OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of shoulder MR arthrography with 3D isotropic fat-suppressed (FS) turbo spin-echo sequence (TSE-SPACE) for supraspinatus tendon tears in comparison with 2D conventional sequences at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was HIPAA-compliant and approved by the institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent. Eighty-seven arthroscopically confirmed patients who underwent 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography with 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE were included in a consecutive fashion from March 2009 to February 2010. Two reviewers independently analyzed 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement (κ) were compared between 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE for full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears together and for partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears alone. RESULTS: There were 33 full-thickness tears and 28 partial-thickness tears of supraspinatus tendons. For full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears together, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both readers were 96, 92, and 94% on 2D sequences and 91, 84, and 89% on 3D TSE-SPACE. For partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears alone, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 95, 92, and 94% on 2D sequences and 84, 85, and 84% on 3D TSE-SPACE. There was no statistical difference between 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE. Interobserver agreements were almost perfect on 2D conventional sequences and substantial on 3D TSE-SPACE. CONCLUSION: Compared with 2D conventional sequences, MR arthrography using 3D TSE-SPACE was comparable for diagnosing supraspinatus tendon tears despite limitations in detecting small partial-thickness tears and in discriminating between full-thickness and deep partial-thickness tears.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of shoulder MR arthrography with 3D isotropic fat-suppressed (FS) turbo spin-echo sequence (TSE-SPACE) for supraspinatus tendon tears in comparison with 2D conventional sequences at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was HIPAA-compliant and approved by the institutional review board with a waiver of informed consent. Eighty-seven arthroscopically confirmed patients who underwent 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography with 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE were included in a consecutive fashion from March 2009 to February 2010. Two reviewers independently analyzed 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver agreement (κ) were compared between 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE for full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears together and for partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears alone. RESULTS: There were 33 full-thickness tears and 28 partial-thickness tears of supraspinatus tendons. For full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears together, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both readers were 96, 92, and 94% on 2D sequences and 91, 84, and 89% on 3D TSE-SPACE. For partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears alone, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 95, 92, and 94% on 2D sequences and 84, 85, and 84% on 3D TSE-SPACE. There was no statistical difference between 2D sequences and 3D TSE-SPACE. Interobserver agreements were almost perfect on 2D conventional sequences and substantial on 3D TSE-SPACE. CONCLUSION: Compared with 2D conventional sequences, MR arthrography using 3D TSE-SPACE was comparable for diagnosing supraspinatus tendon tears despite limitations in detecting small partial-thickness tears and in discriminating between full-thickness and deep partial-thickness tears.
Authors: Dae Kun Oh; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon; Sang-Hee Choi; Jee Young Jung; Sooho Bae; Jaechul Yoo Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: P F Tirman; F W Bost; L S Steinbach; J C Mall; C G Peterfy; T G Sampson; W E Sheehan; J R Forbes; H K Genant Journal: Radiology Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2003-09-26 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Kyung A Kang; Eun Young Kim; Hun Kyu Shin; Se Jin Park; Jai Hyung Park; Eugene Kim Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Ji Hyun Lee; Young Cheol Yoon; Sukkyung Jee; Jong Won Kwon; Jang Gyu Cha; Jae Chul Yoo Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 13.800