BACKGROUND: The alcohol brand preferences of US underage drinkers have recently been identified, but it is not known whether youth are simply mimicking adult brand choices or whether other factors are impacting their preferences. This study is the first to compare the alcohol brand preferences of underage drinkers and adults. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional assessment of youth and adult alcohol brand preferences. A 2012 Internet-based survey of a nationally representative sample of 1032 underage drinkers, ages 13-20, was used to determine the prevalence of past-30-day consumption for each of 898 alcohol brands, and each brand's youth market share, based on the total number of standard drinks consumed. Data on the brand-specific prevalence of past-30-day or past-7-day consumption among older youth (ages 18-20), adults (ages 21+), and young adults (ages 21-34) was obtained from Gfk MRI's Survey of the Adult Consumer for the years 2010-2012. Overall market shares for each brand, also measured by the total number of standard drinks consumed, were estimated from national data compiled by Impact Databank for the year 2010. RESULTS: Although most alcohol brands popular among underage drinkers were also popular among adult drinkers, there were several brands that appeared to be disproportionately consumed by youth. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides preliminary evidence that youth do not merely mimic the alcohol brand choices of adults. Further research using data derived from fully comparable data sources is necessary to confirm this finding.
BACKGROUND: The alcohol brand preferences of US underage drinkers have recently been identified, but it is not known whether youth are simply mimicking adult brand choices or whether other factors are impacting their preferences. This study is the first to compare the alcohol brand preferences of underage drinkers and adults. METHODS: The authors conducted a cross-sectional assessment of youth and adult alcohol brand preferences. A 2012 Internet-based survey of a nationally representative sample of 1032 underage drinkers, ages 13-20, was used to determine the prevalence of past-30-day consumption for each of 898 alcohol brands, and each brand's youth market share, based on the total number of standard drinks consumed. Data on the brand-specific prevalence of past-30-day or past-7-day consumption among older youth (ages 18-20), adults (ages 21+), and young adults (ages 21-34) was obtained from Gfk MRI's Survey of the Adult Consumer for the years 2010-2012. Overall market shares for each brand, also measured by the total number of standard drinks consumed, were estimated from national data compiled by Impact Databank for the year 2010. RESULTS: Although most alcohol brands popular among underage drinkers were also popular among adult drinkers, there were several brands that appeared to be disproportionately consumed by youth. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides preliminary evidence that youth do not merely mimic the alcohol brand choices of adults. Further research using data derived from fully comparable data sources is necessary to confirm this finding.
Authors: Ellen E Bouchery; Henrick J Harwood; Jeffrey J Sacks; Carol J Simon; Robert D Brewer Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Connie Lim; Howell Wechsler Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2012-06-08
Authors: Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; Erin K Fortunato; Alison B Albers; Timothy Heeren; David L Rosenbloom; Craig Ross; Joshua Ostroff; Sergei Rodkin; Charles King; Dina L G Borzekowski; Rajiv N Rimal; Alisa A Padon; Raimee H Eck; David H Jernigan Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Michael Siegel; Craig S Ross; Alison B Albers; William DeJong; Charles King; Timothy S Naimi; David H Jernigan Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Sarah P Roberts; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; David H Jernigan Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Matthis Morgenstern; Franziska Schoeppe; Julie Campbell; Marloes W G Braam; Michael Stoolmiller; James D Sargent Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sarah P Roberts; Michael B Siegel; William DeJong; Craig S Ross; Timothy Naimi; Alison Albers; Margie Skeer; David L Rosenbloom; David H Jernigan Journal: Addict Res Theory Date: 2015-06-04
Authors: Alisa A Padon; Rajiv N Rimal; Michael Siegel; William DeJong; Timothy S Naimi; David H JernFigan Journal: J Public Health Res Date: 2018-04-20