BACKGROUND: Mouse lines are being selectively bred in replicate for high blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) achieved after a short period of ethanol (EtOH) drinking early in the circadian dark phase. High Drinking in the Dark-1 (HDID-1) mice were in selected generation S18, and the replicate HDID-2 line in generation S11. METHODS: To determine other traits genetically correlated with high DID, we compared naïve animals from both lines with the unselected, segregating progenitor stock, HS/Npt. Differences between HDID-1 and HS would imply commonality of genetic influences on DID and these traits. RESULTS: HDID-1 mice showed less basal activity, greater EtOH stimulated activity, and greater sensitivity to EtOH-induced foot slips than HS. They showed lesser sensitivity to acute EtOH hypothermia and longer duration loss of righting reflex than HS. HDID-1 and control HS lines did not differ in sensitivity on 2 measures of intoxication, the balance beam and the accelerating rotarod. None of the acute response results could be explained by differences in EtOH metabolism. HDID-2 differed from HS on some, but not all, of the above responses. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that some EtOH responses share common genetic control with reaching high BECs after DID, a finding consistent with other data regarding genetic contributions to EtOH responses.
BACKGROUND:Mouse lines are being selectively bred in replicate for high blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) achieved after a short period of ethanol (EtOH) drinking early in the circadian dark phase. High Drinking in the Dark-1 (HDID-1) mice were in selected generation S18, and the replicate HDID-2 line in generation S11. METHODS: To determine other traits genetically correlated with high DID, we compared naïve animals from both lines with the unselected, segregating progenitor stock, HS/Npt. Differences between HDID-1 and HS would imply commonality of genetic influences on DID and these traits. RESULTS:HDID-1mice showed less basal activity, greater EtOH stimulated activity, and greater sensitivity to EtOH-induced foot slips than HS. They showed lesser sensitivity to acute EtOH hypothermia and longer duration loss of righting reflex than HS. HDID-1 and control HS lines did not differ in sensitivity on 2 measures of intoxication, the balance beam and the accelerating rotarod. None of the acute response results could be explained by differences in EtOH metabolism. HDID-2 differed from HS on some, but not all, of the above responses. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that some EtOH responses share common genetic control with reaching high BECs after DID, a finding consistent with other data regarding genetic contributions to EtOH responses.
Authors: John C Crabbe; Alexandre M Colville; Lauren C Kruse; Andy J Cameron; Stephanie E Spence; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Pamela Metten Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Elizabeth Munn; Mark Bunning; Sofia Prada; Martin Bohlen; John C Crabbe; Douglas Wahlsten Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Chia-Hua Yu; Jason P Schlumbohm; Andy J Cameron; Douglas Wahlsten Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2003-04-18
Authors: Z A Rodd; R L Bell; D L McKinzie; A A Webster; J M Murphy; L Lumeng; T-K Li; W J McBride Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: R Renteria; Z M Jeanes; R A Mangieri; E Y Maier; D M Kircher; T R Buske; R A Morrisett Journal: Int Rev Neurobiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.230
Authors: Brandon M Fritz; Kristy A Cordero; Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Pamela Metten; John C Crabbe; Stephen L Boehm Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Angela R Ozburn; Pamela Metten; Sheena Potretzke; Kayla G Townsley; Yuri A Blednov; John C Crabbe Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: J C Crabbe; P Metten; J K Belknap; S E Spence; A J Cameron; J P Schlumbohm; L C Huang; A M Barkley-Levenson; M M Ford; T J Phillips Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Christopher L Cunningham; Phoebe J Smitasin; John C Crabbe Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 4.280