Tracey E Barnett1, Felix E Lorenzo2, Eric K Soule3. 1. a Epidemiology, University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , USA. 2. b Social & Behavioral Sciences Program , University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , USA. 3. c Department of Psychology , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the dangers associated with hookah tobacco smoking, use and popularity in the United States among young adults continue to increase. While quantitative studies have assessed users' attitudes toward hookah, qualitative research can provide a more in-depth description of positive and negative attitudes and beliefs associated with hookah use. OBJECTIVES: To determine outcome expectancies associated with hookah use among young adults. METHODS: We conducted six focus groups in 2013 to identify outcome expectancies associated with hookah use. Participants (N = 40) were young adults aged 18-23 who reported hookah use in the past three months. Using Outcome Expectancy Theory perspective, we posed the question "Hookah smoking is _______?" to elicit words or phrases that users associate with hookah use. RESULTS: Over 75% of the users' hookah use outcome expectancies were positive, including associating hookah smoking with relaxation and a social experience. Content analysis of the words engendered six themes. These themes included Social Appeal, Physical Attractiveness, Pleasant Smoke, Comparison to Cigarettes, Relaxation, and Deterrents. Fewer negative hookah use expectancy words and phrases were identified, but included "tar" and "cough." CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that participants lacked basic knowledge about hookah tobacco smoking, had misconceptions about its danger, and had many positive associations with hookah use. Incorporating components addressing positive hookah expectancies may improve the efficacy of established and new hookah use prevention and cessation interventions and policies.
BACKGROUND: Despite the dangers associated with hookah tobacco smoking, use and popularity in the United States among young adults continue to increase. While quantitative studies have assessed users' attitudes toward hookah, qualitative research can provide a more in-depth description of positive and negative attitudes and beliefs associated with hookah use. OBJECTIVES: To determine outcome expectancies associated with hookah use among young adults. METHODS: We conducted six focus groups in 2013 to identify outcome expectancies associated with hookah use. Participants (N = 40) were young adults aged 18-23 who reported hookah use in the past three months. Using Outcome Expectancy Theory perspective, we posed the question "Hookah smoking is _______?" to elicit words or phrases that users associate with hookah use. RESULTS: Over 75% of the users' hookah use outcome expectancies were positive, including associating hookah smoking with relaxation and a social experience. Content analysis of the words engendered six themes. These themes included Social Appeal, Physical Attractiveness, Pleasant Smoke, Comparison to Cigarettes, Relaxation, and Deterrents. Fewer negative hookah use expectancy words and phrases were identified, but included "tar" and "cough." CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that participants lacked basic knowledge about hookah tobacco smoking, had misconceptions about its danger, and had many positive associations with hookah use. Incorporating components addressing positive hookah expectancies may improve the efficacy of established and new hookah use prevention and cessation interventions and policies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hookah; Outcome Expectancy Theory; qualitative research; young adult
Authors: Renee D Goodwin; Alice Grinberg; Jack Shapiro; Diana Keith; Michael P McNeil; Farah Taha; Bianca Jiang; Carl L Hart Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: René A Arrazola; Tushar Singh; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; Benjamin J Apelberg; Rebecca E Bunnell; Conrad J Choiniere; Brian A King; Shanna Cox; Tim McAfee; Ralph S Caraballo Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Eva Sharma; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Kathryn C Edwards; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Hoda T Hammad; Gabriella Anic; Jean Limpert; Lisa D Gardner; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan; Raed Bahelah; Zoran Bursac; Ziyad Ben Taleb; Joseph R DiFranza; Malak Tleis; Rima Nakkash; Rime Jebai; Mohammad Masudul Alam; Miguel Ángel Cano; Matthew T Sutherland; Kristopher Fenni; Taghrid Asfar; Thomas Eissenberg; Kenneth D Ward; Wasim Maziak Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joshua O Barker; Dannielle E Kelley; Seth M Noar; Beth A Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Azieb W Kidanu; Rui Shi; Raul Cruz-Cano; Robert H Feldman; James Butler; Typhanye V Dyer; Craig S Fryer; Amitabh Varshney; Eric Lee; Pamela I Clark Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-08-06 Impact factor: 5.825