Literature DB >> 22306436

Container size influences snack food intake independently of portion size.

David Marchiori1, Olivier Corneille, Olivier Klein.   

Abstract

While larger containers have been found to increase food intake, it is unclear whether this effect is driven by container size, portion size, or their combination, as these variables are usually confounded. The study was advertised as examining the effects of snack food consumption on information processing and participants were served M&M's for free consumption in individual cubicles while watching a TV show. Participants were served (1) a medium portion of M&M's in a small (n=30) or (2) in a large container (n=29), or (3) a large portion in a large container (n=29). The larger container increased intake by 129% (199 kcal) despite holding portion size constant, while controlling for different confounding variables. This research suggests that larger containers stimulate food intake over and above their impact on portion size.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22306436     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  13 in total

Review 1.  The Influence of Portion Size and Timing of Meals on Weight Balance and Obesity.

Authors:  Christina Berg; Heléne Bertéus Forslund
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Portion size and obesity.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; L Kirsty Pourshahidi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

4.  Thinking about the bigger picture: Influence of holistic processing on the dishware size effect.

Authors:  Aaron Y Sim; Bobby K Cheon
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.345

5.  Variations in cereal volume affect the amount selected and eaten for breakfast.

Authors:  Barbara J Rolls; Jennifer S Meengs; Liane S Roe
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 6.  The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anneliese Arno; Steve Thomas
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

Review 8.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

9.  Estimating food portions. Influence of unit number, meal type and energy density.

Authors:  Eva Almiron-Roig; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jessica Dodd; Susan A Jebb
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  How does plate size affect estimated satiation and intake for individuals in normal-weight and overweight groups?

Authors:  M Peng
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2017-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.