Literature DB >> 10667503

Interhospital transport of the extremely ill patient: the mobile intensive care unit.

M Gebremichael1, U Borg, N M Habashi, C Cottingham, L Cunsolo, M McCunn, H N Reynolds.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients may require specialized care that is offered only at tertiary referral centers. As regionalization and specialization of critical care become more common, transportation of critically ill patients must be refined. Transportation of critically ill patients within a hospital, much less outside the hospital, is often deemed unsafe because of medical instability. We report, here, our results from 2 yrs' experience of transporting extremely ill patients with respiratory failure via a ground critical care transport service.
METHODS: A mobile intensive care unit was equipped and staffed to nearly recreate the intensive care environment. Staffing included a physician, nurse, respiratory therapist, and driver--all with extensive critical care experience. The mobile intensive care unit was equipped with a full pharmacy, advanced ventilatory equipment, and capability for full invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Data were analyzed by retrospective review. The predicted mortality rate, based on Pao2/Fio2 ratios, was compared with the actual mortality rate.
RESULTS: During a 2-yr period, 39 critically ill patients were transported. Thirty-six of the 39 were candidates for extracorporeal lung assist, with a mean positive end-expiratory pressure requirement of 15.9, a mean Fio2 requirement of .93, and a mean Pao2/Fio2 ratio of 59.8. Pulmonary arterial catheters and peripheral arterial catheters were in place in 66.6% and 72% of patients, respectively. Vasoactive medications were being infused in 56%, and 74% were receiving medical paralytics. One patient died during movement from the bed to the transport gurney. Other than one episode of transient hypotension, there were no complications or untoward outcomes related to transport. Unique therapeutic interventions were performed at the receiving facility on 34 of 39 patients. The predicted mortality rate, based on indicators of lung dysfunction, was 68% to 100%; the actual subsequent hospital mortality rate was 43%.
CONCLUSIONS: When a mobile intensive care unit is properly staffed and equipped and patient stabilization is performed before transfer, severely ill patients with respiratory failure can be transferred safely. For patients with respiratory failure, there may be a survival advantage in transfer to regional centers of expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10667503     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  23 in total

1.  Patient Transport Unit for Aeromedical Evacuation.

Authors:  M C Joshi; M S Bedi; Gspn Chowdary; R M Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  Inter-hospital transport of critically ill patients; expect surprises.

Authors:  Joep M Droogh; Marije Smit; Jakob Hut; Ronald de Vos; Jack J M Ligtenberg; Jan G Zijlstra
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Extracorporeal life support for management of refractory cardiac or respiratory failure: initial experience in a tertiary centre.

Authors:  Adriano Peris; Giovanni Cianchi; Simona Biondi; Manuela Bonizzoli; Andrea Pasquini; Massimo Bonacchi; Marco Ciapetti; Giovanni Zagli; Simona Bacci; Chiara Lazzeri; Pasquale Bernardo; Erminia Mascitelli; Guido Sani; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Benoît Fanara; Cyril Manzon; Olivier Barbot; Thibaut Desmettre; Gilles Capellier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Evaluation of a risk score for interhospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Markakis; M Dalezios; C Chatzicostas; A Chalkiadaki; K Politi; P J Agouridakis
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Incidents relating to the intra-hospital transfer of critically ill patients. An analysis of the reports submitted to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care.

Authors:  Ursula Beckmann; Donna M Gillies; Sean M Berenholtz; Albert W Wu; Peter Pronovost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Mobile Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Teams: The North American Versus the European Experience.

Authors:  Adambeke Nwozuzu; Manuel L Fontes; Robert B Schonberger
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Quality of interhospital transport of the critically ill: impact of a Mobile Intensive Care Unit with a specialized retrieval team.

Authors:  Janke S Wiegersma; Joep M Droogh; Jan G Zijlstra; Janneke Fokkema; Jack J M Ligtenberg
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Pro/con debate: do the benefits of regionalized critical care delivery outweigh the risks of interfacility patient transport?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Singh; Russell D MacDonald
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units.

Authors:  Onnen Moerer; Enno Plock; Uchenna Mgbor; Alexandra Schmid; Heinz Schneider; Manfred Bernd Wischnewsky; Hilmar Burchardi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.