Literature DB >> 24219304

Progress in a replicated selection for elevated blood ethanol concentrations in HDID mice.

J C Crabbe1, P Metten, J K Belknap, S E Spence, A J Cameron, J P Schlumbohm, L C Huang, A M Barkley-Levenson, M M Ford, T J Phillips.   

Abstract

Drinking in the dark (DID) is a limited access ethanol-drinking phenotype in mice. High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) mice have been bred for 27 selected generations (S27) for elevated blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) after a 4-h period of access to 20% ethanol. A second replicate line (HDID-2) was started later from the same founder population and is currently in S20. An initial report of response to selection in HDID-1 was published after S11. This article reports genetic and behavioral characteristics of both lines in comparison with the HS controls. Heritability is low in both replicates (h(2)  = 0.09) but the lines have shown 4-5 fold increases in BEC since S0; 80% of HDID-1 and 60% of HDID-2 mice reach BECs greater than 1.0 mg/ml. Several hours after a DID test, HDID mice show mild signs of withdrawal. Although not considered during selection, intake of ethanol (g/kg) during the DID test increased by approximately 80% in HDID-1 and 60% in HDID-2. Common genetic influences were more important than environmental influences in determining the similarity between BEC and intake for HDID mice. Analysis of the partitioning of intake showed that 60% of intake is concentrated in the last 2 h of the 4 h session. However, this has not changed during selection. Hourly BECs during the DID test reach peak levels after 3 or 4 h of drinking. HDID mice do not differ from HS mice in their rate of elimination of an acute dose of alcohol.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binge; ethanol consumption; ethanol withdrawal; genetics; selective breeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219304      PMCID: PMC3923418          DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  36 in total

Review 1.  The complexity of alcohol drinking: studies in rodent genetic models.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Tamara J Phillips; John K Belknap
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  A systems genetic analysis of alcohol drinking by mice, rats and men: influence of brain GABAergic transmission.

Authors:  Laura M Saba; Beth Bennett; Paula L Hoffman; Kelsey Barcomb; Takao Ishii; Katerina Kechris; Boris Tabakoff
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Mouse strain differences in preference for various concentrations of alcohol.

Authors:  D A RODGERS; G E McCLEARN
Journal:  Q J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1962-03

4.  Alcohol withdrawal severity in inbred mouse (Mus musculus) strains.

Authors:  Pamela Metten; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Relationship of alcohol dose to intensity of withdrawal signs in mice.

Authors:  D B Goldstein
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Alcohol preference drinking in a mouse line selectively bred for high drinking in the dark.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Stephanie E Spence; Lauren L Brown; Pamela Metten
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  The relationship between adjunctive drinking, blood ethanol concentration and plasma corticosterone across fixed-time intervals of food delivery in two inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Matthew M Ford; Andrea M Steele; Aubrey D McCracken; Deborah A Finn; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.905

8.  Genetic selection for high and low alcohol consumption in a limited-access paradigm.

Authors:  A D Lê; Y Israel; W Juzytsch; B Quan; S Harding
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Mouse inbred strain differences in ethanol drinking to intoxication.

Authors:  J S Rhodes; M M Ford; C-H Yu; L L Brown; D A Finn; T Garland; J C Crabbe
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.449

10.  A line of mice selected for high blood ethanol concentrations shows drinking in the dark to intoxication.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Justin S Rhodes; Chia-Hua Yu; Lauren Lyon Brown; Tamara J Phillips; Deborah A Finn
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  28 in total

1.  Gender-Specific Effects of Selection for Drinking in the Dark on the Network Roles of Coding and Noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  Ovidiu Dan Iancu; Alex M Colville; Beth Wilmot; Robert Searles; Priscila Darakjian; Christina Zheng; Shannon McWeeney; Sunita Kawane; John C Crabbe; Pamela Metten; Denesa Oberbeck; Robert Hitzemann
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Voluntary induction and maintenance of alcohol dependence in rats using alcohol vapor self-administration.

Authors:  Giordano de Guglielmo; Marsida Kallupi; Maury D Cole; Olivier George
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Genetic relationship between predisposition for binge alcohol consumption and blunted sensitivity to adverse effects of alcohol in mice.

Authors:  Brandon M Fritz; Kristy A Cordero; Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Pamela Metten; John C Crabbe; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  High Drinking in the Dark (HDID) mice are sensitive to the effects of some clinically relevant drugs to reduce binge-like drinking.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Angela R Ozburn; Pamela Metten; Amanda Barkley-Levenson; Jason P Schlumbohm; Stephanie E Spence; Wyatt R Hack; Lawrence C Huang
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Effects of Pharmacologically Targeting Neuroimmune Pathways on Alcohol Drinking in Mice Selectively Bred to Drink to Intoxication.

Authors:  Angela R Ozburn; Pamela Metten; Sheena Potretzke; Kayla G Townsley; Yuri A Blednov; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Effects of chronic ethanol exposure on neuronal function in the prefrontal cortex and extended amygdala.

Authors:  Kristen E Pleil; Emily G Lowery-Gionta; Nicole A Crowley; Chia Li; Catherine A Marcinkiewcz; Jamie H Rose; Nora M McCall; Antoniette M Maldonado-Devincci; A Leslie Morrow; Sara R Jones; Thomas L Kash
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Animal models of excessive alcohol consumption: recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  Howard C Becker; Dorit Ron
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.405

8.  Fear conditioning in mouse lines genetically selected for binge-like ethanol drinking.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Jason P Schlumbohm; Wyatt Hack; Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Pamela Metten; K Matthew Lattal
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 9.  High drinking in the dark mice: a genetic model of drinking to intoxication.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.405

10.  Targeting the Glucocorticoid Receptor Reduces Binge-Like Drinking in High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) Mice.

Authors:  Antonia M Savarese; Angela R Ozburn; Pamela Metten; Jason P Schlumbohm; Wyatt R Hack; Kathryn LeMoine; Hazel Hunt; Felix Hausch; Michael Bauder; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.