BACKGROUND: A founding principle of hospice is that the patient and family is the unit of care; however, we lack national information on services to family members. Although Medicare certification requires bereavement services be provided, reimbursement rates are not tied to the level or quality of care; therefore, limited financial incentives exist for hospice to provide more than a minimal benefit. OBJECTIVES: To assess the scope and intensity of services provided to family members by hospice. RESEARCH DESIGN: We fielded a national survey of hospices between September 2008 and November 2009. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of US hospices with an 84% response rate (N=591). MEASURES: Bereavement services to the family, bereavement services to the community, labor-intensive family services, and comprehensive family services. RESULTS: Most hospices provided bereavement services to the family (78%) and to the community (76%), but only a minority of hospices provided labor-intensive (23%) or comprehensive (27%) services to grieving family members. Larger hospice size was positively and significantly associated with each of the 4 measures of family services. We found no significant difference in provision of bereavement services to the family, labor-intensive services, or comprehensive services by ownership type; however, nonprofit hospices were more likely than for-profit hospices to provide bereavement services to the community. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show substantial diversity in the scope and intensity of services provided to families of patients with terminal illnesses, suggesting a need for clearer guidance on what hospices should provide to exemplify best practices. Consensus within the field on more precise guidelines in this area is essential.
BACKGROUND: A founding principle of hospice is that the patient and family is the unit of care; however, we lack national information on services to family members. Although Medicare certification requires bereavement services be provided, reimbursement rates are not tied to the level or quality of care; therefore, limited financial incentives exist for hospice to provide more than a minimal benefit. OBJECTIVES: To assess the scope and intensity of services provided to family members by hospice. RESEARCH DESIGN: We fielded a national survey of hospices between September 2008 and November 2009. PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of US hospices with an 84% response rate (N=591). MEASURES: Bereavement services to the family, bereavement services to the community, labor-intensive family services, and comprehensive family services. RESULTS: Most hospices provided bereavement services to the family (78%) and to the community (76%), but only a minority of hospices provided labor-intensive (23%) or comprehensive (27%) services to grieving family members. Larger hospice size was positively and significantly associated with each of the 4 measures of family services. We found no significant difference in provision of bereavement services to the family, labor-intensive services, or comprehensive services by ownership type; however, nonprofit hospices were more likely than for-profit hospices to provide bereavement services to the community. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show substantial diversity in the scope and intensity of services provided to families of patients with terminal illnesses, suggesting a need for clearer guidance on what hospices should provide to exemplify best practices. Consensus within the field on more precise guidelines in this area is essential.
Authors: H G Prigerson; A J Bierhals; S V Kasl; C F Reynolds; M K Shear; N Day; L C Beery; J T Newsom; S Jacobs Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Melissa D A Carlson; Jeph Herrin; Qingling Du; Andrew J Epstein; Emily Cherlin; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge; Mark Schlesinger; Colleen L Barry; R Sean Morrison; Ruth McCorkle; Rosemary Hürzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Katherine A Ornstein; Melissa D Aldridge; Melissa M Garrido; Rebecca Gorges; Diane E Meier; Amy S Kelley Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge; Andrew J Epstein; Abraham A Brody; Eric J Lee; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Aleksandra S Dain; Elizabeth H Bradley; Rosemary Hurzeler; Melissa D Aldridge Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Debra Parker Oliver; Sara Shaunfield; L Ashley Gage; Megan Mooney; Alexandria Lewis Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2014-02-24
Authors: Melissa D Aldridge Carlson; Colleen L Barry; Emily J Cherlin; Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jessica Y Allen; William E Haley; Brent J Small; Ron S Schonwetter; Susan C McMillan Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Angela R Ghesquiere; Melissa D Aldridge; Rosemary Johnson-Hürzeler; Daniel Kaplan; Martha L Bruce; Elizabeth Bradley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 5.562