Literature DB >> 22322904

Supraspinatus tendon tears at 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography: diagnosis with 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus 2D conventional sequences.

Joon-Yong Jung1, Won-Hee Jee, Michael Y Park, So-Yeon Lee, Yang-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of shoulder MR arthrography with 3D isotropic fat-suppressed (FS) turbo spin-echo sequence (TSE-SPACE) for supraspinatus tendon tears in comparison with 2D conventional sequences at 3.0 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was HIPAA-compliant and approved by the institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent. Eighty-seven arthroscopically confirmed patients who underwent 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography with 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE were included in a consecutive fashion from March 2009 to February 2010. Two reviewers independently analyzed 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement (κ) were compared between 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE for full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears together and for partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears alone.
RESULTS: There were 33 full-thickness tears and 28 partial-thickness tears of supraspinatus tendons. For full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears together, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both readers were 96, 92, and 94% on 2D sequences and 91, 84, and 89% on 3D TSE-SPACE. For partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears alone, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 95, 92, and 94% on 2D sequences and 84, 85, and 84% on 3D TSE-SPACE. There was no statistical difference between 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE. Interobserver agreements were almost perfect on 2D conventional sequences and substantial on 3D TSE-SPACE.
CONCLUSION: Compared with 2D conventional sequences, MR arthrography using 3D TSE-SPACE was comparable for diagnosing supraspinatus tendon tears despite limitations in detecting small partial-thickness tears and in discriminating between full-thickness and deep partial-thickness tears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22322904     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-012-1361-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  29 in total

1.  Horizontal component of partial-thickness tears of rotator cuff: imaging characteristics and comparison of ABER view with oblique coronal view at MR arthrography initial results.

Authors:  Sang Yong Lee; Joong K Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Thomas Magee; David Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Rim-rent tear of the rotator cuff: a common and easily overlooked partial tear.

Authors:  Emily N Vinson; Clyde A Helms; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Can isotropic fast gradient echo imaging be substituted for conventional T1 weighted sequences in shoulder MR arthrography at 3 Tesla?

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dae Kun Oh; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon; Sang-Hee Choi; Jee Young Jung; Sooho Bae; Jaechul Yoo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  B Flannigan; S Kursunoglu-Brahme; S Snyder; R Karzel; W Del Pizzo; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MR arthrographic depiction of tears of the rotator cuff: benefit of abduction and external rotation of the arm.

Authors:  P F Tirman; F W Bost; L S Steinbach; J C Mall; C G Peterfy; T G Sampson; W E Sheehan; J R Forbes; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography.

Authors:  W E Palmer; J H Brown; D I Rosenthal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  3-T MRI of the shoulder: is MR arthrography necessary?

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of rotator cuff tears using 3-Tesla MRI versus 3-Tesla MRA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ciaran McGarvey; Ziad Harb; Christian Smith; Russell Houghton; Steven Corbett; Adil Ajuied
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Diagnostic performance of wrist magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography: comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1 weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography and two-dimensional MR arthrography.

Authors:  Eunsun Oh; Young C Yoon; Min J Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of oblique coronal images in knee of three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted turbo spin echo MRI versus two-dimensional fast spin echo T2-weighted sequences for evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Hee J Park; So Y Lee; Seon H Choi; Jin H Ahn; Se J Park; Jai H Park; Eugene Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of two-dimensional fast spin echo T2 weighted sequences and three-dimensional volume isotropic T2 weighted fast spin echo (VISTA) MRI in the evaluation of triangular fibrocartilage of the wrist.

Authors:  Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Kyung A Kang; Eun Young Kim; Hun Kyu Shin; Se Jin Park; Jai Hyung Park; Eugene Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Diagnostic performance of shoulder magnetic resonance arthrography for labral tears having surgery as reference: comparison of high-resolution isotropic 3D sequence (THRIVE) with standard protocol.

Authors:  Sun Hwa Lee; Seong Jong Yun; Youngno Yoon
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Evaluation of shoulder pathology: three-dimensional enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation MR vs two-dimensional fast spin echo T2 fat saturation MR.

Authors:  H J Park; S Y Lee; M S Kim; S H Choi; E C Chung; S H Kook; E Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Evaluation of Diagnostic Precision of Ultrasound for Rotator Cuff Disorders in Patients with Shoulder Pain.

Authors:  Behzad Aminzadeh; Samane Najafi; Ali Moradi; Bita Abbasi; Donya Farrokh; Maryam Emadzadeh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-11

8.  Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic and two-dimensional conventional indirect MR arthrography for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Young Cheol Yoon; Sukkyung Jee; Jong Won Kwon; Jang Gyu Cha; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Is the Grafted Tendon Shifted Anteriorly in the Femoral Tunnel at the Postremodeling Phase After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Clinical MRI Study.

Authors:  Jun Onodera; Kazunori Yasuda; Tetsuro Masuda; Yoshie Tanabe; Nobuto Kitamura; Tomonori Yagi; Eiji Kondo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-06-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.