Literature DB >> 17397843

The German Multicentre Pelvis Registry: a template for an European Expert Network?

Tim Pohlemann1, Georgios Tosounidis, Martin Bircher, Peter Giannoudis, Ulf Culemann.   

Abstract

The range of severity of pelvic injuries is wide and can include simple, undisplaced pelvic fractures, which may limit the activity of the individual patient for only a short period of time, and severe, complex or even open pelvic fractures, causing immediate life threatening situations. Even with continuous progress in development of techniques and treatment protocols, primary treatment and definitive reconstruction of pelvic ring injuries and acetabular fractures there is still an ongoing debate about specific problems in the evaluation of injuries and fractures. Because of the low incidence of pelvic fractures (37/100,000) the individual experience, which can be acquired by the surgical team, even in major Trauma Centres, is limited and can only be acquired over a longer period of time. The German Multicentre Pelvic Study Group started with reporting of pelvic fractures in 1991 and included 10 University- and Major Trauma Hospitals. The intense work on definitions and classification during the first years generated a universal "language" of understanding, which also helped in unifying indications and even procedures in pelvic and acetabular fractures. With several modifications and expansion of the number of participating hospitals the Group has been active until now and is just entering a "third phase" converting into the "German Multicentre Pelvic and Acetabular Registry" being technologically modified to an Internet based data registry. As this registry is already designed as an open platform, not limited in capacity and regions, it provides a platform, which may easily be expanded to the European level allowing for international multicentre studies and case sampling. Therefore this type of pelvic registry could act as a basis for further scientific evaluation of specific topics in the field of pelvic and acetabular surgery and could be a template for a European Expert Network. Driven by the differences of healthcare systems and organisation of trauma care within Europe and the challenge that pelvic fractures not only can lead to permanent disability, but also play an important role in posttraumatic fatalities, a clear need can be shown for detailed analysis of the present situation within the different European nations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397843     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  11 in total

1.  Burden of pelvis fracture: a population-based study of incidence, hospitalisation and mortality.

Authors:  D Prieto-Alhambra; F F Avilés; A Judge; T Van Staa; X Nogués; N K Arden; A Díez-Pérez; C Cooper; M K Javaid
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Treatment and outcomes of pelvic malunions and nonunions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Antonios G Angoules; Vassilios S Nikolaou; George Kontakis; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Hemicorporectomy as a life-saving strategy for severe pelvic ring crush injury: a case report.

Authors:  Salin Pereira Warr; Paula M Jaramillo; Sebastian Tobon Franco; Carlos Oliver Valderrama-Molina; Alfredo Constain Franco
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-10

4.  What is the frequency of nerve injuries associated with acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Michael Hoffmann; Florian Fensky; Jakob Nüchtern; Lars Großterlinden; Emin Aghayev; Helmar Lehmann; Fabian Stuby; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular trauma in a Dublin tertiary hospital: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  N Davarinos; P Ellanti; S Morris; J P Mc Elwain
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis - a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel G G Wilson; Joshua Kelly; Mark Rickman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  What are predictors for patients' quality of life after pelvic ring fractures?

Authors:  Joerg H Holstein; Antonius Pizanis; Daniel Köhler; Tim Pohlemann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing].

Authors:  A Schäffler; F Fensky; D Knöschke; N P Haas; A G Becken; U Stöckle; B König
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  Evaluation of decision-making in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Christof Audretsch; Alexander Trulson; Andreas Höch; Steven C Herath; Tina Histing; Markus A Küper
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

10.  Pelvic Fractures in Children Results from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jörn Zwingmann; Emin Aghayev; Norbert P Südkamp; Mirjam Neumann; Gerrit Bode; Fabian Stuby; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.