Literature DB >> 22321132

The economic benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in community-based wound care in the NHS.

Caroline Dowsett1, Lynn Davis, Valerie Henderson, Richard Searle.   

Abstract

The human and economic costs of wounds are of major concern within today's National Health Service. Advances in wound care technology have been shown to be beneficial both in healing and in relation to patient quality of life. Negative pressure has often been associated with high-cost care and restricted to use in the secondary care setting. There is growing use of negative pressure within the community, and this has the potential to benefit the patient and the service by providing quality care in the patient's home setting. Three community sites were chosen to monitor their use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over a period of 2 years, and this paper presents some of the key findings of this work. The data generated has been used to help target resources and prevent misuse of therapy. Cost per patient episode has been calculated, and this can be compared to similar costs in secondary care, showing significant savings if patients are discharged earlier from secondary care. There is also an increased demand for more patients with complex wounds to be cared for in the community, and in the future, it is likely that community initiated NPWT may become more common. Early analysis of the data showed that the average cost of dressing complex wounds would be significantly less than using traditional dressings, where increased nursing visits could increase costs. There is a compelling argument for more negative pressure to be used and initiated in the community, based not only on improved quality of life for patients but also on the economic benefits of the therapy.
© 2012 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321132      PMCID: PMC7950552          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00913.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  9 in total

1.  State-of-the-art treatment of chronic leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial comparing vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) with modern wound dressings.

Authors:  Jeroen D D Vuerstaek; Tryfon Vainas; Jan Wuite; Patty Nelemans; Martino H A Neumann; Joep C J M Veraart
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  The resource costs of wound care in Bradford and Airedale primary care trust in the UK.

Authors:  K Vowden; P Vowden; J Posnett
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Lawrence A Lavery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effectiveness of negative pressure closure in the integration of split thickness skin grafts: a randomized, double-masked, controlled trial.

Authors:  Sergio Llanos; Stefan Danilla; Cristina Barraza; Eugenia Armijo; Jose L Piñeros; Maria Quintas; Susana Searle; Wilfredo Calderon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Clinical efficacy of a new variant of a foam-based NWPT system.

Authors:  S Bondokji; M Rangaswamy; C Reuter; Y Farajalla; T Mole; J Cockwill; J Smith
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK.

Authors:  Gerry Bennett; Carol Dealey; John Posnett
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Comparison of negative pressure wound therapy using vacuum-assisted closure with advanced moist wound therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter A Blume; Jodi Walters; Wyatt Payne; Jose Ayala; John Lantis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The cost of wound care for a local population in England.

Authors:  Philip Drew; John Posnett; Louise Rusling
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Wyatt G Payne; John Posnett; Oscar Alvarez; Marie Brown-Etris; Gayle Jameson; Randall Wolcott; Hussein Dharma; Samantha Hartwell; Diane Ochs
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.629

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Negative Pressure, a "Solution" in the Treatment of Infected Knee Prosthesis?

Authors:  Razvan Ene; Zsombor Panti; Emanuel Albu; Patricia Ene; Monica Mihaela Cirstoiu; Florin Catalin Cirstoiu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Improved wound management at lower cost: a sensible goal for Australia.

Authors:  Rosana E Norman; Michelle Gibb; Anthony Dyer; Jennifer Prentice; Stephen Yelland; Qinglu Cheng; Peter A Lazzarini; Keryln Carville; Karen Innes-Walker; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards; Edward Burn; Nicholas Graves
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Topical Negative Pressure Device in Promoting Healing in Chronic Wounds.

Authors:  Sarah Bradbury; Neal Walkley; Nicola Ivins; Keith Harding
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Vitamin E and wound healing: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Rachel Hobson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Recent accomplishments in wound healing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mudge
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Management of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Alexandra M Keane; Matt Keller; Margaret A Olsen; Erika D Sears; Alison K Snyder-Warwick
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers Using Mechanically Versus Electrically Powered Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  William A Marston; David G Armstrong; Alexander M Reyzelman; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Validation of a Manual Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PragmaVAC) for Acute and Chronic Wounds: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mahmoud Hariri; Bakry Maaz; Measser Netfagi; Jude Alawa; Ahmad Sattouf; Hussam Alden Dubies; Jehad Alahmad; Muhammet Fuat Seyitisa; Amandine Godier-Furnemont; Abedalkarem Ghali; Ahmad Ghandour; Zohair Abdullah; Munther Alsaleh; Ibrahim Almousa; Waiel Habib; Hisham Alshaer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of High-Grade Ventral Hernia Repairs.

Authors:  Nelson Rodriguez-Unda; Kevin C Soares; Saïd C Azoury; Pablo A Baltodano; Caitlin W Hicks; Karen K Burce; Peter Cornell; Carisa M Cooney; Frederic E Eckhauser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Negative pressure wound therapy literature review of efficacy, cost effectiveness, and impact on patients' quality of life in chronic wound management and its implementation in the United kingdom.

Authors:  Diaa Othman
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2012-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.