Literature DB >> 12634567

A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument.

Andrew A Merola1, Thomas R Haher, Mario Brkaric, Georgia Panagopoulos, Samir Mathur, Omid Kohani, Thomas G Lowe, Larry G Lenke, Dennis R Wenger, Peter O Newton, David H Clements, Randal R Betz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS 24).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patient based outcome of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A paucity of information exists with respect to patient measures of outcome regarding the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. To our knowledge, no prospective outcome study on this topic thus far exists.
METHODS: Using the SRS 24 questionnaire, seven scoliosis centers agreed to prospectively assess outcome for surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Data were collected before surgery and at 24 months after surgery. Data were analyzed using paired and independent samples t test for all seven SRS 24 questionnaire domains (Pain, General Self-Image, Postoperative Self-Image, Postoperative Function, Function From Back Condition, General Level of Activity, and Satisfaction) using Statistical Package for Social Science. The domains were analyzed with respect to the total cohort, gender, curve magnitude, and type of surgery using independent-samples t tests.
RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included in our analysis. A baseline preoperative pain level of 3.68 of 5 was found. This improved to 4.63 after surgery, representing an improvement of 0.95 points. Surgical intervention was associated with improving outcome when compared with preoperative status. Pain, General Self-Image, Function From Back Condition, and Level of Activity all demonstrated statistically significant improvement as compared with preoperative status (P < 0. 001). Overall, patients were highly satisfied with the results of surgery.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative pain exists in our adolescent scoliosis population. Pain scores were improved in our study population at the 2-year postsurgical follow-up. Statistically significant improvements were likewise seen in the General Self-Image, Function From Back Condition, and Level of Activity domains. The present study demonstrates the ability of surgery to improve the outcome of patients afflicted with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12634567     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200209150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  30 in total

1.  Analysis of internal construct validity of the SRS-24 questionnaire.

Authors:  Dominique A Rothenfluh; Georg Neubauer; Juergen Klasen; Kan Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years.

Authors:  Dietrich Schlenzka; Ville Remes; Ilkka Helenius; Tommi Lamberg; Pekka Tervahartiala; Timo Yrjönen; Kaj Tallroth; Kalevi Osterman; Seppo Seitsalo; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24.

Authors:  Karen Petra Weigert; Linda Marie Nygaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  CORR Insights®: When Should We Wean Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Harish Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predicting the pain continuum after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  V Chidambaran; L Ding; D L Moore; K Spruance; E M Cudilo; V Pilipenko; M Hossain; P Sturm; S Kashikar-Zuck; L J Martin; S Sadhasivam
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 7.  Infections in spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Antoine Gerometta; Juan Carlos Rodriguez Olaverri; Fabian Bitan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Males with familial idiopathic scoliosis: a distinct phenotypic subgroup.

Authors:  Mark Clough; Cristina M Justice; Beth Marosy; Nancy H Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Scoliosis: a review.

Authors:  Caroline J Goldberg; David P Moore; Esmond E Fogarty; Frank E Dowling
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with arthrodesis and posterior titanium instrumentation: 8 to 12 years follow up without late infection.

Authors:  Franz J Mueller; Herbert Gluch
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.