Literature DB >> 26568604

Clinical element models in the SHARPn consortium.

Thomas A Oniki1, Ning Zhuo2, Calvin E Beebe3, Hongfang Liu3, Joseph F Coyle2, Craig G Parker2, Harold R Solbrig3, Kyle Marchant4, Vinod C Kaggal3, Christopher G Chute3, Stanley M Huff5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the Strategic Health IT Advanced Research Project area four (SHARPn) was to develop open-source tools that could be used for the normalization of electronic health record (EHR) data for secondary use--specifically, for high throughput phenotyping. We describe the role of Intermountain Healthcare's Clinical Element Models ([CEMs] Intermountain Healthcare Health Services, Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah) as normalization "targets" within the project.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intermountain's CEMs were either repurposed or created for the SHARPn project. A CEM describes "valid" structure and semantics for a particular kind of clinical data. CEMs are expressed in a computable syntax that can be compiled into implementation artifacts. The modeling team and SHARPn colleagues agilely gathered requirements and developed and refined models.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight "statement" models (analogous to "classes") and numerous "component" CEMs and their associated terminology were repurposed or developed to satisfy SHARPn high throughput phenotyping requirements. Model (structural) mappings and terminology (semantic) mappings were also created. Source data instances were normalized to CEM-conformant data and stored in CEM instance databases. A model browser and request site were built to facilitate the development. DISCUSSION: The modeling efforts demonstrated the need to address context differences and granularity choices and highlighted the inevitability of iso-semantic models. The need for content expertise and "intelligent" content tooling was also underscored. We discuss scalability and sustainability expectations for a CEM-based approach and describe the place of CEMs relative to other current efforts.
CONCLUSIONS: The SHARPn effort demonstrated the normalization and secondary use of EHR data. CEMs proved capable of capturing data originating from a variety of sources within the normalization pipeline and serving as suitable normalization targets.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  controlled; electronic health records/standards; health information systems/standards; information storage and retrieval; semantics; vocabulary

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26568604      PMCID: PMC6283078          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  16 in total

1.  Standards for detailed clinical models as the basis for medical data exchange and decision support.

Authors:  Joseph F Coyle; Angelo Rossi Mori; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Integrating detailed clinical models into application development tools.

Authors:  Stanley M Huff; Roberto A Rocha; Joseph F Coyle; Scott P Narus
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

3.  Detailed clinical models for sharable, executable guidelines.

Authors:  Craig G Parker; Roberto A Rocha; James R Campbell; Samson W Tu; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

4.  Archetypes and the EHR.

Authors:  Thomas Beale
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2003

5.  Federating clinical data from six pediatric hospitals: process and initial results from the PHIS+ Consortium.

Authors:  Scott P Narus; Rajendu Srivastava; Ramkiran Gouripeddi; Oren E Livne; Peter Mo; Jonathan P Bickel; David de Regt; Joseph W Hales; Eric Kirkendall; Richard L Stepanek; Jamie Toth; Ron Keren
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

6.  ONC Health IT Certification Program: Enhanced Oversight and Accountability. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-10-19

7.  Lessons learned in detailed clinical modeling at Intermountain Healthcare.

Authors:  Thomas A Oniki; Joseph F Coyle; Craig G Parker; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Development and evaluation of a common data model enabling active drug safety surveillance using disparate healthcare databases.

Authors:  Stephanie J Reisinger; Patrick B Ryan; Donald J O'Hara; Gregory E Powell; Jeffery L Painter; Edward N Pattishall; Jonathan A Morris
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Normalization and standardization of electronic health records for high-throughput phenotyping: the SHARPn consortium.

Authors:  Jyotishman Pathak; Kent R Bailey; Calvin E Beebe; Steven Bethard; David C Carrell; Pei J Chen; Dmitriy Dligach; Cory M Endle; Lacey A Hart; Peter J Haug; Stanley M Huff; Vinod C Kaggal; Dingcheng Li; Hongfang Liu; Kyle Marchant; James Masanz; Timothy Miller; Thomas A Oniki; Martha Palmer; Kevin J Peterson; Susan Rea; Guergana K Savova; Craig R Stancl; Sunghwan Sohn; Harold R Solbrig; Dale B Suesse; Cui Tao; David P Taylor; Les Westberg; Stephen Wu; Ning Zhuo; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Detailed clinical models: a review.

Authors:  William Goossen; Anneke Goossen-Baremans; Michael van der Zel
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2010-12-31
View more
  8 in total

1.  Evolution of an Implementation-Ready Interprofessional Pain Assessment Reference Model.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Karen Bavuso; Mary Swenson; Christine Suchecki; Perry Mar; Roberto A Rocha
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Lessons Learned in Creating Interoperable Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources Profiles for Large-Scale Public Health Programs.

Authors:  Susan A Matney; Bret Heale; Steve Hasley; Emily Decker; Brittni Frederiksen; Nathan Davis; Patrick Langford; Nadia Ramey; Stanley M Huff
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Prioritization and Refinement of Clinical Data Elements within EHR Systems.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; Emily Gesner; Perry L Mar; Doreen M Colburn; Roberto A Rocha
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  The Role of Free/Libre and Open Source Software in Learning Health Systems.

Authors:  C Paton; T Karopka
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  iT2DMS: a Standard-Based Diabetic Disease Data Repository and its Pilot Experiment on Diabetic Retinopathy Phenotyping and Examination Results Integration.

Authors:  Huiqun Wu; Yufang Wei; Yujuan Shang; Wei Shi; Lei Wang; Jingjing Li; Aimin Sang; Lili Shi; Kui Jiang; Jiancheng Dong
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Deep Phenotyping of Chinese Electronic Health Records by Recognizing Linguistic Patterns of Phenotypic Narratives With a Sequence Motif Discovery Tool: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Authors:  Shicheng Li; Lizong Deng; Xu Zhang; Luming Chen; Tao Yang; Yifan Qi; Taijiao Jiang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 7.076

7.  An ontology-aware integration of clinical models, terminologies and guidelines: an exploratory study of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA).

Authors:  Haitham Maarouf; María Taboada; Hadriana Rodriguez; Manuel Arias; Ángel Sesar; María Jesús Sobrido
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  An Efficient, Clinically-Natural Electronic Medical Record System that Produces Computable Data.

Authors:  Brent C James; David P Edwards; Alan F James; Richard L Bradshaw; Keith S White; Chris Wood; Stan Huff
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-12-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.