AIM: The purpose of advance directives (AD) is to preserve the patient's autonomy at the end of his/her life. In a cohort study, we investigated attitudes towards AD in hospitalized patients with malignant disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were informed about the basic features of AD in a standardized manner by a single independent physician. One hundred and eight (39 women, 69 men; mean age 56.6 +/- 14.9 years) of 140 invited patients completed the study. MAIN RESULTS: Five percent of patients (5/108) already had an AD; 85% (92/108) did not wish to issue an AD. "Full confidence in physicians" (22%) and "not important for me at the moment" (15%) were the most frequently stated reasons for not issuing an AD. Only 10% (11/108) of patients decided to complete an AD. Their decision was not related to a specific diagnosis or a number of socio-demographic variables that were studied. Patients who decided in favor of an AD had significantly higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) score than those who decided against it (HADS-D, 8.3 +/- 5.0 vs.5.8 +/- 4.1, p = 0.035). The patients' HADS depression score was negatively associated with their Karnofsky index (r = -0.232, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal a scarce demand for AD in our population of hospitalized cancer patients. Patients who wanted to issue an AD had a high HADS-D, which is associated with a low performance status.
AIM: The purpose of advance directives (AD) is to preserve the patient's autonomy at the end of his/her life. In a cohort study, we investigated attitudes towards AD in hospitalized patients with malignant disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients were informed about the basic features of AD in a standardized manner by a single independent physician. One hundred and eight (39 women, 69 men; mean age 56.6 +/- 14.9 years) of 140 invited patients completed the study. MAIN RESULTS: Five percent of patients (5/108) already had an AD; 85% (92/108) did not wish to issue an AD. "Full confidence in physicians" (22%) and "not important for me at the moment" (15%) were the most frequently stated reasons for not issuing an AD. Only 10% (11/108) of patients decided to complete an AD. Their decision was not related to a specific diagnosis or a number of socio-demographic variables that were studied. Patients who decided in favor of an AD had significantly higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) score than those who decided against it (HADS-D, 8.3 +/- 5.0 vs.5.8 +/- 4.1, p = 0.035). The patients' HADS depression score was negatively associated with their Karnofsky index (r = -0.232, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Our data reveal a scarce demand for AD in our population of hospitalized cancerpatients. Patients who wanted to issue an AD had a high HADS-D, which is associated with a low performance status.
Authors: Ladislav Volicer; Michael D Cantor; Arthur R Derse; Denise Murray Edwards; Angela M Prudhomme; Dorothy C Rasinski Gregory; James E Reagan; James A Tulsky; Ellen Fox Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: J Teno; J Lynn; N Wenger; R S Phillips; D P Murphy; A F Connors; N Desbiens; W Fulkerson; P Bellamy; W A Knaus Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joseph B Straton; Nae-Yuh Wang; Lucy A Meoni; Daniel E Ford; Michael J Klag; David Casarett; Joseph J Gallo Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Katharina A Kierner; Verena Gartner; Rupert Bartsch; Birgit Hladschik-Kermer; Anna Gruber; Marco Hassler; Herbert H Watzke Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Julie C McDonald; Jeanne M du Manoir; Nanor Kevork; Lisa W Le; Camilla Zimmermann Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: J A F Koekkoek; L Dirven; J C Reijneveld; E M Sizoo; H R W Pasman; T J Postma; L Deliens; R Grant; S McNamara; W Grisold; E Medicus; G Stockhammer; S Oberndorfer; B Flechl; C Marosi; M J B Taphoorn; J J Heimans Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-07-20 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jochen Pfirstinger; Bernhard Bleyer; Christian Blum; Michael Rechenmacher; Christoph H Wiese; Hans Gruber Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: JinShil Kim; Mi-Seung Shin; Albert Youngwoo Jang; Shinmi Kim; Seongkum Heo; EunSeok Cha; Minjeong An Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alice Coffey; Geraldine McCarthy; Elizabeth Weathers; M Isabel Friedman; Katherine Gallo; Mally Ehrenfeld; Sophia Chan; William H C Li; Piera Poletti; Renzo Zanotti; D William Molloy; Ciara McGlade; Joyce J Fitzpatrick; Michal Itzhaki Journal: Int J Nurs Pract Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 2.066