BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers are an integral part of end-of-life care for hospice patients with cancer. Although adjustment following loss is highly individual, many caregivers have significant psychological distress after the death of a loved one. This study investigated risk factors that may predict psychological distress, which could aid hospice bereavement departments in targeting bereavement services. METHOD: Demographic characteristics, patient impairment, caregiver baseline symptoms of depression, and caregiver resources were assessed among 188 cancer patient-caregiver dyads. Regression analyses identified predictors of symptoms of depression, grief, and complicated grief one year following loss. RESULTS: Over 50% of bereaved caregivers had clinically significant depressive symptoms one year after death of their relative. Caregivers with fewer years of education and more baseline symptoms of depression had significantly worse grief, complicated grief, and depression. Younger patient age was a significant predictor of poorer outcomes for grief and complicated grief; and less patient impairment was a significant predictor of more post-loss symptoms of depression. Lower social support satisfaction was correlated with worse grief and complicated grief but was not a significant multivariate predictor of poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite having access to hospice bereavement services, many former caregivers had high psychological distress one year following loss. Bereavement departments could consider utilizing readily available risk factors to target services to former caregivers who may benefit from bereavement services. Bereavement departments might also consider including brief, standardized screenings of caregiver depression in initial risk assessments. Future studies should investigate evidence-based approaches for assessment and interventions among highly distressed former hospice caregivers.
BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers are an integral part of end-of-life care for hospice patients with cancer. Although adjustment following loss is highly individual, many caregivers have significant psychological distress after the death of a loved one. This study investigated risk factors that may predict psychological distress, which could aid hospice bereavement departments in targeting bereavement services. METHOD: Demographic characteristics, patient impairment, caregiver baseline symptoms of depression, and caregiver resources were assessed among 188 cancerpatient-caregiver dyads. Regression analyses identified predictors of symptoms of depression, grief, and complicated grief one year following loss. RESULTS: Over 50% of bereaved caregivers had clinically significant depressive symptoms one year after death of their relative. Caregivers with fewer years of education and more baseline symptoms of depression had significantly worse grief, complicated grief, and depression. Younger patient age was a significant predictor of poorer outcomes for grief and complicated grief; and less patient impairment was a significant predictor of more post-loss symptoms of depression. Lower social support satisfaction was correlated with worse grief and complicated grief but was not a significant multivariate predictor of poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite having access to hospice bereavement services, many former caregivers had high psychological distress one year following loss. Bereavement departments could consider utilizing readily available risk factors to target services to former caregivers who may benefit from bereavement services. Bereavement departments might also consider including brief, standardized screenings of caregiver depression in initial risk assessments. Future studies should investigate evidence-based approaches for assessment and interventions among highly distressed former hospice caregivers.
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Holly Prigerson; Melissa D A Carlson; Emily Cherlin; R Johnson-Hurzeler; Stanislav V Kasl Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Emily J Cherlin; Colleen L Barry; Holly G Prigerson; Dena Schulman Green; Rosemary Johnson-Hurzeler; Stanislav V Kasl; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: R K Portenoy; H T Thaler; A B Kornblith; J M Lepore; H Friedlander-Klar; E Kiyasu; K Sobel; N Coyle; N Kemeny; L Norton Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Richard Schulz; Aaron B Mendelsohn; William E Haley; Diane Mahoney; Rebecca S Allen; Song Zhang; Larry Thompson; Steven H Belle Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maija Reblin; Brian R W Baucom; Margaret F Clayton; Rebecca Utz; Michael Caserta; Dale Lund; Kathi Mooney; Lee Ellington Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Jesse M Bell; Tina M Mason; Harleah G Buck; Cindy S Tofthagen; Allyson R Duffy; Maureen W Groër; James P McHale; Kevin E Kip Journal: Clin Nurs Res Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 2.075
Authors: Sarah T Stahl; Stephen F Smagula; Mary Amanda Dew; Richard Schulz; Steven M Albert; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-08 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Angela R Ghesquiere; Melissa D Aldridge; Rosemary Johnson-Hürzeler; Daniel Kaplan; Martha L Bruce; Elizabeth Bradley Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kailey Roberts; Jimmie Holland; Holly G Prigerson; Corinne Sweeney; Geoffrey Corner; William Breitbart; Wendy G Lichtenthal Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2016-08-12
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Andres Azuero; Kathleen D Lyons; Jay G Hull; Anna T Prescott; Tor Tosteson; Jennifer Frost; Konstantin H Dragnev; Marie A Bakitas Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.612