Literature DB >> 22325772

Blind testing of routine, fully automated determination of protein structures from NMR data.

Antonio Rosato1, James M Aramini, Cheryl Arrowsmith, Anurag Bagaria, David Baker, Andrea Cavalli, Jurgen F Doreleijers, Alexander Eletsky, Andrea Giachetti, Paul Guerry, Aleksandras Gutmanas, Peter Güntert, Yunfen He, Torsten Herrmann, Yuanpeng J Huang, Victor Jaravine, Hendrik R A Jonker, Michael A Kennedy, Oliver F Lange, Gaohua Liu, Thérèse E Malliavin, Rajeswari Mani, Binchen Mao, Gaetano T Montelione, Michael Nilges, Paolo Rossi, Gijs van der Schot, Harald Schwalbe, Thomas A Szyperski, Michele Vendruscolo, Robert Vernon, Wim F Vranken, Sjoerd de Vries, Geerten W Vuister, Bin Wu, Yunhuang Yang, Alexandre M J J Bonvin.   

Abstract

The protocols currently used for protein structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) depend on the determination of a large number of upper distance limits for proton-proton pairs. Typically, this task is performed manually by an experienced researcher rather than automatically by using a specific computer program. To assess whether it is indeed possible to generate in a fully automated manner NMR structures adequate for deposition in the Protein Data Bank, we gathered 10 experimental data sets with unassigned nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) peak lists for various proteins of unknown structure, computed structures for each of them using different, fully automatic programs, and compared the results to each other and to the manually solved reference structures that were not available at the time the data were provided. This constitutes a stringent "blind" assessment similar to the CASP and CAPRI initiatives. This study demonstrates the feasibility of routine, fully automated protein structure determination by NMR.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22325772      PMCID: PMC3609704          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  48 in total

1.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

2.  Modeling errors in NOE data with a log-normal distribution improves the quality of NMR structures.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rieping; Michael Habeck; Michael Nilges
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Protein NMR recall, precision, and F-measure scores (RPF scores): structure quality assessment measures based on information retrieval statistics.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Robert Powers; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  RECOORD: a recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank.

Authors:  Aart J Nederveen; Jurgen F Doreleijers; Wim Vranken; Zachary Miller; Chris A E M Spronk; Sander B Nabuurs; Peter Güntert; Miron Livny; John L Markley; Michael Nilges; Eldon L Ulrich; Robert Kaptein; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-06-01

5.  A topology-constrained distance network algorithm for protein structure determination from NOESY data.

Authors:  Yuanpeng Janet Huang; Roberto Tejero; Robert Powers; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-15

6.  Weighting of experimental evidence in macromolecular structure determination.

Authors:  Michael Habeck; Wolfgang Rieping; Michael Nilges
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Structure calculation of biological macromolecules from NMR data.

Authors:  P Güntert
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.318

8.  Linear analysis of carbon-13 chemical shift differences and its application to the detection and correction of errors in referencing and spin system identifications.

Authors:  Liya Wang; Hamid R Eghbalnia; Arash Bahrami; John L Markley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Traditional biomolecular structure determination by NMR spectroscopy allows for major errors.

Authors:  Sander B Nabuurs; Chris A E M Spronk; Geerten W Vuister; Gert Vriend
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  45 in total

1.  Simultaneous single-structure and bundle representation of protein NMR structures in torsion angle space.

Authors:  Daniel Gottstein; Donata K Kirchner; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information.

Authors:  James M Thompson; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Gaohua Liu; Paolo Rossi; Yuefeng Tang; Jeffrey L Mills; Thomas Szyperski; Gaetano T Montelione; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Improving 3D structure prediction from chemical shift data.

Authors:  Gijs van der Schot; Zaiyong Zhang; Robert Vernon; Yang Shen; Wim F Vranken; David Baker; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Oliver F Lange
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Improved chemical shift based fragment selection for CS-Rosetta using Rosetta3 fragment picker.

Authors:  Robert Vernon; Yang Shen; David Baker; Oliver F Lange
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Physics-based method to validate and repair flaws in protein structures.

Authors:  Osvaldo A Martin; Yelena A Arnautova; Alejandro A Icazatti; Harold A Scheraga; Jorge A Vila
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Reliability of exclusively NOESY-based automated resonance assignment and structure determination of proteins.

Authors:  Elena Schmidt; Peter Güntert
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Analysis of the performance of the CHESHIRE and YAPP methods at CASD-NMR round 3.

Authors:  Andrea Cavalli; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  CASD-NMR 2: robust and accurate unsupervised analysis of raw NOESY spectra and protein structure determination with UNIO.

Authors:  Paul Guerry; Viet Dung Duong; Torsten Herrmann
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Binchen Mao; James M Aramini; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

10.  HASH: a program to accurately predict protein Hα shifts from neighboring backbone shifts.

Authors:  Jianyang Zeng; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.