoscopy (CE) software systems are equipped with auto-speed-adjusted and express-selected playback modes and overview function in an effort to reduce reading times. The clinical efficacy of these new playback features is unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and reading times of these new playback features.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving two experienced CE readers who analysed the CE procedures using either overview with express-selected or overview with auto-speed-adjusted modes. All CE videos were read blinded using Olympus Endocapsule software at 15 frames per second. The findings were then compared with those obtained when the CE procedures were read with conventional methods.
RESULTS: Seventy patients (36 male, 34 female) with a mean age of 51 ± 22 years were included in the study. Clinically significant findings were found for 40/70 (57%) patients. Use of overview function alone resulted in recognition of 32/40 (80%) clinically significant findings; when overview function was combined with express-selected or auto-speed-adjusted methods 39/40 (97.5%) clinically significant findings were recognised. The average reading time for overview with auto-speed-adjusted mode (34 ± 10 min) was significantly (p = 0.001) more than for overview with express-selected mode (19 ± 5 min).
CONCLUSIONS: The reading time for overview with express-selected mode was significantly lower than for overview with auto-speed-adjusted mode, with few unrecognised clinically significant lesions. These new playback systems can efficaciously reduce reading times of CE but need further evaluation in prospective multicentre studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22327240     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2074-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of RAPID(®) 5 Access software for examination of capsule endoscopies and reading of the capsule by an endoscopy nurse.

Authors:  Akiko Shiotani; Keisuke Honda; Makiko Kawakami; Takahisa Murao; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Ken-Ichi Tarumi; Hiroaki Kusunoki; Jiro Hata; Ken Haruma
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Guidelines on small bowel enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in adults.

Authors:  R Sidhu; D S Sanders; A J Morris; M E McAlindon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Diagnostic characteristics of given video capsule endoscopy in diagnosis of celiac disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary; Hien Huynh; Ben Vandermeer
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Can we reduce capsule endoscopy reading times?

Authors:  Jessie Westerhof; Jan J Koornstra; Rinse K Weersma
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Feasibility and diagnostic utility of video capsule endoscopy for the detection of small bowel polyps in patients with hereditary polyposis syndromes.

Authors:  Karsten Schulmann; Stephan Hollerbach; Katja Kraus; Jörg Willert; Tilman Vogel; Gabriela Möslein; Christian Pox; Markus Reiser; Anke Reinacher-Schick; Wolff Schmiegel
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Stuart L Triester; Jonathan A Leighton; Grigoris I Leontiadis; David E Fleischer; Amy K Hara; Russell I Heigh; Arthur D Shiff; Virender K Sharma
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Stuart L Triester; Jonathan A Leighton; Grigoris I Leontiadis; Suryakanth R Gurudu; David E Fleischer; Amy K Hara; Russell I Heigh; Arthur D Shiff; Virender K Sharma
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Diagnosis of small-bowel pathology using paired capsule endoscopy with two different devices: a randomized study.

Authors:  D Hartmann; A Eickhoff; U Damian; J F Riemann
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  A multicenter randomized comparison of the Endocapsule and the Pillcam SB.

Authors:  David R Cave; David E Fleischer; Jonathan A Leighton; Douglas O Faigel; Russell I Heigh; Virender K Sharma; Christopher J Gostout; Elizabeth Rajan; Klaus Mergener; Anne Foley; Michael Lee; Kanishka Bhattacharya
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Performance characteristics of the suspected blood indicator feature in capsule endoscopy according to indication for study.

Authors:  Jonathan M Buscaglia; Samuel A Giday; Sergey V Kantsevoy; John O Clarke; Priscilla Magno; Elaine Yong; Gerard E Mullin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a ten-point contemporary review.

Authors:  Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Emanuele Rondonotti; Alexandros Karargyris
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Continuing challenges in the diagnosis and management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Veronica Baptista; Neil Marya; Anupam Singh; Abbas Rupawala; Bilal Gondal; David Cave
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15

Review 3.  Optimising the performance and interpretation of small bowel capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-16

4.  Advances in Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Ryan Scott; Robert Enns
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-09

Review 5.  Capsule endoscopy of the small bowel.

Authors:  Mark E McAlindon; Hey-Long Ching; Diana Yung; Reena Sidhu; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Development of a Deep-Learning Algorithm for Small Bowel-Lesion Detection and a Study of the Improvement in the False-Positive Rate.

Authors:  Naoki Hosoe; Tomofumi Horie; Anna Tojo; Hinako Sakurai; Yukie Hayashi; Kenji Jose-Luis Limpias Kamiya; Tomohisa Sujino; Kaoru Takabayashi; Haruhiko Ogata; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 7.  Challenges and Future of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Saurin; Nicolas Beneche; Christine Chambon; Mathieu Pioche
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 8.  The Role of Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn's Disease: A Review.

Authors:  Oladipo Odeyinka; Rasha Alhashimi; Sankeerth Thoota; Tejaswini Ashok; Vishnu Palyam; Ahmad T Azam; Ibrahim Sange
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-25

9.  Evaluation of performance of the Omni mode for detecting video capsule endoscopy images: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Naoki Hosoe; Kenji Watanabe; Takako Miyazaki; Masaaki Shimatani; Takahiro Wakamatsu; Kazuichi Okazaki; Motohiro Esaki; Takayuki Matsumoto; Takayuki Abe; Takanori Kanai; Kazuo Ohtsuka; Mamoru Watanabe; Keiichi Ikeda; Hisao Tajiri; Naoki Ohmiya; Masanao Nakamura; Hidemi Goto; Tomoyuki Tsujikawa; Haruhiko Ogata
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-08-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.