Literature DB >> 22315505

Measuring quality improvement in public health: the development and psychometric testing of a QI Maturity Tool.

Brenda M Joly1, Maureen Booth, Prashant Mittal, George Shaler.   

Abstract

There is growing interest and investment in improving the quality of public health services and outcomes. Following the lead of other sectors, efforts are underway to introduce systematic quality improvement (QI) tools and approaches to state and local public health agencies. Little is known, however, about how to describe and reliably measure the level of QI maturity within a public health agency. The authors describe the development of a QI Maturity Tool using research from the fields of organizational design, psychology, health care, and complexity theory. The 37-item assessment tool is based on four quality domains derived from the literature: (a) organizational culture, (b) capacity and competency, (c) practice, and (d) alignment and spread. The tool was designed to identify features of an organization that may be enhancing or impeding QI; monitor the impact of efforts to create a more favorable environment for QI; and define potential cohorts of public health agencies for evaluation purposes. The article presents initial steps in testing and validating the QI Maturity Tool including: (a) developing a theoretical framework, (b) assuring face and content validity, (c) determining the tool's reliability based on estimates of internal consistency, (d) assessing the dimensionality, and (f) determining the construct validity of the instrument. The authors conclude that there is preliminary evidence that the QI Maturity Tool is a promising instrument. Further work is underway to explore whether self-reported survey results align with an agency's actions and the products of their QI efforts.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22315505     DOI: 10.1177/0163278711433065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Quality Improvement and Public Health Accreditation Readiness in Nebraska Local Health Departments, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Li-Wu Chen; Abbey Gregg; David Palm
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Local health department factors associated with performance in the successful implementation of community-based strategies: a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gyllstrom; Kimberly Gearin; Renee Frauendienst; Julie Myhre; Michelle Larson; William Riley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Relationship between quality improvement implementation and accreditation seeking in local health departments.

Authors:  Li-Wu Chen; Anh Nguyen; Janelle J Jacobson; Niodita Gupta; Sarbinaz Bekmuratova; David Palm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: a framework for public health.

Authors:  Anita W McLees; Saira Nawaz; Craig Thomas; Andrea Young
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Development and Scoring of a Survey on Public Health Accreditation Capacity.

Authors:  Melanie D Whittington; Adam J Atherly; Li Wu Chen; Lisa VanRaemdonck; Sarah Lampe
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Seeing the quality improvement forest through the quality improvement trees: A meta-synthesis of case studies in Florida and Georgia.

Authors:  William C Livingood; Lori Bilello; Katryne Lukens-Bull
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-04-22

7.  Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review.

Authors:  S'thembile Thusini; Maria Milenova; Noushig Nahabedian; Barbara Grey; Tayana Soukup; Claire Henderson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  Comparison of practice based research network based quality improvement technical assistance and evaluation to other ongoing quality improvement efforts for changes in agency culture.

Authors:  William C Livingood; Angela H Peden; Gulzar H Shah; Nandi A Marshall; Ketty M Gonzalez; Russell B Toal; Dayna S Alexander; Alesha R Wright; Lynn D Woodhouse
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Amédé Gogovor; Mamane Abdoulaye Samri; José Massougbodji; Luke Wolfenden; Jenny Ploeg; Merrick Zwarenstein; Andrew J Milat; Nathalie Rheault; Youssoufa M Ousseine; Jennifer Salerno; Maureen Markle-Reid; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-03-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.