Birgitt van Oorschot1, Michael Schuler, Alfred Simon, Michael Flentje. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Interdisciplinary Center of Palliative Care, University of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany. Oorschot_B@klinik.uni-wuerzburg.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: Advance directives (AD) are becoming increasingly widespread. We examine the prevalence of AD and the factors associated with AD in tumor patients during radiotherapy. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was handed out to all tumor patients on 9 random days with an interval of at least 12 weeks. The data were analyzed in a bivariate and multivariate way. RESULTS: Of 1,208 questionnaires, 658 were completed and returned (54.5%). Of respondents, 23.6% had already signed an AD, 53.3% thought they were likely to sign an AD, 9.0% did not want to sign an AD, and 4.9% were not familiar with advance directives. Patients who have signed an AD and those who are likely to sign one think that ADs facilitate the physician's decision-making process (97.7% cf. 94.5%) and that they ease the burden on relatives (98.5% cf. 98.8%). Regardless of an AD having been signed, every second respondent was of the opinion that AD facilitates consultations rather than serving as a directive (55.1% cf. 57.3%). Patients likely to sign an AD are significantly younger compared to those unlikely to do so and have suffered from their tumor disease for a shorter period of time. CONCLUSIONS: Of advance directives is widely accepted among the tumor patients surveyed. Advanced directives are not exclusively seen as instruments for surrogate decision making, but also as mediums to improve communication. Training of physicians and additional offers for patients could increase the actual number of ADs and perhaps improve physicians and relatives understanding of patients needs and wishes.
PURPOSE: Advance directives (AD) are becoming increasingly widespread. We examine the prevalence of AD and the factors associated with AD in tumorpatients during radiotherapy. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was handed out to all tumorpatients on 9 random days with an interval of at least 12 weeks. The data were analyzed in a bivariate and multivariate way. RESULTS: Of 1,208 questionnaires, 658 were completed and returned (54.5%). Of respondents, 23.6% had already signed an AD, 53.3% thought they were likely to sign an AD, 9.0% did not want to sign an AD, and 4.9% were not familiar with advance directives. Patients who have signed an AD and those who are likely to sign one think that ADs facilitate the physician's decision-making process (97.7% cf. 94.5%) and that they ease the burden on relatives (98.5% cf. 98.8%). Regardless of an AD having been signed, every second respondent was of the opinion that AD facilitates consultations rather than serving as a directive (55.1% cf. 57.3%). Patients likely to sign an AD are significantly younger compared to those unlikely to do so and have suffered from their tumor disease for a shorter period of time. CONCLUSIONS: Of advance directives is widely accepted among the tumorpatients surveyed. Advanced directives are not exclusively seen as instruments for surrogate decision making, but also as mediums to improve communication. Training of physicians and additional offers for patients could increase the actual number of ADs and perhaps improve physicians and relatives understanding of patients needs and wishes.
Authors: J Teno; J Lynn; N Wenger; R S Phillips; D P Murphy; A F Connors; N Desbiens; W Fulkerson; P Bellamy; W A Knaus Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lindsay A Dow; Robin K Matsuyama; V Ramakrishnan; Laura Kuhn; Elizabeth B Lamont; Laurel Lyckholm; Thomas J Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Katharina A Kierner; Birgit Hladschik-Kermer; Verena Gartner; Herbert H Watzke Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-05-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alaina J Brown; Megan J Shen; Lois M Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka; Robert L Giuntoli; Teresa Diaz-Montes Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Julie C McDonald; Jeanne M du Manoir; Nanor Kevork; Lisa W Le; Camilla Zimmermann Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Iraida V Carrion; Frances R Nedjat-Haiem; Dinorah Martinez-Tyson; Heide Castañeda Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Christoph L Lassen; Susanne Aberle; Nicole Lindenberg; Annika Bundscherer; Tobias W Klier; Bernhard M Graf; Christoph H Wiese Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2015-11-13 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Carmen W H Chan; Martin M H Wong; Kai Chow Choi; Helen Y L Chan; Amy Y M Chow; Raymond S K Lo; Michael M K Sham Journal: Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Date: 2019 Jan-Mar