Literature DB >> 22323741

Triggering a cell shape change by exploiting preexisting actomyosin contractions.

Minna Roh-Johnson1, Gidi Shemer, Christopher D Higgins, Joseph H McClellan, Adam D Werts, U Serdar Tulu, Liang Gao, Eric Betzig, Daniel P Kiehart, Bob Goldstein.   

Abstract

Apical constriction changes cell shapes, driving critical morphogenetic events, including gastrulation in diverse organisms and neural tube closure in vertebrates. Apical constriction is thought to be triggered by contraction of apical actomyosin networks. We found that apical actomyosin contractions began before cell shape changes in both Caenorhabitis elegans and Drosophila. In C. elegans, actomyosin networks were initially dynamic, contracting and generating cortical tension without substantial shrinking of apical surfaces. Apical cell-cell contact zones and actomyosin only later moved increasingly in concert, with no detectable change in actomyosin dynamics or cortical tension. Thus, apical constriction appears to be triggered not by a change in cortical tension, but by dynamic linking of apical cell-cell contact zones to an already contractile apical cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22323741      PMCID: PMC3298882          DOI: 10.1126/science.1217869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  29 in total

1.  Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo.

Authors:  S W Grill; P Gönczy; E H Stelzer; A A Hyman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells.

Authors:  B Fabry; G N Maksym; J P Butler; M Glogauer; D Navajas; J J Fredberg
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-09-13       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Mechanisms of cell positioning during C. elegans gastrulation.

Authors:  Jen-Yi Lee; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Forces for morphogenesis investigated with laser microsurgery and quantitative modeling.

Authors:  M Shane Hutson; Yoichiro Tokutake; Ming-Shien Chang; James W Bloor; Stephanos Venakides; Daniel P Kiehart; Glenn S Edwards
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo.

Authors:  Edwin Munro; Jeremy Nance; James R Priess
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Optical rheology of biological cells.

Authors:  Falk Wottawah; Stefan Schinkinger; Bryan Lincoln; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Maren Romeyke; Jochen Guck; Josef Käs
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 7.  Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth.

Authors:  T Mitchison; M Kirschner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The mechanical basis of morphogenesis. I. Epithelial folding and invagination.

Authors:  G M Odell; G Oster; P Alberch; B Burnside
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1981-07-30       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Cell polarity and gastrulation in C. elegans.

Authors:  Jeremy Nance; James R Priess
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila.

Authors:  D P Kiehart; C G Galbraith; K A Edwards; W L Rickoll; R A Montague
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04-17       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  119 in total

1.  Crumbs is an essential regulator of cytoskeletal dynamics and cell-cell adhesion during dorsal closure in Drosophila.

Authors:  David Flores-Benitez; Elisabeth Knust
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Modular activation of Rho1 by GPCR signalling imparts polarized myosin II activation during morphogenesis.

Authors:  Stephen Kerridge; Akankshi Munjal; Jean-Marc Philippe; Ankita Jha; Alain Garcia de las Bayonas; Andrew J Saurin; Thomas Lecuit
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Cell-type-specific mechanical response and myosin dynamics during retinal lens development in Drosophila.

Authors:  Laura Blackie; Rhian F Walther; Michael F Staddon; Shiladitya Banerjee; Franck Pichaud
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Epithelial morphogenesis: the mouse eye as a model system.

Authors:  Bharesh Chauhan; Timothy Plageman; Ming Lou; Richard Lang
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Development of FRET biosensors for mammalian and plant systems.

Authors:  Danny Hamers; Laura van Voorst Vader; Jan Willem Borst; Joachim Goedhart
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 6.  Adaptive viscoelasticity of epithelial cell junctions: from models to methods.

Authors:  Kate E Cavanaugh; Michael F Staddon; Shiladitya Banerjee; Margaret L Gardel
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 7.  E-cadherin junctions as active mechanical integrators in tissue dynamics.

Authors:  Thomas Lecuit; Alpha S Yap
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Mitotic cell rounding and epithelial thinning regulate lumen growth and shape.

Authors:  Esteban Hoijman; Davide Rubbini; Julien Colombelli; Berta Alsina
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Active contractility at E-cadherin junctions and its implications for cell extrusion in cancer.

Authors:  Selwin K Wu; Anne K Lagendijk; Benjamin M Hogan; Guillermo A Gomez; Alpha S Yap
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 10.  The role of vertebrate nonmuscle Myosin II in development and human disease.

Authors:  Xuefei Ma; Robert S Adelstein
Journal:  Bioarchitecture       Date:  2014-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.