BACKGROUND: There is no validated neuroimaging marker for quantifying brain edema. We sought to test whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based metrics would reliably change during the early subacute period in a manner consistent with edema and whether they would correlate with relevant clinical endpoints. METHODS: Serial MRI studies from patients in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial with initial diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion volume >82 cm(3) were analyzed. Two independent readers outlined the hemisphere and lateral ventricle on the involved side and calculated respective volumes at baseline and days 3 to 5. We assessed interrater agreement, volume change between scans, and the association of volume change with early neurologic deterioration (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score worsening of ≥ 4 points), a 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 4, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 12 patients who met study criteria, average baseline and follow-up DWI lesion size was 138 cm(3) and 234 cm(3), respectively. The mean time to follow-up MRI was 62 hours. Concordance correlation coefficients between readers were >0.90 for both hemisphere and ventricle volume assessment. Mean percent hemisphere volume increase was 16.2 ± 8.3% (P < .0001), and the mean percent ventricle volume decrease was 45.6 ± 16.9% (P < .001). Percent hemisphere growth predicted early neurologic deterioration (area under the curve [AUC] 0.92; P = .0005) and 90-day mRS 0 to 4 (AUC 0.80; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis of severe ischemic stroke patients, statistically significant changes in hemisphere and ventricular volumes within the first week are consistent with expected changes of cerebral edema. MRI-based analysis of hemisphere growth appears to be a suitable biomarker for edema formation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There is no validated neuroimaging marker for quantifying brain edema. We sought to test whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based metrics would reliably change during the early subacute period in a manner consistent with edema and whether they would correlate with relevant clinical endpoints. METHODS: Serial MRI studies from patients in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial with initial diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion volume >82 cm(3) were analyzed. Two independent readers outlined the hemisphere and lateral ventricle on the involved side and calculated respective volumes at baseline and days 3 to 5. We assessed interrater agreement, volume change between scans, and the association of volume change with early neurologic deterioration (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score worsening of ≥ 4 points), a 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 4, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 12 patients who met study criteria, average baseline and follow-up DWI lesion size was 138 cm(3) and 234 cm(3), respectively. The mean time to follow-up MRI was 62 hours. Concordance correlation coefficients between readers were >0.90 for both hemisphere and ventricle volume assessment. Mean percent hemisphere volume increase was 16.2 ± 8.3% (P < .0001), and the mean percent ventricle volume decrease was 45.6 ± 16.9% (P < .001). Percent hemisphere growth predicted early neurologic deterioration (area under the curve [AUC] 0.92; P = .0005) and 90-day mRS 0 to 4 (AUC 0.80; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis of severe ischemic strokepatients, statistically significant changes in hemisphere and ventricular volumes within the first week are consistent with expected changes of cerebral edema. MRI-based analysis of hemisphere growth appears to be a suitable biomarker for edema formation.
Authors: Götz Thomalla; Frank Hartmann; Eric Juettler; Oliver C Singer; Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt; Martin Köhrmann; Jan F Kersten; Anna Krützelmann; Marek C Humpich; Jan Sobesky; Christian Gerloff; Arno Villringer; Jens Fiehler; Tobias Neumann-Haefelin; Peter D Schellinger; Joachim Röther Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Chitra Venkatasubramanian; Michael Mlynash; Anna Finley-Caulfield; Irina Eyngorn; Rajalakshmi Kalimuthu; R W Snider; Christine Anne Wijman Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A W Vorbrodt; A S Lossinsky; H M Wisniewski; R Suzuki; T Yamaguchi; H Masaoka; I Klatzo Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 1985 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Mark W Parsons; Christopher Levi; Kenneth S Butcher; Andre Peeters; P Alan Barber; Christopher Bladin; Deidre A De Silva; Graham Byrnes; Jonathan B Chalk; John N Fink; Thomas E Kimber; David Schultz; Peter J Hand; Judith Frayne; Graeme Hankey; Keith Muir; Richard Gerraty; Brian M Tress; Patricia M Desmond Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Adnan I Qureshi; Jose I Suarez; Abutaher M Yahia; Yousef Mohammad; Guven Uzun; M Fareed K Suri; Osama O Zaidat; Cenk Ayata; Zulfiqar Ali; Robert J Wityk Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja; Soren Christensen; Matus Straka; Manabu Inoue; Maarten G Lansberg; Michael Mlynash; Roland Bammer; Mark W Parsons; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Gregory W Albers Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Ann-Christin Ostwaldt; Thomas W K Battey; Hannah J Irvine; Bruce C V Campbell; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; W Taylor Kimberly Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Kevin N Sheth; W Taylor Kimberly; Jordan J Elm; Thomas A Kent; Albert J Yoo; Götz Thomalla; Bruce Campbell; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Gregory W Albers; Sven Jacobson; Gregory del Zoppo; J Marc Simard; Barney J Stern; Pitchaiah Mandava Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Pongpat Vorasayan; Matthew B Bevers; Lauren A Beslow; Gordon Sze; Bradley J Molyneaux; Holly E Hinson; J Marc Simard; Rüdiger von Kummer; Kevin N Sheth; W Taylor Kimberly Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: W Taylor Kimberly; Bruna Garbugio Dutra; Anna M M Boers; Heitor C B R Alves; Olvert A Berkhemer; Lucie van den Berg; Kevin N Sheth; Yvo B W E M Roos; Aad van der Lugt; Ludo F M Beenen; Diederik W J Dippel; Wim H van Zwam; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Hester F Lingsma; Henk Marquering; Charles B L M Majoie Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Kevin N Sheth; W Taylor Kimberly; Jordan J Elm; Thomas A Kent; Pitchaiah Mandava; Albert J Yoo; Götz Thomalla; Bruce Campbell; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis; Gregory W Albers; Sven Jacobson; J Marc Simard; Barney J Stern Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 7.914