Literature DB >> 22316249

Ethanol sensitivity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

John C Crabbe1, Lauren C Kruse, Alexandre M Colville, Andy J Cameron, Stephanie E Spence, Jason P Schlumbohm, Lawrence C Huang, Pamela Metten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mouse lines are being selectively bred in replicate for high blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) achieved after a short period of ethanol (EtOH) drinking early in the circadian dark phase. High Drinking in the Dark-1 (HDID-1) mice were in selected generation S18, and the replicate HDID-2 line in generation S11.
METHODS: To determine other traits genetically correlated with high DID, we compared naïve animals from both lines with the unselected, segregating progenitor stock, HS/Npt. Differences between HDID-1 and HS would imply commonality of genetic influences on DID and these traits.
RESULTS: HDID-1 mice showed less basal activity, greater EtOH stimulated activity, and greater sensitivity to EtOH-induced foot slips than HS. They showed lesser sensitivity to acute EtOH hypothermia and longer duration loss of righting reflex than HS. HDID-1 and control HS lines did not differ in sensitivity on 2 measures of intoxication, the balance beam and the accelerating rotarod. None of the acute response results could be explained by differences in EtOH metabolism. HDID-2 differed from HS on some, but not all, of the above responses.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that some EtOH responses share common genetic control with reaching high BECs after DID, a finding consistent with other data regarding genetic contributions to EtOH responses.
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22316249      PMCID: PMC3349784          DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01735.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  29 in total

1.  The clinical course of alcohol dependence associated with a low level of response to alcohol.

Authors:  M A Schuckit; T L Smith
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Assessment of genetic susceptibility to ethanol intoxication in mice.

Authors:  Nathan R Rustay; Douglas Wahlsten; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The complexity of alcohol drinking: studies in rodent genetic models.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips; John K Belknap
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Ethanol tolerance and withdrawal severity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Alexandre M Colville; Lauren C Kruse; Andy J Cameron; Stephanie E Spence; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Pamela Metten
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Human and laboratory rodent low response to alcohol: is better consilience possible?

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Richard L Bell; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 6.  Tolerance to, and dependence on, some non-opiate psychotropic drugs.

Authors:  H Kalant; A E LeBlanc; R J Gibbins
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Reversed light-dark cycle and cage enrichment effects on ethanol-induced deficits in motor coordination assessed in inbred mouse strains with a compact battery of refined tests.

Authors:  Elizabeth Munn; Mark Bunning; Sofia Prada; Martin Bohlen; John C Crabbe; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Genotypic differences in ethanol sensitivity in two tests of motor incoordination.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Chia-Hua Yu; Jason P Schlumbohm; Andy J Cameron; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-04-18

9.  Genetic analysis of rapid tolerance to ethanol's incoordinating effects in mice: inbred strains and artificial selection.

Authors:  Nathan R Rustay; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Low-dose stimulatory effects of ethanol during adolescence in rat lines selectively bred for high alcohol intake.

Authors:  Z A Rodd; R L Bell; D L McKinzie; A A Webster; J M Murphy; L Lumeng; T-K Li; W J McBride
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Rodent models of genetic contributions to motivation to abuse alcohol.

Authors:  John C Crabbe
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2014

2.  Using In Vitro Electrophysiology to Screen Medications: Accumbal Plasticity as an Engram of Alcohol Dependence.

Authors:  R Renteria; Z M Jeanes; R A Mangieri; E Y Maier; D M Kircher; T R Buske; R A Morrisett
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.230

3.  Genetic relationship between predisposition for binge alcohol consumption and blunted sensitivity to adverse effects of alcohol in mice.

Authors:  Brandon M Fritz; Kristy A Cordero; Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Pamela Metten; John C Crabbe; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Effects of Pharmacologically Targeting Neuroimmune Pathways on Alcohol Drinking in Mice Selectively Bred to Drink to Intoxication.

Authors:  Angela R Ozburn; Pamela Metten; Sheena Potretzke; Kayla G Townsley; Yuri A Blednov; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Genetic studies of acute tolerance, rapid tolerance, and drinking in the dark in the LXS recombinant inbred strains.

Authors:  Richard A Radcliffe; Colin Larson; Beth Bennett
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  The effect of prior alcohol consumption on the ataxic response to alcohol in high-alcohol preferring mice.

Authors:  Brandon M Fritz; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Behavioral disinhibition in mice bred for high drinking in the dark (HDID) and HS controls increases following ethanol.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Travis M Moschak; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Progress in a replicated selection for elevated blood ethanol concentrations in HDID mice.

Authors:  J C Crabbe; P Metten; J K Belknap; S E Spence; A J Cameron; J P Schlumbohm; L C Huang; A M Barkley-Levenson; M M Ford; T J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 9.  High drinking in the dark mice: a genetic model of drinking to intoxication.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.405

10.  Rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol in High Drinking in the Dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Christopher L Cunningham; Phoebe J Smitasin; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.