Literature DB >> 21119750

Analysis of ideal observer signal detectability in phase-contrast imaging employing linear shift-invariant optical systems.

Mark A Anastasio1, Cheng-Ying Chou, Adam M Zysk, Jovan G Brankov.   

Abstract

Phase-contrast imaging methods exploit variations in an object's refractive index distribution to permit the visualization of subtle features that may have very similar optical absorption properties. Although phase-contrast is often viewed as being desirable in many biomedical applications, its relative influence on signal detectability when both absorption- and phase-contrast are present remains relatively unexplored. In this work, we investigate the ideal Bayesian observer signal-to-noise ratio in phase-contrast imaging for a signal-known-exactly/background-known exactly detection task involving a weak signal. We demonstrate that this signal detectability measure can be decomposed into three contributions that have distinct interpretations associated with the imaging physics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21119750      PMCID: PMC2997532          DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.27.002648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  19 in total

1.  Quantitative Phase Imaging Using Hard X Rays.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-09-30       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Short communication: anomalous image quality phantom scores in magnification mammography: evidence of phase contrast enhancement.

Authors:  C J Kotre; I P Birch; K J Robson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Multiple-image radiography.

Authors:  Miles N Wernick; Oliver Wirjadi; Dean Chapman; Zhong Zhong; Nikolas P Galatsanos; Yongyi Yang; Jovan G Brankov; Oral Oltulu; Mark A Anastasio; Carol Muehleman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy. III. The effects of noise.

Authors:  D Paganin; A Barty; P J McMahon; K A Nugent
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Medical phase contrast x-ray imaging: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  R A Lewis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Characterization of the phase-contrast radiography edge-enhancement effect in a cabinet x-ray system.

Authors:  Edwin F Donnelly; Kenneth G Lewis; Kristy M Wolske; David R Pickens; Ronald R Price
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The first trial of phase contrast imaging for digital full-field mammography using a practical molybdenum x-ray tube.

Authors:  Toyohiko Tanaka; Chika Honda; Satoru Matsuo; Kazuo Noma; Hiromu Oohara; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ota; Keiko Tsuchiya; Yoko Sakashita; Aya Yamada; Michio Yamasaki; Akira Furukawa; Masashi Takahashi; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  A new microscopic principle.

Authors:  D GABOR
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1948-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Some simple rules for contrast, signal-to-noise and resolution in in-line x-ray phase-contrast imaging.

Authors:  Timur E Gureyev; Yakov I Nesterets; Andrew W Stevenson; Peter R Miller; Andrew Pogany; Stephen W Wilkins
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Clinical implementation of x-ray phase-contrast imaging: theoretical foundations and design considerations.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Potential for imaging engineered tissues with X-ray phase contrast.

Authors:  Alyssa Appel; Mark A Anastasio; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Ideal-observer detectability in photon-counting differential phase-contrast imaging using a linear-systems approach.

Authors:  Erik Fredenberg; Mats Danielsson; J Webster Stayman; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Magnus Aslund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Adaptation of a clustered lumpy background model for task-based image quality assessment in x-ray phase-contrast mammography.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Jovan G Brankov; Miles N Wernick; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Learning stochastic object models from medical imaging measurements by use of advanced ambient generative adversarial networks.

Authors:  Weimin Zhou; Sayantan Bhadra; Frank J Brooks; Hua Li; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.

Authors:  Howard C Gifford; Zhihua Liang; Mini Das
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.