Literature DB >> 22310216

A biomedical engineering approach to mitigate the errors of prostate biopsy.

Hashim Uddin Ahmed1, Mark Emberton, Gordon Kepner, Jeremy Kepner.   

Abstract

The current protocol for detecting and ruling out prostate cancer involves serum PSA testing followed by sampling of the prostate using a transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy. Many specialists have discussed how PSA screening has contributed to underdetection of clinically significant prostate cancer, overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant disease and poor risk stratification; however, little consideration has been given to the role of TRUS-guided biopsy in these errors. The performance of TRUS-guided biopsy is constrained by the biomechanical attributes of the sampling strategy, resulting in suboptimal detection efficiency of each core. By using a biomedical engineering approach, a uniform grid sampling strategy could be used to improve the detection efficiency of prostate biopsy. Moreover, the calibration of the sampling can be adjusted by altering the distance between needle deployments. Our model shows that for any given number of needle trajectories, a uniform grid approach will be superior to a divergent, nonuniform strategy for the detection of clinically important disease. This is an important message that should result in a move away from divergent sampling to a uniform grid approach for prostate biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22310216     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  32 in total

Review 1.  Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Kirkham; Manit Arya; Rowland Illing; Alex Freeman; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; David G Bostwick; Otis W Brawley; Leonard G Gomella; Michael Marberger; Francesco Montorsi; Curtis A Pettaway; Teuvo L Tammela; Claudio Teloken; Donald J Tindall; Matthew C Somerville; Timothy H Wilson; Ivy L Fowler; Roger S Rittmaster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The role of 3-dimensional mapping biopsy in decision making for treatment of apparent early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Al B Barqawi; Kyle O Rove; Saeed Gholizadeh; Colin I O'Donnell; Hari Koul; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Jonathan I Epstein; Rodolfo Montironi; Peter R Carroll; Manfred Wirth; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Anders S Bjartell; Francesco Montorsi; Stephen J Freedland; Andreas Erbersdobler; Theodorus H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Evaluation of a novel precision template-guided biopsy system for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ifeanyichukwu I Megwalu; Genoa G Ferguson; John T Wei; Vladimir Mouraviev; Thomas J Polascik; Samir Taneja; Linda Black; Gerald L Andriole; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Peripheral zone prostate cancers: location and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology.

Authors:  Jérémie Haffner; Eric Potiron; Sébastien Bouyé; Philippe Puech; Xavier Leroy; Laurent Lemaitre; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Appropriate patient selection in the focal treatment of prostate cancer: the role of transperineal 3-dimensional pathologic mapping of the prostate--a 4-year experience.

Authors:  Winston E Barzell; Myron R Melamed
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Yipeng Hu; Tim Carter; Nimalan Arumainayagam; Emilie Lecornet; Alex Freeman; David Hawkes; Dean C Barratt; Mark Emberton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wennuan Liu; Sari Laitinen; Sofia Khan; Mauno Vihinen; Jeanne Kowalski; Guoqiang Yu; Li Chen; Charles M Ewing; Mario A Eisenberger; Michael A Carducci; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Jun Luo; Yue Wang; Jianfeng Xu; William B Isaacs; Tapio Visakorpi; G Steven Bova
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.

Authors:  A V Taira; G S Merrick; R W Galbreath; H Andreini; W Taubenslag; R Curtis; W M Butler; E Adamovich; K E Wallner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.554

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Targeted prostate biopsy and MR-guided therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Krzysztof R Gorny; Bernadette Greenwood; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Detecting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Christian von Bodman; Jüri Palisaar; Wolfgang Becker; Philipp Martin-Seidel; Joachim Noldus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Can we deliver randomized trials of focal therapy in prostate cancer?

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Viktor Berge; David Bottomley; William Cross; Rakesh Heer; Richard Kaplan; Tom Leslie; Chris Parker; Clare Relton; Richard Stephens; Matthew R Sydes; Lindsay Turnbull; Jan van der Meulen; Andrew Vickers; Timothy Wilt; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Ablation.

Authors:  David A Woodrum; Akira Kawashima; Krzysztof R Gorny; Lance A Mynderse
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Prostate cancer tumour features on template prostate-mapping biopsies: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Paras B Singh; Chukwuemeka Anele; Emma Dalton; Omar Barbouti; Daniel Stevens; Pratik Gurung; Manit Arya; Charles Jameson; Alex Freeman; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Zone-specific logistic regression models improve classification of prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dikaios; Jokha Alkalbani; Mohamed Abd-Alazeez; Harbir Singh Sidhu; Alex Kirkham; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Alex Freeman; Steve Halligan; Stuart Taylor; David Atkinson; Shonit Punwani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prostate cancer risk inflation as a consequence of image-targeted biopsy of the prostate: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Yipeng Hu; Hashim U Ahmed; Alex Freeman; Dean Barratt; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Logistic regression model for diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer on multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  Nikolaos Dikaios; Jokha Alkalbani; Harbir Singh Sidhu; Taiki Fujiwara; Mohamed Abd-Alazeez; Alex Kirkham; Clare Allen; Hashim Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Alex Freeman; Steve Halligan; Stuart Taylor; David Atkinson; Shonit Punwani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Andrew J Patterson; Brendan C Koo; Karan Wadhwa; Anne Y Warren; Andrew Doble; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Christof Kastner; Ferdia A Gallagher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.