Traci Jarrett1, John Blosnich, Cindy Tworek, Kimberly Horn. 1. Translational Tobacco Reduction Research Program, WV Prevention Research Center and Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Department of Community Medicine, West Virginia University, 1 Medical Center Drive, PO Box 9190, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. tjarrett@hsc.wvu.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Hookah use is a growing tobacco trend among young adults; yet little is known about how young adult college student hookah smokers differ from nonsmokers or cigarette smokers. METHODS: Results from 18- to 24-year-old participants in the Fall 2008-Spring 2009 National College Health Assessment II (N = 82,155) were used in multinomial logistic regression models to compare nonsmokers, cigarette-only smokers, hookah-only smokers, and dual (cigarette and hookah) users. RESULTS: Ten percent of the sample reported hookah use in the last 30 days. Compared with nonsmokers, cigarette, hookah, and dual users were more likely to be younger, male, White, and use other substances (including alcohol). Compared with nonsmokers, hookah and dual users were more likely to be members of fraternities/sororities (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17 and 1.14, respectively), live in the West (OR = 1.49 and 1.31, respectively), and attend larger institutions. Compared with cigarette-only smokers, hookah and dual users were more likely to be younger, male, live on campus, live in the West, attend large institutions, and were less likely to attend public institutions. Compared with cigarette-only smokers, hookah-only users were more likely to be non-White and less likely to use marijuana or other drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Hookah-only and dual users are demographically different than cigarette-only or nonsmoking college students. Interventions for tobacco use on college campuses should address the demographic differences among tobacco users (including polysubstance use) and attempt to recruit students as entering freshman to provide education and prevent hookah use uptake.
INTRODUCTION:Tobacco use is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Hookah use is a growing tobacco trend among young adults; yet little is known about how young adult college student hookah smokers differ from nonsmokers or cigarette smokers. METHODS: Results from 18- to 24-year-old participants in the Fall 2008-Spring 2009 National College Health Assessment II (N = 82,155) were used in multinomial logistic regression models to compare nonsmokers, cigarette-only smokers, hookah-only smokers, and dual (cigarette and hookah) users. RESULTS: Ten percent of the sample reported hookah use in the last 30 days. Compared with nonsmokers, cigarette, hookah, and dual users were more likely to be younger, male, White, and use other substances (including alcohol). Compared with nonsmokers, hookah and dual users were more likely to be members of fraternities/sororities (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17 and 1.14, respectively), live in the West (OR = 1.49 and 1.31, respectively), and attend larger institutions. Compared with cigarette-only smokers, hookah and dual users were more likely to be younger, male, live on campus, live in the West, attend large institutions, and were less likely to attend public institutions. Compared with cigarette-only smokers, hookah-only users were more likely to be non-White and less likely to use marijuana or other drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Hookah-only and dual users are demographically different than cigarette-only or nonsmoking college students. Interventions for tobacco use on college campuses should address the demographic differences among tobacco users (including polysubstance use) and attempt to recruit students as entering freshman to provide education and prevent hookah use uptake.
Authors: Susanne B Montgomery; Maria De Borba-Silva; Pramil Singh; Hildemar Dos Santos; Jayakaran S Job; T L Brink Journal: Calif J Health Promot Date: 2015
Authors: Eva Sharma; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Kathryn C Edwards; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Hoda T Hammad; Gabriella Anic; Jean Limpert; Lisa D Gardner; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Carla J Berg; Regine Haardörfer; Michael Lewis; Betelihem Getachew; Steven A Lloyd; Sarah Fretti Thomas; Angela Lanier; Kelleigh Trepanier; Teresa Johnston; Linda Grimsley; Bruce Foster; Stephanie Benson; Alicia Smith; Dana Boyd Barr; Michael Windle Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2016-05
Authors: Jaime E Sidani; Ariel Shensa; Tracey E Barnett; Robert L Cook; Brian A Primack Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Paul T Harrell; Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi; Andrew D Plunk; Ming Ji; Silvia S Martins Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.829