Literature DB >> 22323678

Porous metal revision shells for management of contained acetabular bone defects at a mean follow-up of six years: a comparison between up to 50% bleeding host bone contact and more than 50% contact.

A Sternheim1, D Backstein, P R T Kuzyk, G Goshua, Y Berkovich, O Safir, A E Gross.   

Abstract

We report the use of porous metal acetabular revision shells in the treatment of contained bone loss. The outcomes of 53 patients with ≤ 50% acetabular bleeding host bone contact were compared with a control group of 49 patients with > 50% to 85% bleeding host bone contact. All patients were treated with the same type of trabecular metal acetabular revision shell. The mean age at revision was 62.4 years (42 to 80) and the mean follow-up of both groups was 72.4 months (60 to 102). Clinical, radiological and functional outcomes were assessed. There were four (7.5%) mechanical failures in the ≤ 50% host bone contact group and no failures in the > 50% host bone contact group (p = 0.068). Out of both groups combined there were four infections (3.9%) and five recurrent dislocations (4.9%) with a stable acetabular component construct that were revised to a constrained liner. Given the complexity of the reconstructive challenge, porous metal revision acetabular shells show acceptable failure rates at five to ten years' follow-up in the setting of significant contained bone defects. This favourable outcome might be due to the improved initial stability achieved by a high coefficient of friction between the acetabular implant and the host bone, and the high porosity, which affords good bone ingrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22323678     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  15 in total

1.  Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

Authors:  William J Long; Nicolas O Noiseux; Tad M Mabry; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Smoking may be a harbinger of early failure with ultraporous metal acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Keith R Berend; Joanne B Adams; Ryan C Jefferson; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.

Authors:  Tomas Amenabar; Wael A Rahman; Bandar M Hetaimish; Paul R Kuzyk; Oleg A Safir; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does cup-cage reconstruction with oversized cups provide initial stability in THA for osteoporotic acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Lucian B Solomon; Patrick Studer; John M Abrahams; Stuart A Callary; Caroline R Moran; Roumen B Stamenkov; Donald W Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Inari Laaksonen; Michelle Lorimer; Kirill Gromov; Ola Rolfson; Keijo T Mäkelä; Stephen E Graves; Henrik Malchau; Maziar Mohaddes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

9.  Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.

Authors:  Andrej Moličnik; Marko Hanc; Gregor Rečnik; Zmago Krajnc; Mitja Rupreht; Samo K Fokter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-16

10.  Short-term survival of the trabecular metal cup is similar to that of standard cups used in acetabular revision surgery.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Ola Rolfson; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.