Literature DB >> 21571335

The role of 3-dimensional mapping biopsy in decision making for treatment of apparent early stage prostate cancer.

Al B Barqawi1, Kyle O Rove, Saeed Gholizadeh, Colin I O'Donnell, Hari Koul, E David Crawford.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the impact of a grid based, transperineal 3-dimensional mapping biopsy on decision making for primary management of early stage prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed 3-dimensional mapping biopsy on 180 consecutive men who presented to our clinic between 2006 and 2009 with early stage, organ confined prostate cancer based on transrectal ultrasound guided 10 to 12-core biopsy, and on 35 with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies.
RESULTS: At presentation median patient age was 60.5 years (range 43 to 77), median prostate specific antigen was 4.8 ng/ml (range 0.5 to 72.4) and median prostate volume was 35 cc (range 9 to 95). The median number of cores acquired by transrectal ultrasound and 3-dimensional mapping biopsy was 12 and 56, and the median number of positive cores was 1 and 2, respectively. We documented Gleason score upgrade in 49 of 180 cases (27.2%) and up-stage in 82 (45.6%). The incidence of urinary retention catheter requirement of greater than 48 hours was 3.2% and the incidence of transient orthostatic hypotension was 5%. No urinary tract infections were documented. A total of 38 men received radical extirpative therapy, 11 radiation and 45 cryotherapy while 60 enrolled in a targeted focal therapy study, 44 entered active surveillance and 5 underwent other focal investigational treatments. Post-mapping data on 12 men were not available for analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional mapping biopsy revealed that a significant portion of men initially diagnosed with apparently low risk disease harbored clinically significant cancers requiring more aggressive therapy. The technique also enabled a number of men with low risk disease to elect surveillance or another less morbid option.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21571335     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

Review 1.  Focal therapy of prostate cancer: evidence-based analysis for modern selection criteria.

Authors:  Michael R Abern; Matvey Tsivian; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Transperineal biopsy of the prostate--is this the future?

Authors:  Dwayne T S Chang; Benjamin Challacombe; Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Temporal changes in the clinical approach to diagnosing prostate cancer.

Authors:  William M Hilton; Susan S Padalecki; Donna P Ankerst; Robin J Leach; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

4.  Clinical-pathologic correlation between transperineal mapping biopsies of the prostate and three-dimensional reconstruction of prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Kyle O Rove; Al B Barqawi; Paul D Maroni; Priya N Werahera; Craig A Baer; Hari K Koul; Cory A Rove; M Scott Lucia; Francisco G La Rosa
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

6.  Optimal prostate biopsy regimen.

Authors:  Ryan K Berglund; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Geometric evaluation of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Misop Han; Doyoung Chang; Chunwoo Kim; Brian J Lee; Yihe Zuo; Hyung-Joo Kim; Doru Petrisor; Bruce Trock; Alan W Partin; Ronald Rodriguez; H Ballentine Carter; Mohamad Allaf; Jongwon Kim; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  A biomedical engineering approach to mitigate the errors of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Gordon Kepner; Jeremy Kepner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Initial Experience of Targeted Focal Interstitial Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer with MRI Guidance.

Authors:  Al Barqawi; Kevin Krughoff; Hongli Li; Nayana U Patel
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2015-11-10

10.  Current Challenges in Prostate Cancer Management and the Rationale behind Targeted Focal Therapy.

Authors:  Al B Barqawi; Kevin J Krughoff; Khadijah Eid
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.