Literature DB >> 22326800

Building a robust, scalable and standards-driven infrastructure for secondary use of EHR data: the SHARPn project.

Susan Rea1, Jyotishman Pathak, Guergana Savova, Thomas A Oniki, Les Westberg, Calvin E Beebe, Cui Tao, Craig G Parker, Peter J Haug, Stanley M Huff, Christopher G Chute.   

Abstract

The Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Program, established by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology in 2010 supports research findings that remove barriers for increased adoption of health IT. The improvements envisioned by the SHARP Area 4 Consortium (SHARPn) will enable the use of the electronic health record (EHR) for secondary purposes, such as care process and outcomes improvement, biomedical research and epidemiologic monitoring of the nation's health. One of the primary informatics problem areas in this endeavor is the standardization of disparate health data from the nation's many health care organizations and providers. The SHARPn team is developing open source services and components to support the ubiquitous exchange, sharing and reuse or 'liquidity' of operational clinical data stored in electronic health records. One year into the design and development of the SHARPn framework, we demonstrated end to end data flow and a prototype SHARPn platform, using thousands of patient electronic records sourced from two large healthcare organizations: Mayo Clinic and Intermountain Healthcare. The platform was deployed to (1) receive source EHR data in several formats, (2) generate structured data from EHR narrative text, and (3) normalize the EHR data using common detailed clinical models and Consolidated Health Informatics standard terminologies, which were (4) accessed by a phenotyping service using normalized data specifications. The architecture of this prototype SHARPn platform is presented. The EHR data throughput demonstration showed success in normalizing native EHR data, both structured and narrative, from two independent organizations and EHR systems. Based on the demonstration, observed challenges for standardization of EHR data for interoperable secondary use are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22326800      PMCID: PMC4905766          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  21 in total

1.  Integrating detailed clinical models into application development tools.

Authors:  Stanley M Huff; Roberto A Rocha; Joseph F Coyle; Scott P Narus
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

2.  Detailed clinical models for sharable, executable guidelines.

Authors:  Craig G Parker; Roberto A Rocha; James R Campbell; Samson W Tu; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

3.  Medical data abstractionism: fitting an EMR to radically evolving medical information systems.

Authors:  David J Steiner; Joseph F Coyle; Beatriz H S C Rocha; Peter Haug; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

4.  Connecting information to improve health.

Authors:  W Ed Hammond; Christopher Bailey; Philippe Boucher; Mark Spohr; Patrick Whitaker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Comparing ICD9-encoded diagnoses and NLP-processed discharge summaries for clinical trials pre-screening: a case study.

Authors:  Li Li; Herbert S Chase; Chintan O Patel; Carol Friedman; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

6.  Adding value to the electronic health record through secondary use of data for quality assurance, research, and surveillance.

Authors:  William R Hersh
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Linking a medical vocabulary to a clinical data model using Abstract Syntax Notation 1.

Authors:  S M Huff; R A Rocha; H R Solbrig; M W Barnes; S P Schrank; M Smith
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Fern FitzHenry; Michael E Matheny; Nancy Gentry; Kristen L Kotter; Kimberly Crimin; Robert S Dittus; Amy K Rosen; Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Rongling Li; Daniel R Masys; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Jeffery P Struewing; Wendy A Wolf
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  An event model of medical information representation.

Authors:  S M Huff; R A Rocha; B E Bray; H R Warner; P J Haug
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  74 in total

1.  Clinical element models in the SHARPn consortium.

Authors:  Thomas A Oniki; Ning Zhuo; Calvin E Beebe; Hongfang Liu; Joseph F Coyle; Craig G Parker; Harold R Solbrig; Kyle Marchant; Vinod C Kaggal; Christopher G Chute; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Syntactic parsing of clinical text: guideline and corpus development with handling ill-formed sentences.

Authors:  Jung-wei Fan; Elly W Yang; Min Jiang; Rashmi Prasad; Richard M Loomis; Daniel S Zisook; Josh C Denny; Hua Xu; Yang Huang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Electronic health records based phenotyping in next-generation clinical trials: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory.

Authors:  Rachel L Richesson; W Ed Hammond; Meredith Nahm; Douglas Wixted; Gregory E Simon; Jennifer G Robinson; Alan E Bauck; Denise Cifelli; Michelle M Smerek; John Dickerson; Reesa L Laws; Rosemary A Madigan; Shelley A Rusincovitch; Cynthia Kluchar; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Defining a comprehensive verotype using electronic health records for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; George Hripcsak; Yufeng Shen; Wendy K Chung; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Modeling asynchronous event sequences with RNNs.

Authors:  Stephen Wu; Sijia Liu; Sunghwan Sohn; Sungrim Moon; Chung-Il Wi; Young Juhn; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  R-U policy frontiers for health data de-identification.

Authors:  Weiyi Xia; Raymond Heatherly; Xiaofeng Ding; Jiuyong Li; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  An integrated, ontology-driven approach to constructing observational databases for research.

Authors:  William Hsu; Nestor R Gonzalez; Aichi Chien; J Pablo Villablanca; Päivi Pajukanta; Fernando Viñuela; Alex A T Bui
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 8.  Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kory Kreimeyer; Matthew Foster; Abhishek Pandey; Nina Arya; Gwendolyn Halford; Sandra F Jones; Richard Forshee; Mark Walderhaug; Taxiarchis Botsis
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Combining infobuttons and semantic web rules for identifying patterns and delivering highly-personalized education materials.

Authors:  Nathan C Hulse; Jie Long; Cui Tao
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

10.  Patient-centered care requires a patient-oriented workflow model.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozkaynak; Patricia Flatley Brennan; David A Hanauer; Sharon Johnson; Jos Aarts; Kai Zheng; Saira N Haque
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.