Literature DB >> 21289573

Internal construct validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire: Rasch analysis of a disease-specific outcome measure for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Christine M Comer1, Philip G Conaghan, Alan Tennant.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Rasch analysis of an outcome tool using data from questionnaires completed by patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common cause of low back pain and leg symptoms in older patients. The SSS questionnaire was devised as a condition-specific outcome measure for patients with LSS. It comprises two subscales; one to measure symptom severity and another to measure physical functioning. The SSS is commonly used in trials for patients with LSS but has not, to our knowledge, been subjected to rigorous modern psychometric analysis methods.
METHODS: Data from a total of 190 SSS assessments in 98 people with LSS were fitted to the Rasch measurement model. This method was used to examine the validity of the item scoring functions, the presence of item bias or differential item functioning and the fit of data to model expectations. In addition, the analysis was used to assess whether or not the item set in each scale formed a unidimensional scale to provide a valid summed score.
RESULTS: The symptom severity scale and the physical function scale of the SSS were found to be reliable and well targeted to the study population. However, the symptom severity scale was found to be multidimensional; three items focused on pain and four items on neuroischemic symptoms. The physical function scale performed well as a unidimensional scale, but needed to be modified by excluding one item in order for it to fit the Rasch model.
CONCLUSION: Development of a more robust measurement tool for this patient group may be warranted. A new tool may need to include three scales to measure the separate domains of pain severity, neuroischemic symptom severity, and physical function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289573     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc9daf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Analysis of internal construct validity of the SRS-24 questionnaire.

Authors:  Dominique A Rothenfluh; Georg Neubauer; Juergen Klasen; Kan Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Do we have the right PROMs for measuring outcomes in lumbar spinal surgery?

Authors:  O M Stokes; A A Cole; L M Breakwell; A J Lloyd; C M Leonard; M Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of the spinal stenosis measure.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Johann Steurer; Lukas M Wildi; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Study protocol- Lumbar Epidural steroid injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS): a double-blind randomized controlled trial of epidural steroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis among older adults.

Authors:  Janna L Friedly; Brian W Bresnahan; Bryan Comstock; Judith A Turner; Richard A Deyo; Sean D Sullivan; Patrick Heagerty; Zoya Bauer; Srdjan S Nedeljkovic; Andrew L Avins; David Nerenz; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Objective Measurement Scales and Ambulatory Status.

Authors:  Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar; Owoicho Adogwa; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

6.  Translation and Validation of the Danish Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jamal Bech Bouknaitir; Leah Y Carreon; Stig Brorson; Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-21

7.  Reliability and Validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for Iranian Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Afshin Ahmadzadeh Heshmati; Moghaddameh Mirzaee
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-03

Review 8.  Fundamentals of Clinical Outcomes Assessment for Spinal Disorders: Clinical Outcome Instruments and Applications.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Anne Kathleen B Ganal-Antonio; Julia Quidde; Francis H Shen; Jens R Chapman; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-03-13

9.  Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal Trouble (BOOST) trial: statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial of a combined physical and psychological intervention for older adults with neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  Ioana R Marian; Esther Williamson; Angela Garrett; Sarah E Lamb; Susan J Dutton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.