Rajat Dhar1, Kristy Yuan2, Tobias Kulik2, Yasheng Chen3, Laura Heitsch4, Hongyu An3, Andria Ford2, Jin-Moo Lee2. 1. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, USA. dharr@neuro.wustl.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malignant cerebral edema (CED) complicates at least 20 % of large hemispheric infarcts (LHI) and may result in neurological deterioration or death. Midline shift (MLS) is a standard but crude measure of edema severity. We propose that volumetric analysis of shifts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) over time provides a reliable means of quantifying the spectrum of edema severity after LHI. METHODS: We identified 38 patients from 2008 to 2014 with NIHSS ≥8, baseline CT <6 h after stroke onset, at least 1 follow-up (FU) CT, and no parenchymal hematoma. The volumes of CSF (sulci, ventricles, and cisterns) ipsilateral (IL) and contralateral (CL) to infarct on baseline and FU CTs were quantified by manually assisted outlining with MIPAV image analysis software, as was infarct volume and MLS on FU CTs. Percentage change in CSF volumes (∆CSF) from baseline to FU scans was correlated with MLS and compared in those with vs. without malignant edema (defined as hemicraniectomy, osmotic therapy, or death/neurological deterioration with MLS ≥5 mm). RESULTS: 11 of 38 subjects (29 %) developed malignant edema. Neither baseline NIHSS nor CSF volume differed between those with and without edema (median NIHSS 18 vs. 13, p = 0.12, CSF volume 102 vs. 124 ml, p = 0.16). Inter-rater reliability for CSF measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97). ∆CSF correlated strongly with MLS at peak edema (r = -0.75), even adjusting for infarct volume (p = 0.009). ∆CSF was also greater in those with malignant edema [-55 % (IQR -49 to -62) vs. -36 % (-27 to -45), p = 0.004]. ∆CSF was the greatest within IL sulci [-97 % (-86 to -99) vs. -71 % (-41 to -79), p = 0.002] but also significantly greater within CL sulci in those with malignant edema [-50 % (-29 to -65) vs. -25 % (0 to -31), p = 0.014]. More than half this CSF volume reduction occurred by the time of first FU CT around 24 h after stroke, while MLS rose later. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric CSF analysis reliably quantifies CED and distinguishes those with malignant edema and MLS from those with a more benign course after LHI. ∆CSF may provide an earlier and more sensitive indicator of edema severity across a broader dynamic range than MLS.
BACKGROUND:Malignant cerebral edema (CED) complicates at least 20 % of large hemispheric infarcts (LHI) and may result in neurological deterioration or death. Midline shift (MLS) is a standard but crude measure of edema severity. We propose that volumetric analysis of shifts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) over time provides a reliable means of quantifying the spectrum of edema severity after LHI. METHODS: We identified 38 patients from 2008 to 2014 with NIHSS ≥8, baseline CT <6 h after stroke onset, at least 1 follow-up (FU) CT, and no parenchymal hematoma. The volumes of CSF (sulci, ventricles, and cisterns) ipsilateral (IL) and contralateral (CL) to infarct on baseline and FU CTs were quantified by manually assisted outlining with MIPAV image analysis software, as was infarct volume and MLS on FU CTs. Percentage change in CSF volumes (∆CSF) from baseline to FU scans was correlated with MLS and compared in those with vs. without malignant edema (defined as hemicraniectomy, osmotic therapy, or death/neurological deterioration with MLS ≥5 mm). RESULTS: 11 of 38 subjects (29 %) developed malignant edema. Neither baseline NIHSS nor CSF volume differed between those with and without edema (median NIHSS 18 vs. 13, p = 0.12, CSF volume 102 vs. 124 ml, p = 0.16). Inter-rater reliability for CSF measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97). ∆CSF correlated strongly with MLS at peak edema (r = -0.75), even adjusting for infarct volume (p = 0.009). ∆CSF was also greater in those with malignant edema [-55 % (IQR -49 to -62) vs. -36 % (-27 to -45), p = 0.004]. ∆CSF was the greatest within IL sulci [-97 % (-86 to -99) vs. -71 % (-41 to -79), p = 0.002] but also significantly greater within CL sulci in those with malignant edema [-50 % (-29 to -65) vs. -25 % (0 to -31), p = 0.014]. More than half this CSF volume reduction occurred by the time of first FU CT around 24 h after stroke, while MLS rose later. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric CSF analysis reliably quantifies CED and distinguishes those with malignant edema and MLS from those with a more benign course after LHI. ∆CSF may provide an earlier and more sensitive indicator of edema severity across a broader dynamic range than MLS.
Authors: M Fiorelli; S Bastianello; R von Kummer; G J del Zoppo; V Larrue; E Lesaffre; A P Ringleb; S Lorenzano; C Manelfe; L Bozzao Journal: Stroke Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: J H Pexman; P A Barber; M D Hill; R J Sevick; A M Demchuk; M E Hudon; W Y Hu; A M Buchan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Katayoun Vahedi; Jeannette Hofmeijer; Eric Juettler; Eric Vicaut; Bernard George; Ale Algra; G Johan Amelink; Peter Schmiedeck; Stefan Schwab; Peter M Rothwell; Marie-Germaine Bousser; H Bart van der Worp; Werner Hacke Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ann-Christin Ostwaldt; Thomas W K Battey; Hannah J Irvine; Bruce C V Campbell; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; W Taylor Kimberly Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Pongpat Vorasayan; Matthew B Bevers; Lauren A Beslow; Gordon Sze; Bradley J Molyneaux; Holly E Hinson; J Marc Simard; Rüdiger von Kummer; Kevin N Sheth; W Taylor Kimberly Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Rajat Dhar; Yasheng Chen; Ali Hamzehloo; Atul Kumar; Laura Heitsch; June He; Ling Chen; Agnieszka Slowik; Daniel Strbian; Jin-Moo Lee Journal: Stroke Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Rajat Dhar; Ali Hamzehloo; Atul Kumar; Yasheng Chen; June He; Laura Heitsch; Agnieszka Slowik; Daniel Strbian; Jin-Moo Lee Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 6.200