Literature DB >> 17610443

Hospice care: what services do patients and their families receive?

Melissa D A Carlson1, R Sean Morrison, Theodore R Holford, Elizabeth H Bradley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which patients and families enrolled with hospice received services across key categories of palliative care, the extent of hospice-level variability in services delivered, and changes over time in services delivered. DATA SOURCE: Nationally representative sample of 9,409 discharged patients from 2,066 hospices in the National Home and Hospice Care Survey. STUDY
DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study conducted from 1992 to 2000. The primary outcome is the receipt of services across five key categories of palliative care: nursing care, physician care, medication management, psychosocial care, and caregiver support. DATA COLLECTION: Data were obtained via interview with the hospice staff member most familiar with the patient's care, in conjunction with medical record review. PRINCIPLE
FINDINGS: In 2000, 22 percent of patients enrolled with hospice received services across five key categories of palliative care. There was marked variation across hospices in service delivery. One-third of hospices provided patients and families services in one or two of the five key categories of palliative care, whereas 14 percent of hospices provided services across five key categories of palliative care. In multivariable analysis, the odds of receiving any additional hospice service was significantly greater in later compared with earlier years (odds ratio=1.10, 95 percent confidence interval 1.01-1.20). Nevertheless, the percentages of patients in 2000 receiving medication management (59 percent), respite care (7 percent), and physician services (30 percent) remained low.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospice care for patients and families varies substantially across hospices. Whereas some hospices provide services across the key categories of palliative care, other hospices do not provide this breadth of services. Greater understanding of the causes of variation in service delivery as well as its impact on patient and family outcomes and satisfaction with end-of-life care is a critical subject for future research. Changes in Medicare's reimbursement policies may help hospices increase the range of services provided to patients and families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17610443      PMCID: PMC1955268          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00685.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  27 in total

1.  Geography and the debate over Medicare reform.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Deaths: final data for 2000.

Authors:  Arialdi M Miniño; Elizabeth Arias; Kenneth D Kochanek; Sherry L Murphy; Betty L Smith
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2002-09-16

3.  The Stressful Caregiving Adult Reactions to Experiences of Dying (SCARED) Scale: a measure for assessing caregiver exposure to distress in terminal care.

Authors:  Holly G Prigerson; Emily Cherlin; Joyce H Chen; Stanislav V Kasl; Rosemary Hurzeler; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.105

4.  The growth of palliative care programs in United States hospitals.

Authors:  R Sean Morrison; Catherine Maroney-Galin; Peter D Kralovec; Diane E Meier
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 5.  The promise of a good death.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Racial variations in end-of-life care.

Authors:  F P Hopp; S A Duffy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Depression among surviving caregivers: does length of hospice enrollment matter?

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Holly Prigerson; Melissa D A Carlson; Emily Cherlin; R Johnson-Hurzeler; Stanislav V Kasl
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Use of hospitals, physician visits, and hospice care during last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Elliott S Fisher; Thérèse A Stukel; Jonathan S Skinner; Sandra M Sharp; Kristen K Bronner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-13

10.  Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment.

Authors:  R S Pritchard; E S Fisher; J M Teno; S M Sharp; D J Reding; W A Knaus; J E Wennberg; J Lynn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  17 in total

1.  The debate in hospice care.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Geographic access to hospice in the United States.

Authors:  Melissa D A Carlson; Elizabeth H Bradley; Qingling Du; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Caring for grieving family members: results from a national hospice survey.

Authors:  Colleen L Barry; Melissa D A Carlson; Jennifer W Thompson; Mark Schlesinger; Ruth McCorkle; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Study design, precision, and validity in observational studies.

Authors:  Melissa D A Carlson; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Improving access to hospice care: informing the debate.

Authors:  Melissa D A Carlson; R Sean Morrison; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Drug interactions in dying patients: a retrospective analysis of hospice inpatients in Germany.

Authors:  Sebastian Frechen; Anna Zoeller; Klaus Ruberg; Raymond Voltz; Jan Gaertner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Quality of palliative care at US hospices: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Melissa D A Carlson; Colleen Barry; Mark Schlesinger; Ruth McCorkle; R Sean Morrison; Emily Cherlin; Jeph Herrin; Jennifer Thompson; Martha L Twaddle; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Factors that influence the presence of a hospice in a rural community.

Authors:  Cathy L Campbell; Elizabeth Merwin; Guofen Yan
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.176

9.  Does caregiver knowledge matter for hospice enrollment and beyond? Pilot study of minority hospice patients.

Authors:  Kyusuk Chung; Elizabeth Lehr Essex; Linda Samson
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  On the notion of home and the goals of palliative care.

Authors:  Wim Dekkers
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.