PURPOSE: The SRS-24 questionnaire was originally validated using methods of classical test theory, but internal construct validity has never been shown. Internal construct validity, i.e. unidimensionality and linearity, is a fundamental arithmetic requirement and needs to be shown for a scale for summating any set of Likert-type items. Here, internal construct validity of the SRS-24 questionnaire in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients is analyzed. METHODS: 232 SRS-24 questionnaires distributed to 116 patients with AIS pre-operatively and at postoperative follow-up were analyzed. 103 patients were females; the average age was 16.5 ± 7.1 years. The questionnaires were subjected to Rasch analysis using the RUMM2020 software package. RESULTS: All seven domains of the SRS-24 showed misfit to the Rasch model, and three of seven were unidimensional. Unidimensionality and linearity could only be achieved for an aggregate score by separating pre- and postoperative items and omitting items which caused model misfit. Reducing the questionnaire to six pre-operative items (p = 0.098; 2.25% t tests) and five postoperative items (p = 0.267; 3.70% t tests) yields model fit and unidimensionality for both summated scores. The person-separation indices (PSI) were 0.67 and 0.69, respectively, for the pre- and postoperative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SRS-24 score is a non-linear and multidimensional construct. Adding the items into a single value is therefore not supported and invalid in principle. Making profound changes to the questionnaire yields a score which fulfills the properties of internal construct validity and supports its use a change score for outcome measurement.
PURPOSE: The SRS-24 questionnaire was originally validated using methods of classical test theory, but internal construct validity has never been shown. Internal construct validity, i.e. unidimensionality and linearity, is a fundamental arithmetic requirement and needs to be shown for a scale for summating any set of Likert-type items. Here, internal construct validity of the SRS-24 questionnaire in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients is analyzed. METHODS: 232 SRS-24 questionnaires distributed to 116 patients with AIS pre-operatively and at postoperative follow-up were analyzed. 103 patients were females; the average age was 16.5 ± 7.1 years. The questionnaires were subjected to Rasch analysis using the RUMM2020 software package. RESULTS: All seven domains of the SRS-24 showed misfit to the Rasch model, and three of seven were unidimensional. Unidimensionality and linearity could only be achieved for an aggregate score by separating pre- and postoperative items and omitting items which caused model misfit. Reducing the questionnaire to six pre-operative items (p = 0.098; 2.25% t tests) and five postoperative items (p = 0.267; 3.70% t tests) yields model fit and unidimensionality for both summated scores. The person-separation indices (PSI) were 0.67 and 0.69, respectively, for the pre- and postoperative patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SRS-24 score is a non-linear and multidimensional construct. Adding the items into a single value is therefore not supported and invalid in principle. Making profound changes to the questionnaire yields a score which fulfills the properties of internal construct validity and supports its use a change score for outcome measurement.
Authors: T R Haher; J M Gorup; T M Shin; P Homel; A A Merola; D P Grogan; L Pugh; T G Lowe; M Murray Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Andrew A Merola; Thomas R Haher; Mario Brkaric; Georgia Panagopoulos; Samir Mathur; Omid Kohani; Thomas G Lowe; Larry G Lenke; Dennis R Wenger; Peter O Newton; David H Clements; Randal R Betz Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Julie F Pallant; Anne-Maree Keenan; Roseanne Misajon; Philip G Conaghan; Alan Tennant Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: A F Mannion; A Elfering; T F Fekete; I J Harding; M Monticone; P Obid; T Niemeyer; U Liljenqvist; A Boss; L Zimmermann; A Vila-Casademunt; F J Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; J Pizones; F Pellisé; S Richner-Wunderlin; F S Kleinstück; I Obeid; L Boissiere; A Alanay; J Bagó Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: A F Mannion; A Elfering; J Bago; F Pellise; A Vila-Casademunt; S Richner-Wunderlin; M Domingo-Sàbat; I Obeid; E Acaroglu; A Alanay; F S Pérez-Grueso; C R Baldus; L Y Carreon; K H Bridwell; S D Glassman; F Kleinstück Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2017-09-02 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Christine B Sieberg; Laura E Simons; Mark R Edelstein; Maria R DeAngelis; Melissa Pielech; Navil Sethna; M Timothy Hresko Journal: J Pain Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Hasan Ghandehari; Maryam Ameri Mahabadi; Seyed Mani Mahdavi; Ali Shahsavaripour; Hossein Vahid Seyed Tari; Farshad Safdari Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2015-04