Literature DB >> 22320800

Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.

Adam M Zysk1, Jovan G Brankov, Miles N Wernick, Mark A Anastasio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since the introduction of clinical x-ray phase-contrast mammography (PCM), a technique that exploits refractive-index variations to create edge enhancement at tissue boundaries, a number of optimization studies employing physical image-quality metrics have been performed. Ideally, task-based assessment of PCM would have been conducted with human readers. These studies have been limited, however, in part due to the large parameter-space of PCM system configurations and the difficulty of employing expert readers for large-scale studies. It has been proposed that numerical observers can be used to approximate the statistical performance of human readers, thus enabling the study of task-based performance over a large parameter-space.
METHODS: Methods are presented for task-based image quality assessment of PCM images with a numerical observer, the most significant of which is an adapted lumpy background from the conventional mammography literature that accounts for the unique wavefield propagation physics of PCM image formation and will be used with a numerical observer to assess image quality. These methods are demonstrated by performing a PCM task-based image quality study using a numerical observer. This study employs a signal-known-exactly, background-known-statistically Bayesian ideal observer method to assess the detectability of a calcification object in PCM images when the anode spot size and calcification diameter are varied.
RESULTS: The first realistic model for the structured background in PCM images has been introduced. A numerical study demonstrating the use of this background model has compared PCM and conventional mammography detection of calcification objects. The study data confirm the strong PCM calcification detectability dependence on anode spot size. These data can be used to balance the trade-off between enhanced image quality and the potential for motion artifacts that comes with use of a reduced spot size and increased exposure time.
CONCLUSIONS: A method has been presented for the incorporation of structured breast background data into task-based numerical observer assessment of PCM images. The method adapts conventional background simulation techniques to the wavefield propagation physics necessary for PCM imaging. This method is demonstrated with a simple detection task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22320800      PMCID: PMC3277609          DOI: 10.1118/1.3676183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.

Authors:  F Arfelli; V Bonvicini; A Bravin; G Cantatore; E Castelli; L D Palma; M D Michiel; M Fabrizioli; R Longo; R H Menk; A Olivo; S Pani; D Pontoni; P Poropat; M Prest; A Rashevsky; M Ratti; L Rigon; G Tromba; A Vacchi; E Vallazza; F Zanconati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  X-ray scattering from human breast tissues and breast-equivalent materials.

Authors:  M E Poletti; D Gonçalves; I Mazzaro
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Computer aided detection of masses in mammography using subregion Hotelling observers.

Authors:  Alan H Baydush; David M Catarious; Craig K Abbey; Carey E Floyd
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The first trial of phase contrast imaging for digital full-field mammography using a practical molybdenum x-ray tube.

Authors:  Toyohiko Tanaka; Chika Honda; Satoru Matsuo; Kazuo Noma; Hiromu Oohara; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ota; Keiko Tsuchiya; Yoko Sakashita; Aya Yamada; Michio Yamasaki; Akira Furukawa; Masashi Takahashi; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Some simple rules for contrast, signal-to-noise and resolution in in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Timur E Gureyev; Yakov I Nesterets; Andrew W Stevenson; Peter R Miller; Andrew Pogany; Stephen W Wilkins
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Clinical implementation of x-ray phase-contrast imaging: theoretical foundations and design considerations.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Analysis of ideal observer signal detectability in phase-contrast imaging employing linear shift-invariant optical systems.

Authors:  Mark A Anastasio; Cheng-Ying Chou; Adam M Zysk; Jovan G Brankov
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The elemental composition of tumors: kerma data for neutrons.

Authors:  R L Maughan; P J Chuba; A T Porter; E Ben-Josef; D R Lucas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.

Authors:  Erik Fredenberg; Mats Danielsson; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Magnus Aslund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Large-angle x-ray scatter in Talbot-Lau interferometry for breast imaging.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford; Zhihua Liang; Mini Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.