Literature DB >> 12022723

Alcohol advertising and youth.

Henry Saffer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The question addressed in this review is whether aggregate alcohol advertising increases alcohol consumption among college students. Both the level of alcohol-related problems on college campuses and the level of alcohol advertising are high. Some researchers have concluded that the cultural myths and symbols used in alcohol advertisements have powerful meanings for college students and affect intentions to drink. There is, however, very little empirical evidence that alcohol advertising has any effect on actual alcohol consumption.
METHOD: The methods used in this review include a theoretical framework for evaluating the effects of advertising. This theory suggests that the marginal effect of advertising diminishes at high levels of advertising. Many prior empirical studies measured the effect of advertising at high levels of advertising and found no effect. Those studies that measure advertising at lower, more disaggregated levels have found an effect on consumption.
RESULTS: The results of this review suggest that advertising does increase consumption. However, advertising cannot be reduced with limited bans, which are likely to result in substitution to other available media. Comprehensive bans on all forms of advertising and promotion can eliminate options for substitution and be potentially more effective in reducing consumption. In addition, there is an increasing body of literature that suggests that alcohol counteradvertising is effective in reducing the alcohol consumption of teenagers and young adults.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that increased counteradvertising, rather than new advertising bans, appears to be the better choice for public policy. It is doubtful that the comprehensive advertising bans required to reduce advertising would ever receive much public support. New limited bans on alcohol advertising might also result in less alcohol counteradvertising. An important topic for future research is to identify the counteradvertising themes that are most effective with youth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022723     DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Suppl        ISSN: 0363-468X


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of the average price and ethanol content of alcoholic beverages by brand--United States, 2011.

Authors:  Joanna T DiLoreto; Michael Siegel; Danielle Hinchey; Heather Valerio; Kathryn Kinzel; Stephanie Lee; Kelsey Chen; Jessica R Shoaff; Jessica Kenney; David H Jernigan; William DeJong
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Selection of branded alcoholic beverages by underage drinkers.

Authors:  Craig S Ross; Joshua Ostroff; Timothy S Naimi; William DeJong; Michael B Siegel; David H Jernigan
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  The relationship between brand-specific alcohol advertising on television and brand-specific consumption among underage youth.

Authors:  Craig S Ross; Emily Maple; Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Joshua Ostroff; Alisa A Padon; Dina L G Borzekowski; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  The relationship between population-level exposure to alcohol advertising on television and brand-specific consumption among underage youth in the US.

Authors:  Craig S Ross; Emily Maple; Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Alisa A Padon; Dina L G Borzekowski; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.826

Review 5.  Exploring Alcohol Policy Approaches to Prevent Sexual Violence Perpetration.

Authors:  Caroline Lippy; Sarah DeGue
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2014-11-16

6.  The relationships between alcohol source, autonomy in brand selection, and brand preference among youth in the USA.

Authors:  Sarah P Roberts; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.826

7.  Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Alcohol brand sponsorship of events, organizations and causes in the United States, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Olivia Belt; Korene Stamatakos; Amanda J Ayers; Victoria A Fryer; David H Jernigan; Michael Siegel
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  "Drinking won't get you thinking": a content analysis of adolescent-created print alcohol counter-advertisements.

Authors:  Smita C Banerjee; Kathryn Greene; Michael L Hecht; Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Elvira Elek
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2013-08-27

9.  Brands matter: Major findings from the Alcohol Brand Research Among Underage Drinkers (ABRAND) project.

Authors:  Sarah P Roberts; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; Craig S Ross; Timothy Naimi; Alison Albers; Margie Skeer; David L Rosenbloom; David H Jernigan
Journal:  Addict Res Theory       Date:  2015-06-04

Review 10.  The effect of alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on drinking behaviour in young people: systematic review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Lesley A Smith; David R Foxcroft
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.