Literature DB >> 21664382

Reversed light-dark cycle and cage enrichment effects on ethanol-induced deficits in motor coordination assessed in inbred mouse strains with a compact battery of refined tests.

Elizabeth Munn1, Mark Bunning, Sofia Prada, Martin Bohlen, John C Crabbe, Douglas Wahlsten.   

Abstract

The laboratory environment existing outside the test situation itself can have a substantial influence on results of some behavioral tests with mice, and the extent of these influences sometimes depends on genotype. For alcohol research, the principal issue is whether genotype-related ethanol effects will themselves be altered by common variations in the lab environment or instead will be essentially the same across a wide range of lab environments. Data from 20 inbred strains were used to reduce an original battery of seven tests of alcohol intoxication to a compact battery of four tests: the balance beam and grip strength with a 1.25 g/kg ethanol dose and the accelerating rotarod and open-field activation tests with 1.75 g/kg. The abbreviated battery was then used to study eight inbred strains housed under a normal or reversed light-dark cycle, or a standard or enriched home cage environment. The light-dark cycle had no discernable effects on any measure of behavior or response to alcohol. Cage enrichment markedly improved motor coordination in most strains. Ethanol-induced motor coordination deficits were robust; the well-documented strain-dependent effects of ethanol were not altered by cage enrichment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21664382      PMCID: PMC3159708          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  56 in total

Review 1.  Neural consequences of environmental enrichment.

Authors:  H van Praag; G Kempermann; F H Gage
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock.

Authors:  Satchidananda Panda; Marina P Antoch; Brooke H Miller; Andrew I Su; Andrew B Schook; Marty Straume; Peter G Schultz; Steve A Kay; Joseph S Takahashi; John B Hogenesch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Identification and ranking of genetic and laboratory environment factors influencing a behavioral trait, thermal nociception, via computational analysis of a large data archive.

Authors:  Elissa J Chesler; Sonya G Wilson; William R Lariviere; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Assessment of genetic susceptibility to ethanol intoxication in mice.

Authors:  Nathan R Rustay; Douglas Wahlsten; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Environmental enrichment and the brain.

Authors:  A H Mohammed; S W Zhu; S Darmopil; J Hjerling-Leffler; P Ernfors; B Winblad; M C Diamond; P S Eriksson; N Bogdanovic
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  Influences of laboratory environment on behavior.

Authors:  Elissa J Chesler; Sonya G Wilson; William R Lariviere; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Effects of environmental enrichment on spatial memory and neurochemistry in middle-aged mice.

Authors:  Karyn M Frick; Nancy A Stearns; Jing-Yu Pan; Joanne Berger-Sweeney
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 8.  In search of a better mouse test.

Authors:  Douglas Wahlsten; Nathan R Rustay; Pamela Metten; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Effects of environmental enrichment for mice: variation in experimental results.

Authors:  Heleen A Van de Weerd; Emma L Aarsen; Anne Mulder; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Coenraad F M Hendriksen; Vera Baumans
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.440

10.  Influence of task parameters on rotarod performance and sensitivity to ethanol in mice.

Authors:  Nathan R Rustay; Douglas Wahlsten; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Loss of environmental enrichment increases vulnerability to cocaine addiction.

Authors:  Joëlle Nader; Claudia Chauvet; Chauvet Claudia; Rana El Rawas; Laure Favot; Mohamed Jaber; Nathalie Thiriet; Marcello Solinas
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Ethanol sensitivity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Lauren C Kruse; Alexandre M Colville; Andy J Cameron; Stephanie E Spence; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Pamela Metten
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Hippocampal commissure defects in crosses of four inbred mouse strains with absent corpus callosum.

Authors:  M O Bohlen; J D Bailoo; R L Jordan; D Wahlsten
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.449

4.  Conditional Loss of Arx From the Developing Dorsal Telencephalon Results in Behavioral Phenotypes Resembling Mild Human ARX Mutations.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Simonet; C Nicole Sunnen; Jue Wu; Jeffrey A Golden; Eric D Marsh
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Experimenter effects on behavioral test scores of eight inbred mouse strains under the influence of ethanol.

Authors:  Martin Bohlen; Erika R Hayes; Benjamin Bohlen; Jeremy D Bailoo; John C Crabbe; Douglas Wahlsten
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Animal Models of Depression and Drug Delivery with Food as an Effective Dosing Method: Evidences from Studies with Celecoxib and Dicholine Succinate.

Authors:  João P Costa-Nunes; Brandon H Cline; Margarida Araújo-Correia; Andreia Valença; Natalyia Markova; Oleg Dolgov; Aslan Kubatiev; Naira Yeritsyan; Harry W M Steinbusch; Tatyana Strekalova
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comprehensive characterization of motor and coordination functions in three adolescent wild-type mouse strains.

Authors:  Ahmed Eltokhi; Barbara Kurpiers; Claudia Pitzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Reversible dysregulation of renal circadian rhythm in lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Rakesh Mishra; Ramalingam Bethunaickan; Celine C Berthier; Zhengzi Yi; Joshua J Strohl; Patricio T Huerta; Weijia Zhang; Anne Davidson
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 6.354

9.  Location- and sex-specific differences in weight and motor coordination in two commonly used mouse strains.

Authors:  Attila D Kovács; David A Pearce
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Directive 2010/63/EU on animal experimentation may skew the conclusions of pharmacological and behavioural studies.

Authors:  Simone Macrì; Chiara Ceci; Luisa Altabella; Rossella Canese; Giovanni Laviola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.