Literature DB >> 22323345

Bioelectrical impedance with different equations versus deuterium oxide dilution method for the inference of body composition in healthy older persons.

K Pfrimer1, J C Moriguti, N K C Lima, J S Marchini, E Ferriolli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the accuracy of bioimpedance for the determination of body composition in older persons.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the assessment of lean body mass of healthy older volunteers obtained by the deuterium dilution method (reference) with those obtained by two frequently used bioelectrical impedance formulas and one formula specifically developed for a Latin-American population.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty one volunteers were studied, 12 women, with mean age 72±6.7 years.
SETTING: Urban community, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. MEASUREMENT: Fat free mass was determined, simultaneously, by the deuterium dilution method and bioelectrical impedance; results were compared. In bioelectrical impedance, body composition was calculated by the formulas of Deuremberg, Lukaski and Bolonchuck and Valencia et al.
RESULTS: Lean body mass of the studied volunteers, as determined by bioelectrical impedance was 37.8±9.2 kg by the application of the Lukaski e Bolonchuk formula, 37.4±9.3 kg (Deuremberg) and 43.2±8.9 kg (Valencia et. al.). The results were significantly correlated to those obtained by the deuterium dilution method (41.6±9.3 Kg), with r=0.963, 0.932 and 0.971, respectively. Lean body mass obtained by the Valencia formula was the most accurate.
CONCLUSION: In this study, lean body mass of older persons obtained by the bioelectrical impedance method showed good correlation with the values obtained by the deuterium dilution method. The formula of Valencia et al., developed for a Latin-American population, showed the best accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22323345     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-011-0137-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of bioelectrical impedance prediction equations for fat-free mass in a population-based sample of 75 y olds: the NORA study.

Authors:  Debashish Kumar Dey; Ingvar Bosaeus
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 2.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods.

Authors:  Ursula G Kyle; Ingvar Bosaeus; Antonio D De Lorenzo; Paul Deurenberg; Marinos Elia; José Manuel Gómez; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Luisa Kent-Smith; Jean-Claude Melchior; Matthias Pirlich; Hermann Scharfetter; Annemie M W J Schols; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.

Authors:  Rebecca Thomson; Grant D Brinkworth; Jonathan D Buckley; Manny Noakes; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Development and validation of two equations estimating body composition for overweight and obese postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Spyridon Kanellakis; Georgia Kourlaba; George Moschonis; Anastasia Vandorou; Yannis Manios
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  New equations for estimating body cell mass from bioimpedance parallel models in healthy older Germans.

Authors:  M Dittmar; H Reber
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Bioelectrical impedance measurements in patients with gastrointestinal disease: validation of the spectrum approach and a comparison of different methods for screening for nutritional depletion.

Authors:  Petronella L M Cox-Reijven; Bernard van Kreel; Peter B Soeters
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Effect of obesity on bioelectrical impedance.

Authors:  D S Gray; G A Bray; N Gemayel; K Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Estimation of body composition from bioelectric impedance of body segments.

Authors:  R N Baumgartner; W C Chumlea; A F Roche
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Body composition by hydrometry (deuterium oxide dilution) and bioelectrical impedance in subjects aged >60 y from rural regions of Cuba, Chile and Mexico.

Authors:  M E Valencia; H Alemán-Mateo; G Salazar; M Hernández Triana
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2003-07

10.  Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition.

Authors:  H C Lukaski; W W Bolonchuk; C B Hall; W A Siders
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1986-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of body composition analysis methods among centenary women: Seeking simpler methods.

Authors:  Mariana Gf Duarte; Paulo O Duarte; Anderson Pelichek; Eduardo Ferriolli; Julio C Moriguti; Karina Pfrimer; Nereida Kc Lima
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-07-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.