INTRODUCTION: Inter-hospital transport of critically ill patients is increasing. When performed by specialized retrieval teams there are less adverse events compared to transport by ambulance. These transports are performed with technical equipment also used in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). As a consequence technical problems may arise and have to be dealt with on the road. In this study, all technical problems encountered while transporting patients with our mobile intensive care unit service (MICU) were evaluated. METHODS: From March 2009 until August 2011 all transports were reviewed for technical problems. The cause, solution and, where relevant, its influence on protocol were stated. RESULTS: In this period of 30 months, 353 patients were transported. In total 55 technical problems were encountered. We provide examples of how they influenced transport and how they may be resolved. CONCLUSION: The use of technical equipment is part of intensive care medicine. Wherever this kind of equipment is used, technical problems will occur. During inter-hospital transports, without extra personnel or technical assistance, the transport team is dependent on its own ability to resolve these problems. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of having some technical understanding of the equipment used and the importance of training to anticipate, prevent and resolve technical problems. Being an outstanding intensivist on the ICU does not necessarily mean being qualified for transporting the critically ill as well. Although these are lessons derived from inter-hospital transport, they may also apply to intra-hospital transport.
INTRODUCTION: Inter-hospital transport of critically illpatients is increasing. When performed by specialized retrieval teams there are less adverse events compared to transport by ambulance. These transports are performed with technical equipment also used in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). As a consequence technical problems may arise and have to be dealt with on the road. In this study, all technical problems encountered while transporting patients with our mobile intensive care unit service (MICU) were evaluated. METHODS: From March 2009 until August 2011 all transports were reviewed for technical problems. The cause, solution and, where relevant, its influence on protocol were stated. RESULTS: In this period of 30 months, 353 patients were transported. In total 55 technical problems were encountered. We provide examples of how they influenced transport and how they may be resolved. CONCLUSION: The use of technical equipment is part of intensive care medicine. Wherever this kind of equipment is used, technical problems will occur. During inter-hospital transports, without extra personnel or technical assistance, the transport team is dependent on its own ability to resolve these problems. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of having some technical understanding of the equipment used and the importance of training to anticipate, prevent and resolve technical problems. Being an outstanding intensivist on the ICU does not necessarily mean being qualified for transporting the critically ill as well. Although these are lessons derived from inter-hospital transport, they may also apply to intra-hospital transport.
Authors: M Gebremichael; U Borg; N M Habashi; C Cottingham; L Cunsolo; M McCunn; H N Reynolds Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: H G Kreeftenberg; J J Ligtenberg; L G Arnold; T S van der Werf; J E Tulleken; J G Zijlstra Journal: Neth J Med Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: Edward J Dunn; Peter D Mills; Julia Neily; Michael D Crittenden; Amy L Carmack; James P Bagian Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2007-06
Authors: Ursula Beckmann; Donna M Gillies; Sean M Berenholtz; Albert W Wu; Peter Pronovost Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-02-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jack J M Ligtenberg; L Gert Arnold; Ymkje Stienstra; Tjip S van der Werf; John H J M Meertens; Jaap E Tulleken; Jan G Zijlstra Journal: Crit Care Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Erik Jan van Lieshout; Rien de Vos; Jan M Binnekade; Rob de Haan; Marcus J Schultz; Margreeth B Vroom Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Joep M Droogh; Laurens Reinke; Gert Jan Snel; Brian Mouthaan; Michel M R F Struys; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Frederik Keus; Jan G Zijlstra Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Marcie Gawel; Beth Emerson; John S Giuliano; Alana Rosenberg; Karl E Minges; Shelli Feder; Pina Violano; Patricia Morrell; Judy Petersen; Emily Christison-Lagay; Marc Auerbach Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Thierry Lentz; Charles Groizard; Abel Colomes; Anna Ozguler; Michel Baer; Thomas Loeb Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 2.953