BACKGROUND: There are no existing data on alcoholic beverage prices and ethanol (EtOH) content at the level of alcohol brand. A comprehensive understanding of alcohol prices and EtOH content at the brand level is essential for the development of effective public policy to reduce alcohol use among underage youth. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess alcoholic beverage prices and EtOH content at the brand level. METHODS: Using online alcohol price data from 15 control states and 164 online alcohol stores, we estimated the average alcohol price and percent alcohol by volume for 900 brands of alcohol, across 17 different alcoholic beverage types, in the United States in 2011. RESULTS: There is considerable variation in both brand-specific alcohol prices and EtOH content within most alcoholic beverage types. For many types of alcohol, the within-category variation between brands exceeds the variation in average price and EtOH content among the several alcoholic beverage types. Despite differences in average prices between alcoholic beverage types, in 12 of the 16 alcoholic beverage types, customers can purchase at least 1 brand of alcohol that is under $1 per ounce of EtOH. CONCLUSIONS: Relying on data or assumptions about alcohol prices and EtOH content at the level of alcoholic beverage type is insufficient for understanding and influencing youth drinking behavior. Surveillance of alcohol prices and EtOH content at the brand level should become a standard part of alcohol research.
BACKGROUND: There are no existing data on alcoholic beverage prices and ethanol (EtOH) content at the level of alcohol brand. A comprehensive understanding of alcohol prices and EtOH content at the brand level is essential for the development of effective public policy to reduce alcohol use among underage youth. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess alcoholic beverage prices and EtOH content at the brand level. METHODS: Using online alcohol price data from 15 control states and 164 online alcohol stores, we estimated the average alcohol price and percent alcohol by volume for 900 brands of alcohol, across 17 different alcoholic beverage types, in the United States in 2011. RESULTS: There is considerable variation in both brand-specific alcohol prices and EtOH content within most alcoholic beverage types. For many types of alcohol, the within-category variation between brands exceeds the variation in average price and EtOH content among the several alcoholic beverage types. Despite differences in average prices between alcoholic beverage types, in 12 of the 16 alcoholic beverage types, customers can purchase at least 1 brand of alcohol that is under $1 per ounce of EtOH. CONCLUSIONS: Relying on data or assumptions about alcohol prices and EtOH content at the level of alcoholic beverage type is insufficient for understanding and influencing youth drinking behavior. Surveillance of alcohol prices and EtOH content at the brand level should become a standard part of alcohol research.
Authors: M Grønbaek; E L Mortensen; K Mygind; A T Andersen; U Becker; C Gluud; T I Sørensen Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Majken K Jensen; Anne T Andersen; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Ulrik Becker; Thorkil Thorsen; Morten Grønbaek Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Craig S Ross; Emily Maple; Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Joshua Ostroff; Alisa A Padon; Dina L G Borzekowski; David H Jernigan Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Michael Siegel; Craig S Ross; Alison B Albers; William DeJong; Charles King; Timothy S Naimi; David H Jernigan Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Timothy S Naimi; Craig S Ross; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; David H Jernigan Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Matthew E Rossheim; Dennis L Thombs; Alexander C Wagenaar; Ziming Xuan; Subhash Aryal Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alison B Albers; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Michael Siegel; David H Jernigan Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Sarah P Roberts; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; David H Jernigan Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Michael Siegel; Jody Grundman; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Charles King; Alison B Albers; Rebecca S Williams; David H Jernigan Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Michael Siegel; Kelsey Chen; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Joshua Ostroff; Craig S Ross; David H Jernigan Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Alison Burke Albers; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Michael Siegel; Jessica Ruhlman Shoaff; David H Jernigan Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.043