Literature DB >> 22310755

Understanding the role of percutaneous biopsy in the management of patients with a small renal mass.

Hung-Jui Tan1, Bruce L Jacobs, Khaled S Hafez, Jeffrey S Montgomery, Alon Z Weizer, David P Wood, David C Miller, J Stuart Wolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient and tumor characteristics associated with percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB) among patients with small renal masses (SRMs) and assessed the impact on clinical decision-making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 204 consecutive patients presenting with a clinical stage T1 renal mass at our institution, we collected data regarding patient demographics, comorbidity, renal function, anatomic factors, and treatment plan. We then assessed the association between these characteristics and receipt of RMB, and between biopsy results and initial treatment decision.
RESULTS: Among 204 patients, 78 (38%) received RMB. Of the demographic and physiological parameters, only non-Caucasian race and family history of renal cell carcinoma were associated with biopsy (P<.05). In contrast, RMB was significantly associated with several anatomic factors, including larger tumor size, solitary kidney, juxta-hilar tumor location, greater body mass index (BMI), and high-complexity nephrometry score (P<.05). On multivariable analysis, only BMI>25 kg/m2, juxta-hilar location, and high-complexity nephrometry score remained significantly associated with RMB (P<.05). Biopsy was performed in a greater proportion of patients who ultimately underwent radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) (P=.04). Furthermore, RMB results directly impacted treatment, with active surveillance more frequent among patients with benign or favorable histology and surgical management more common among patients with more aggressive disease (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: At our institution, one-third of patients presenting with a SRM undergo RMB, most commonly among patients with complicated anatomic and/or tumor considerations. Because these factors may limit the feasibility of NSS, biopsies are being used to guide decision-making aimed at minimizing total kidney loss.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22310755     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses.

Authors:  Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Percutaneous biopsy for risk stratification of renal masses.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; Anna Drewry; Edwin Jason Abel
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-10

Review 3.  [Active surveillance: concept for renal cell carcinoma?].

Authors:  I Tsaur; D Schilling; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The contemporary role of renal mass biopsy in the management of small renal tumors.

Authors:  Amy Lim; Brock O'Neil; Marta E Heilbrun; Christopher Dechet; William T Lowrance
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer.

Authors:  Daniel M Geynisman; Jodi K Maranchie; Mark W Ball; Gennady Bratslavsky; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.954

6.  Tumor Seeding With Renal Cell Carcinoma After Renal Biopsy.

Authors:  M F B Andersen; T P Norus
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2016-09-25

7.  Utilization of Renal Mass Biopsy for T1 Renal Lesions across Michigan: Results from MUSIC-KIDNEY, A Statewide Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Authors:  Amit K Patel; Brian R Lane; Prateek Chintalapati; Lina Fouad; Mohit Butaney; Jeffrey Budzyn; Anna Johnson; Ji Qi; Edward Schervish; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.