Literature DB >> 22310957

Burden of pelvis fracture: a population-based study of incidence, hospitalisation and mortality.

D Prieto-Alhambra1, F F Avilés, A Judge, T Van Staa, X Nogués, N K Arden, A Díez-Pérez, C Cooper, M K Javaid.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to describe the incidence and consequences of pelvic fractures in a community cohort. The incidence of pelvic fractures increases with age with a protective effect of higher body mass index. Almost 60% of those with a pelvic fracture required an inpatient stay, with a median of 9 days. There was a higher 3-year mortality in those admitted (17%) vs. those not admitted (6.3%). Given the substantial health burden, further work is required to identify the optimal post-fracture therapeutic strategy to improve outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: The burden of pelvis fractures is projected to increase, but there is a paucity of community-based studies describing rates, mortality and future fracture risk. We therefore estimated the age, gender and BMI-specific incidence of pelvis fracture in Catalonia (North-East Spain), and assessed hospital stay and mortality following fracture.
METHODS: The SIDIAP(Q) database contains validated clinical information from computerised medical records of a representative sample of 30% of the population of Catalonia. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all subjects aged ≥ 40 in SIDIAP(Q) and linked to the regional Hospital Admissions Database from 2007 to 2009. Pelvis fractures were ascertained using ICD-10 codes. Incidence and mortality rates were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 1,118,173 patients (582,820 women) were observed for 3 years and 1,356 had a pelvic fracture. The rate for pelvic fracture was 4.35/10,000 person-years (pyar) [95% CI 4.13-4.59] (men-2.73 [2.48-3.01]; women-5.82 [5.46-6.20]). This increased with age, peaking in those over 90 years: 29.41 [25.74-33.59]. Higher BMI was protective (HR 0.75 per SD BMI; [0.69-0.82]). Moreover, 59.1% of fractured patients were hospitalised with a median (IQR) stay of 9 (5-16) days, and after the 3-year follow-up 13.9% died (mortality rate 10.7/100 pyar [9.3-12.3]) with higher rates in those hospitalised (17.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic fractures are associated with high rates of hospitalisation and mortality. Given this, further work is required to identify the optimal post-fracture therapeutic strategy to improve outcomes in this elderly patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22310957     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-1907-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

1.  Health services utilization after fractures: evidence from Medicare.

Authors:  David J Becker; Huifeng Yun; Meredith L Kilgore; Jeffrey R Curtis; Elizabeth Delzell; Lisa C Gary; Kenneth G Saag; Michael A Morrisey
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Construction and validation of a scoring system for the selection of high-quality data in a Spanish population primary care database (SIDIAP).

Authors:  M Del Mar García-Gil; Eduardo Hermosilla; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Francesc Fina; Magdalena Rosell; Rafel Ramos; Jordi Rodriguez; Tim Williams; Tjeerd Van Staa; Bonaventura Bolíbar
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2011

3.  Mortality and causes of death among patients with isolated limb and pelvic fractures.

Authors:  D E Deakin; C Boulton; C G Moran
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Mortality rate of pelvic fracture patients.

Authors:  R C Wubben
Journal:  Wis Med J       Date:  1996-10

5.  Epidemiology of pelvic fractures in a Swedish county.

Authors:  B Ragnarsson; B Jacobsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-06

6.  Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry, and fracture incidence in the women's health initiative-observational study.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck; Moira A Petit; Guanglin Wu; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Mortality after pelvic fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  I Rossvoll; V Finsen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  The German Multicentre Pelvis Registry: a template for an European Expert Network?

Authors:  Tim Pohlemann; Georgios Tosounidis; Martin Bircher; Peter Giannoudis; Ulf Culemann
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Obesity and fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Melissa Orlandin Premaor; Lesley Pilbrow; Carol Tonkin; Richard A Parker; Juliet Compston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  L J Melton; J M Sampson; B F Morrey; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  21 in total

1.  Risk factors of mortality during the first year after low energy osteoporosis fracture: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Aurore Lloret; Guillaume Coiffier; Tiffen Couchouron; Aleth Perdriger; Pascal Guggenbuhl
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

2.  Fracture admission trends in England over a ten-year period.

Authors:  T Jennison; M Brinsden
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Epidemiology of major osteoporotic fractures: a population-based analysis in Catalonia, Spain.

Authors:  Xavier Surís; Emili Vela; Montserrat Clèries; Maria-Jesús Pueyo-Sánchez; Esteve Llargués; Marta Larrosa
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Relative mortality in U.S. Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson disease and hip and pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Allison W Willis; Sandra E Klein; Sylvia Czuppon; Beth Crowner; Brad A Racette
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  How long should we treat?

Authors:  C Roux; K Briot
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The descriptive epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis in Catalonia: a retrospective study using routinely collected data.

Authors:  F Fina-Aviles; M Medina-Peralta; L Mendez-Boo; E Hermosilla; J M Elorza; M Garcia-Gil; R Ramos; B Bolibar; M K Javaid; C J Edwards; C Cooper; N K Arden; D Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Lithuanian Version of the Majeed Pelvic Score.

Authors:  Giedrius Petryla; Rokas Bobina; Sigitas Ryliškis; Valentinas Uvarovas; Jaunius Kurtinaitis; Tomas Sveikata; Giedrius Kvederas; Igoris Šatkauskas
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Internal fixation of radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis: a case series.

Authors:  Mehdi Boudissa; Geoffrey Porcheron; Daniel Wagner; Frank Traub; George Farah; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Diabetes and risk of fracture-related hospitalization: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Andrea L C Schneider; Emma K Williams; Frederick L Brancati; Saul Blecker; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Survivorship and severe complications are worse for octogenarians and elderly patients with pelvis fractures as compared to adults: data from the national trauma data bank.

Authors:  Amir Matityahu; Joshua Elson; Saam Morshed; Meir Marmor
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2012-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.