Literature DB >> 11225288

Clinical applications of acoustic rhinometry.

L F Grymer1.   

Abstract

The clinical value of acoustic rhinometry (AR) is its ability to measure the dimensions of the nasal cavity in terms of a curve describing the cross-sectional areas as a function of distance. This curve describes nasal airway patency and gives an impression of the degree of nasal obstruction. The method provides values before and after decongestion which allow to evaluate the cause of the nasal obstruction as mainly skeletal or mucosal. This makes AR a tool for diagnosis and follow-up of treatment in both rhinology and rhinosurgery. Similarly, AR is a reliable method to show the dimensional changes of the nasal cavity before and after a given treatment. In the evaluation of a surgical intervention it is reasonable to use decongested values. Turbinate surgery, septo- and rhinoplasty, orthognatic surgery and paranasal sinus surgery and their influence on the dimensions of the nasal cavity may be reflected by AR. The absolute minimum cross-sectional area, and cross-sectional areas and volumes at fixed distances are the recommended parameters to show dimensional changes after nasal surgery. The predictive value of AR, in relation to nasal obstruction, should have high specificity and sensitivity to be used in a clinical setting. It seems that the single variables do not provide enough information for the diagnosis of obstruction, and it has been stressed that the results should be interpreted together with rhinoscopy and subjective complaints. A statistical model based on questionnaire, rhinoscopic findings and several variables from AR has been proposed to increase the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11225288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinol Suppl        ISSN: 1013-0047


  8 in total

1.  The role of sensation in subjective and objective evaluation of nasal patency.

Authors:  S Dipak; N Prepageran; Siti Haslinda; As Atiya; R Raman
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-13

2.  Acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation test in perennial allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Tilman Keck; Kerstin Wiesmiller; Joerg Lindemann; Ajnacska Rozsasi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Effect of an intra-oral nasal dilation appliance on 3-D nasal airway morphology in adults.

Authors:  G Dave Singh; Mark Abramson
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Is nasal cavity geometry associated with body mass index, height and weight?

Authors:  Md Tanveer Raza; De-Yun Wang
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-09-04

5.  Nasal and lung function in competitive swimmers.

Authors:  C Ondolo; S Aversa; Fm Passali; C Ciacco; C Gulotta; M Lauriello; S Conticello
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Improvement in minimal cross-sectional area and nasal-cavity volume occurs in different areas after septoplasty and radiofrequency therapy of inferior turbinates.

Authors:  Ann Helen Nilsen; Wenche Moe Thorstensen; Anne-Sofie Helvik; Staale Nordgaard; Vegard Bugten
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  The normal ranges of selected acoustic rhinometry parameters depending on age and sex-component of standarization in nasal provocation test.

Authors:  Edyta Krzych-Fałta; Paulina Szczęsnowicz-Dąbrowska; Bolesław Samoliński; Antoni Grzanka; Oksana Wojas
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 8.  Acoustic rhinometry in mouth breathing patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Cardoso de Melo; Adriana de Oliveira de Camargo Gomes; Arlene Santos Cavalcanti; Hilton Justino da Silva
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.