Literature DB >> 14668272

Bioelectrical impedance measurements in patients with gastrointestinal disease: validation of the spectrum approach and a comparison of different methods for screening for nutritional depletion.

Petronella L M Cox-Reijven1, Bernard van Kreel, Peter B Soeters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) may be of value in identifying patients with nutritional depletion.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of the study was to assess the validity of BIS in patients with gastrointestinal disease. The secondary aim was to compare different screening methods for identifying nutritionally depleted patients.
DESIGN: In 70 patients with gastrointestinal disease, BIS measurements were performed and fluid compartments were calculated from extrapolated resistance (R) values of extracellular (R(ECW)) and intracellular (R(ICW)) water based on mixture equations. Results were compared with total body water and ECW, which were measured by dilution methods. Patients were classified as depleted if their actual fat-free mass (FFM) was <90% of their ideal FFM (iFFM). Different screening approaches for depletion were compared: the impedance vector method and the resistance index (RI) in relation to iFFM (RI/iFFM).
RESULTS: Total body water and ICW were largely underestimated (4 L) in the not-depleted patients but not in the depleted patients. In both groups, ECW was slightly overestimated (0.6-0.7 L). The critical frequency was 60% higher and the membrane capacitance was 40% lower in the depleted than in the not-depleted patients. The impedance vector method failed to identify depleted patients, whereas the proposed ratio at R(50) (R measured at 50 kHz) and R(inf) (R at infinite frequency) resulted in comparable sensitivity (86%) and specificity (73-80%).
CONCLUSIONS: BIS measures of body fluids are influenced by the presence of depletion, probably because of alterations in the electric properties of the body at the cellular level. However, for screening purposes, the use of the ratio (L(2)/R)/iFFM at R(50) and R(inf) may be of value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14668272     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/78.6.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  11 in total

Review 1.  Current management of enterocutaneous fistula.

Authors:  Amy R Evenson; Josef E Fischer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Electrical bioimpedance and other techniques for gastric emptying and motility evaluation.

Authors:  María Raquel Huerta-Franco; Miguel Vargas-Luna; Juana Berenice Montes-Frausto; Corina Flores-Hernández; Ismael Morales-Mata
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-02-15

3.  [Treatment of enteric fistula in open abdomen].

Authors:  R A Evenson; J E Fischer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Bioelectrical impedance with different equations versus deuterium oxide dilution method for the inference of body composition in healthy older persons.

Authors:  K Pfrimer; J C Moriguti; N K C Lima; J S Marchini; E Ferriolli
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Rapid measurement of total body water to facilitate clinical decision making in hospitalized elderly patients.

Authors:  James S Powers; Leena Choi; Rhonda Bitting; Nitin Gupta; Maciej Buchowski
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Relation of Disease with Standardized Phase Angle among Older Patients.

Authors:  C E Graf; F R Herrmann; L Genton
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Association of Drug Application and Hydration Status in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Laura Hoen; Daniel Pfeffer; Rico Zapf; Andrea Raabe; Janosch Hildebrand; Johannes Kraft; Stefan Kalkhof
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in clinical practice: implications for prognosis in stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Pankaj G Vashi; Jessica King; Sadie L Dahlk; James F Grutsch; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Bioelectrical impedance phase angle as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer.

Authors:  Digant Gupta; Carolyn A Lammersfeld; Pankaj G Vashi; Jessica King; Sadie L Dahlk; James F Grutsch; Christopher G Lis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  The theory and fundamentals of bioimpedance analysis in clinical status monitoring and diagnosis of diseases.

Authors:  Sami F Khalil; Mas S Mohktar; Fatimah Ibrahim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.